Many dividend ETFs focus on high distribution yields, but the Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF ($FGEQ (-2,72 %) ) takes a different approach: quality comes first.

Instead of simply picking the highest dividend payers, this ETF specifically selects companies with solid profitability, stable balance sheets and sustainable dividend growth.

What makes this ETF special?

🔹 Quality strategy: Companies are filtered according to fundamental key figures, e.g. high return on equity and low debt ratio.

🔹 Global diversification: The ETF invests globally in industrialized countries, creating a good balance between regions.

🔹 Quarterly distribution: Ideal for investors who prefer regular cash flows.

🔹 Long-term focus: Instead of focusing on short-term dividend yields, the ETF pays attention to companies with sustainable distribution policies.

Difference to classic dividend ETFs

Many dividend ETFs simply pick the companies with the highest dividend yields and often these are companies with uncertain growth or unstable payouts.

The Fidelity ETF avoids this risk by including only solid companies with sustainable dividends.

Who is this ETF for?

✅ Long-term investorswho value stability and solid companies.

✅ Dividend investorswho prefer regular distributions with substance.

✅ Quality-conscious investorswho focus on strong business models in addition to dividends.

💡 Conclusion: This ETF is perfect for investors who don't just want to collect dividends, but want to invest in financially sound and well-managed companies.

Quality beats quantity! 🚀

Dear Community,

I am 25 years old and have been in the world of investing since 2022. I restructured my portfolio 1.5 years ago and opted for the $VWCE (-3,47 %) with a 70% savings rate, the $GGRP (-4,63 %) and the $FGEQ (-2,72 %) each with a 15% savings rate. My goal is to save for retirement. At the moment I'm still studying and therefore can't invest large sums yet, but I still want to have a fixed strategy and keep feeding it as soon as I earn money and let it run until I retire. Lately I've been doing some more thinking and research and I'm generally satisfied. I know the ETFs have overlaps, but they complement each other to some extent, e.g. through a higher weighting of consumer staples stocks, which are weighted lower in the $VWCE (-3,47 %) This is also reflected in a slightly better performance in the current market phase.

As I like dividend distributions but still don't want to lose out on share price performance, these ETFs have proven to be the right choice. As I would like to build up a monthly cash flow in addition to solid share price growth, especially for the future, which will pay for my Netflix subscription now and perhaps even my rent in the future, I am considering adding the $TDIV (-2,46 %) to include in my portfolio. This would allow me to significantly reduce the US share again and diversify the sectors a little more. In addition, with the 3 distributing ETFs I would have a monthly payout, which I personally like - especially psychologically.

What do you think of this portfolio with the 4 ETFs $VWCE (-3,47 %)
$GGRP (-4,63 %)
$FGEQ (-2,72 %)
$TDIV (-2,46 %) with a 70-10-10-10 weighting for a holding period of 30+ years?

I look forward to your advice.

Many thanks and best regards from Mexico City.

I would like to share this nice daily performance with everyone who sometimes doubts their investment in not so good times. I should note that I am not invested in crypto and that my two ETFS $QYLE (-6,16 %) and $FGEQ (-2,72 %) were stopped out, which has caused my portfolio value to shrink by 30k, but also frees up cash for possible additional purchases. Even if it's not so nice to look at my portfolio on some days, it's always worth it in the long term and in the short term the sun sometimes peeks through the cloudy investor sky. This is clear to the experienced investors here, but many of those who have not been invested for so long have had doubts, as I have read in a number of posts. As you can see, things can turn around quickly, even if only a few stocks are involved. Today $MUX (-1,31 %) stands out, also $HSBA (-6,34 %) has increased. That's not to say anything about my temporary problem children like $NOVO B (-2,25 %) or $HAUTO (-3,49 %) should not obscure the fact. To all doubters, no matter how you have set up your investment, please stay true to your goals, look at the market and don't get rattled. Act wisely and not with shaky fingers. In the long term, we will all be back on the winning side.

Unfortunately, this year's best alarm clock came a little late.

Due to my move to Zurich, I have not yet been able to invest anything this year. This hasn't bothered me due to the highly valued markets, but in the current situation my fingers are starting to itch.

I am also questioning the role of the $FGEQ (-2,72 %) in my portfolio. Unfortunately, it is performing worse than my $VWRL (-4,28 %) and is not bringing the hoped-for reduction in volatility to my portfolio and the difference in dividends is still marginal.

I am now flirting with the $JEGP (-2,51 %) as a 1:1 replacement for $FGEQ (-2,72 %) in order to achieve even more dynamic and consistent dividends to complement the $VWRL (-4,28 %) and the $TDIV (-2,46 %) out.

What are your thoughts on this? The weighting in the portfolio would be 20%.

I have now streamlined the portfolio

And only the core $VWRL (-4,28 %) as the only ETF that runs monthly with €250 per savings plan.

I sold that $FGEQ (-2,72 %) I sold it completely at Trade Republic but it can still run in the other portfolio where I topped up.

And a few shares have also been thrown out.

The ones I now have in this portfolio are being added to monthly and also bought when the prices have fallen.

Now there is much more of a system and no longer such a criss-cross pattern. Now there are reasonable growth stocks. Including consumer technology, software, insurance, banking, real estate, industrials, etc

These are all stocks that I will be holding for the next few years and that I won't be selling because I enjoy analyzing the companies and, above all, because they include major players. As they always say, you learn from your mistakes and you always have to try until you find your strategy. So as I said an ETF and the shares to hold for the long term. And thanks again for all the people who have helped me and given me tips, thanks for that 😇

Hey guys,

I'm currently thinking about my portfolio composition. I am pursuing a core-satellite strategy with the $FGEQ (-2,72 %) as core and individual stocks. I have the problem of buying more and more individual stocks... I just enjoy evaluating individual stocks and looking at companies. There are simply too many exciting companies. 🙈Do you think 25 individual stocks are too much of a supplement to my ETF?

Maybe someone has a similar "problem" and would like to share it with me?

Dear Community,

Yesterday you were able to help me quickly and effectively. I sold the tiny positions $MATIC (+0,03 %) with a considerable loss and $ETH (-0,16 %) with a small profit and set up a weekly savings plan on $BTC (-0,21 %) set up a weekly savings plan.

In order to simplify and streamline the portfolio even further, I now have the following question for you...

To help you understand my portfolio better, here is a brief explanation:

The main portfolio (currently approx. 150k) is a core-satellite portfolio with 56% $IWDA (-3,86 %) , 20% $GGRP (-4,63 %) , 12% $WSML (-5,23 %) and 12% $XMME (-0,49 %) .

With just under 20k is still the $CSPX (-4,45 %) in the portfolio.

I have also been holding a separate div growth portfolio (currently approx. 34k) with these stocks for some time:

$MMM (-6,14 %) approx. 1500€

$MSFT (-2,62 %) approx. 1400€

$ABT (-2,56 %) approx. 3300€

$JNJ (+1,02 %) approx. 2800€

$PEP (+0,6 %) approx. 2700€

$PG (-0,76 %) approx. 3300€

$TDIV (-2,46 %) approx. 3900€

$WQDS (-3,27 %) approx. 3850€

$FGEQ (-2,72 %) approx. 3800€

$VWRL (-4,28 %) approx. 3750€

$FUSD (-2,84 %) approx. 3750€

I save the ETF fraction constantly, nothing should or will change.

I'm just wondering how I should structure the ratio of individual stocks from now on. Should I increase all individual stocks to 5000€ per position or all stocks except Microsoft to 6k? Any other suggestions or ideas? If I simply leave the individual stocks untouched, the money would go into the div ETFs in tranches.

Total TER at 0.22 (which is quite acceptable for me) - and the overlaps are known and also okay for me 😄

Once again, thank you from the bottom of my heart and have a nice rest of Sunday 😎

Best regards

EvD

Continue to expand my core😊 #dividendenwachstum