$CRWV (-0,62%) Key Takeaways from the Earnings Call:

– Mike Intrator (CEO): By the end of 2027, there will be 10 times more qualified demand than available capacity. 2027 is largely sold out. Capacity for 2028 has not even officially hit the market yet, but demand for it is already several times the supply.

– Prepayments: In 70% of this year’s deals, customers paid in advance, in some cases up to 100% of the contract value. Over the next three months, CoreWeave expects approximately $9 billion in prepayments and down payments.

– Price increases: In July, prices across all GPU types rose by about 25%, followed by a further 10% later in the quarter. They will continue to rise in the fourth quarter.

– Rental rates per megawatt:

Short-term contracts: over $40 million per MW per year

New four- to five-year contracts: $20–25 million per MW per year

– Older GPUs are becoming more expensive: Nvidia’s Ampere and Hopper chips $NVDA (+2,34%) were rented out at rates 30–50% higher this quarter than in the previous quarter, now exceeding the original contract price.

– Expiring contracts: Over 130,000 GPUs will become available in 2027, with another 170,000 or so in 2028. At current prices, this could generate nearly $10 billion in additional annual revenue without new investments.

– Financing: Interest expense totaled $846 million, and the net loss was $709 million. By 2027, CoreWeave aims to raise less than $5 billion in new capital at the corporate level and, at current yields, does not plan to issue unsecured bonds.

https://investors.coreweave.com/events-and-presentations/event-details/2026/CoreWeave-Third-Quarter-2026-Earnings-Call/default.aspx

$NBIS (-2,47%)$IREN (-1,31%)$ORCL (+0,95%)$MSFT (-0,56%)$GOOGL (+0,92%)$AMD (-1,38%)

$UCG (-0,69%)
$KSPI (+2,78%)
$MNDY (+0%)
$CEG (+1,35%)
$ABX (+0,51%)
$TTWO (+1,8%)
$PARA (+0,6%)
$HIMS (+0,75%)
$RKLB (-0,26%)
$IFX (-1,12%)
$SE (+0,15%)
$QBTS (+0,43%)
$ONON (-0,32%)
$RGTI (-0,03%)
$CRWV (-0,62%)
$ENR (+0,02%)
$SIE (-1,11%)
$iOS$ALV (+1,14%)
$MUV2 (+1,3%)
$NBIS (-2,47%)
$TNIE (-2,07%)
$AMAT (-0,8%)
$NU (+3,08%)
$CBRS

Every technological megatrend needs that one magical moment when all healthy skepticism is collectively set aside. Today we’re witnessing this spectacle unfold with artificial intelligence: Expectations are astronomical, future revenues have long since been mentally booked away in our minds, and data centers are springing up like mushrooms after a gentle spring rain. Everyone is in complete agreement: This technology will liberate humanity and rake in trillions. But amid all the euphoria, it’s easy to forget one tiny, ruthless truism: Visions take a hell of a long time—but bills and loans have a rock-solid due date.

The Principle of Infinite Growth

To satisfy the insatiable hunger for computing power, the infrastructure pioneer reaches deep into the bag of tricks of modern financial wizardry. He floods the market with billions in convertible bonds and high-yield debt, while simultaneously signing 10- or 15-year lease agreements as if there were no tomorrow.

The reassuring narrative sounds like pure gold at every investor conference:

Whoever builds the data centers today will collect the tolls for the entire digital universe tomorrow.

And if someone does timidly point out the gigantic mountains of debt, the manager waves it off: “Don’t worry, tech heavyweights have secured capacity for years anyway. It’s all absolutely rock-solid!”

The Deadly Trap of Convertible Bonds

Convertible bonds are particularly appealing during such hype phases because, thanks to low interest rates, they seem wonderfully cheap. The clever promise to creditors: “You’ll get almost no interest, but in return, you’ll soon convert your bonds into soaring stocks when our share price goes through the roof.”

It’s just too bad that this is the classic balance-sheet time bomb. If the stock price misses the magic target at maturity, the conversion right vanishes into thin air. And in exactly that fraction of a second, reality strikes with the force of a sledgehammer: The company is contractually obligated to repay the entire amount to investors in real, hard cash.

If the coffers are completely empty at that point—because the revolutionary AI application hasn’t yet brought in billions—it means: batten down the hatches; the bankruptcy trustees take over.

On top of that comes the second, wonderfully creative lever: The financial circular economy. Hardware giants grant data center operators lucrative vendor credit or invest capital directly in them (vendor financing) so that the operators can use that very borrowed money to repurchase expensive servers and chips in record time. This artificially drives chip manufacturers’ revenues through the roof, but at its core, it’s based on pure speculation.

When harsh reality sets in

What actually happens when the hype fizzles out? It’s simple: The laws of money are damn humorless.

• No leniency: Creditors and bondholders want to see real money on the due date—very few bakers will accept promises of a bright future or PowerPoint slides as payment for their bread rolls.

• Pricing collapse: When overcapacity suddenly looms in the market because customers are staying away, rents and prices for computing power plummet.

• Merciless major clients: Even the richest tech giants show zero loyalty as soon as cheap vacant space becomes available. They mercilessly exploit the crisis to renegotiate existing contracts downward.

• Those lovely fixed costs: Meanwhile, interest payments, cash repayments due, and long-term data center leases merrily continue, regardless of whether the servers are humming or standing idle.

The Resolution: A Brief History Lesson

Exactly this brilliant mechanism—endless revenue fantasies, tangled hardware deals, billions in convertible bonds, and outrageously expensive, long-term leases—has, of course, existed before in economic history. We’re talking about the period from 1998 to 2001. And back then, too, it was a data center operator.

I’m not settling scores with today’s NeoClouds here. This is the almost tragicomic story of the company Exodus Communications in the late 1990s and how it built its highly hyped data centers back then, until reality caught up with it.

Exodus was the absolute megastar on the stock market back then. It operated the server infrastructure for the Internet pioneers of the time: Yahoo!, eBay, and Cisco. Tech giants like Intel and Microsoft , as strategic partners, provided the hardware and the funding. Exodus issued convertible bonds on a massive scale and was valued at over $32 billion. Everyone swore back then: The Internet is unstoppable; the debt will pay for itself.

What Nvidia, Broadcom, and AMD are today—key financiers and, at the same time, the largest hardware suppliers for modern cloud operators—was back then Intel, Cisco, and Microsoft, using exactly the same method: They injected capital into the market, extended loans, and, in return, equipped the infrastructure to boost their own sales through targeted vendor financing.

But then came the spring of 2000. Suddenly, it dawned on the market that monetizing the Internet would take much longer than had been simply imagined in the billion-dollar business plans and PowerPoint fantasies. The dot-com bubble burst with a massive bang, and stock prices plummeted.

This abruptly shut the door on the stock consolidation of the convertible bonds—and creditors demanded their hard cash back. Customers went bankrupt, major clients drove down prices, and the coffers were empty. In September 2001 —a mere three years after the triumphant IPO—Exodus was bankrupt and filed for bankruptcy. The shareholders’ money had simply vanished.

What We Can Learn From This

The parallels to today’s NeoClouds are striking. The technology may sound fancy today, but the fundamental mathematical laws of interest, fixed costs, and the harsh reality of failed convertible bonds haven’t changed one bit since 1998.

​“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” (M. Twain)

$IREN (-1,31%)
$CRWV (-0,62%)
$NBIS (-2,47%)
$HUT (-0,24%)
$CIFR (-0,11%)

​The geopolitical screws in the global AI race are being tightened drastically. Anyone who thought that U.S. export bans on cutting-edge hardware—such as NVIDIA’s AI processors—could be circumvented through clever cloud leasing in third countries is now in for a rude awakening.

​Published on November 4, 2026 , the collapsed 7-billion-dollar deal between Oracle and Tencent is just the beginning of a chain reaction that will particularly impact the business model of the so-called neo-clouds .

​Timeline of the Escalation: November 2026

• ​November 3, 2026 (Nvidia directive): As reported in the media, Nvidia has instructed its cloud and data center partners worldwide to lease no more than 49% of their total capacity to Chinese customers. At least 51% of computing power must be allocated to non-Chinese customers. This directive, communicated verbally through sales and regional teams, closes the loophole that previously allowed Chinese tech companies to lease AI computing power abroad.

• ​November 4, 2026 (Intervention by U.S. authorities): Under pressure from the U.S. government, Oracle’s 5-year, $7 billion contract with Tencent fell through. Tencent had sought access to approximately 100,000 high-end AI chips via Oracle data centers in Southeast Asia. Following security concerns raised by Washington and the subsequent directive from Beijing to switch to domestic chips, Oracle terminated the negotiations.

Why Neo-Clouds Are the Primary Victims

Compared to the established Big Tech hyperscalers (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud), this development hits specialized Neo-Clouds (such as $CRWV (-0,62%) , $NBIS (-2,47%) or $IREN (-1,31%)) in a vulnerable spot:

​Massive losses in existing revenue: In recent years, neo-clouds have often relied to a considerable extent on the extremely liquid demand from Chinese customers to fund their aggressive capacity expansions and debt financing. If this customer segment were to abruptly disappear due to regulatory pressure and NVIDIA’s 49% cap, a massive portion of revenue would vanish overnight.

The Mandatory Implementation (The 51% Threshold): The providers have no choice. They must strictly comply with the requirements, as Nvidia mandates audited know-your-customer (KYC) verifications. Anyone failing to meet the quota for new business risks being cut off from allocations of future GPU generations.

​The consequence: Desperate customer acquisition and falling leasing prices

​To close the looming revenue gaps and reach the quota of at least 51% non-Chinese customers required by Nvidia, the neo-clouds must now frantically acquire international customers.

​This market dynamic is predictably leading to the following developments:

• ​A race to the bottom in pricing: As dozens of providers simultaneously attempt to sell freed-up GPU capacity at breakneck speed to American, European, or Southeast Asian companies, a dramatic surplus of available computing power is created.

• ​Drastically falling leasing prices: To quickly poach major clients from the West, neo-clouds must slash their prices. Rental fees per GPU-hour will come under significant pressure in the future and drop drastically.

• ​Market consolidation: Providers with high debt burdens who have financed their hardware at high costs will suffer greatly from falling leasing prices and lost revenue.

​

The Outlook

​The AI market is finally splitting into two isolated ecosystems. While Chinese corporations are being forced to switch to domestic alternatives, neo-clouds in the West must rapidly restructure their business models. The sudden loss of high-spending customers demands swift compensation—and those who lose the price war for Western customers risk falling by the wayside during this consolidation phase.

​

$NVDA (+2,34%)
$ORCL (+0,95%)
$CRWV (-0,62%)
$NBIS (-2,47%)
$IREN (-1,31%)

$NBIS (-2,47%)

Where's the rocket?? 🚀