Subscribe to the podcast to prevent China from taking Taiwan.

00:00:00 Weekend trading stocks

00:03:40 Market environment

00:16:00 Delta Air Lines

00:20:00 LVMH, Grok AI

00:43:30 Hermès, Richemont, Kering

01:03:20 TSMC, ASML

01:26:50 Coalition agreement

Spotify

https://open.spotify.com/episode/36OedAqU7ZcTYd3PpnHRFQ?si=99nQieH0Qh6Hy1QhQ5hQzA

YouTube

https://youtu.be/QMjS235So6I

Apple Podcast

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/85-lvmh-herm%C3%A8s-tsmc-koalitionsvertrag-gratis-aktienanalysen/id1695869891?i=1000703930602

$MC (-3,48%)
$RMS (-1,39%)
$KER (+0,24%)
$DAL (-3,84%)
$2330
$ASML (-2,03%)
$GOOG (-2,43%)
$GOOGL (-2,38%)
$SPOT (-2,95%)
$AAPL (-2,31%)
$CFR (+0,39%)

I was thinking of adding new positions to my stock portfolio.

With the market down and the euro/dollar at 1.13 compared to its historical 1.06-1.08 it seems like a good opportunity at least better than a few months ago 🤷‍♂️

After reviewing the market a bit I have thought of 4 stocks that I have in mind:

• $ACN (-1,68%) at 23.5 times earnings

A company that given its status will benefit directly from all the advances in artificial intelligence with great expectations of future growth a controlled debt and a good dividend (of around 2% and with a payout ratio below 50%).

• $NKE (+0,65%) at 17 times earnings

Although the financials are not particularly good it is an investment in the brand returning to what it was, Nike's situation has gone from bad to worse, but just as it happens when companies that grow in profits are exaggerated and their price grows even more than profits and so continuously, well it is happening the same but the other way around 🙃 Profits fall but the price falls more than profits do and that makes it a buying opportunity

• $MC (-3,48%) at 19 times earnings

I am not a big fan of luxury but this company has a historical average of a Per of 25 times, after the fall of the last year I do not rule out that it can continue to fall however the situation may change, it has a good dividend with a payout ratio of less than 50% and a clear growth expectation

• $META (-3,81%) at 21 times earnings

Although if you look at the average profits in the last 5 years the Per is much higher than now, I do not believe that profits tend to decrease, it is one of the leading technology companies and I have no doubt that it will eventually recover if not on its own merits by the thrust of the market in general.

Any more suggestions or anything important to keep in mind? Let me know 👇

The French luxury goods group LVMH $MC (-3,48%) - known for brands such as Louis Vuitton, Dior and Moët & Chandon - recently presented its figures for 2024. At first glance, everything looks solid: turnover rose slightly by 1% to 84.7 billion euros. Doesn't sound bad at first, does it?

But the devil is in the detail. Profit slumped by a whopping 17% and ended up at "only" 12.55 billion euros. This result was well below analysts' expectations. It is therefore no wonder that the stock market was not exactly enthusiastic: the share price fell to around 725 euros after the close of trading.

Two areas that have been strong sales drivers in the past came under particular pressure: Wines & Spirits and Watches & Jewelry. Especially in the premium segment, where LVMH usually feels so comfortable, the wind seems to be getting a little rougher. Inflation, reluctance to spend and a weaker Chinese market are likely to play a part here.

Technically, the share now has important support zones in the 700-708 euro range and again at around 672-675 euros. If it fails to find a foothold there, further setbacks could be imminent. For traders and investors, this means that caution is advised.

In the long term, LVMH will of course remain a giant in the luxury segment. The company is financially strong, broadly positioned and can usually cushion crises well. So if you have a long-term investment horizon and are looking for a dip to enter the market, you could soon find an interesting opportunity here - provided you can live with a little volatility.

In short: LVMH is weakening somewhat, but the empire is not shaking.

I think it might be worth a closer look for long-term investors - for short-term traders, caution is currently the order of the day.

First of all: I don't want to talk down anyone's investments here. Everyone has their own strategy - that is important and right. Nevertheless, I am sharing my personal assessment of luxury stocks such as LVMH, Christian Dior, Moncler, Prada, etc.

In the years 2020 to 2023 - during and after the pandemic - the luxury sector experienced a real boom. Restrictions in everyday life, no restaurant visits, canceled vacations - many people suddenly had more money in their bank accounts that they actually wanted to spend. And what happened? The luxury companies' marketing machines were running at full speed. Influencers, FOMO, exclusivity - luxury became the new must-have.

T-shirts that might cost 1 dollar to produce were sold for 500-1000 dollars. Bags without a logo were suddenly considered worthless. And champagne only Moët, please - nothing else. You either belonged - or you didn't. Clever hype, without question. The companies were delighted. Record sales, new stores, more staff.

But now? Inflation, price rises, economic headwinds. Official inflation may be 0.3-0.4 % - in reality, we are all feeling something completely different. Housing, food, travel - everything is becoming significantly more expensive. And this is having an impact: the middle class, which helped fuel the luxury boom, is slowly returning to its senses. A Gucci shirt for 1000 dollars? No longer bought. Many items end up on platforms second-hand at a 90% discount - in the hope of getting at least a fraction of the money back.

Of course, there is always a small target group that can and wants to afford real luxury - no question about it. But the mass hype? Over in my opinion. Similar to watches, Pokémon cards, expensive wine & whiskey - it was a trend. And trends pass.

The current economic and geopolitical outlook does not exactly point to a new boom in this sector. There is also a growing awareness: Paying $1,000 for a shirt that's already crumbling after seven washes doesn't exactly seem like a smart decision to many, looking back.

I don't want to make a blanket statement here: "Luxury is bad" - on the contrary, I love beautiful things just as much. But for me, it's not an investment, it's a desire, a pleasure - like a nice car or a good watch.

Conclusion: The current weakness of LVMH & Co. comes as no surprise to me. It will be interesting to see what happens next. But my capital is flowing into other sectors for the time being.

$MC (-3,48%)
$MONC (-1,23%)
$1913 (-0,9%)
$BOSS (-0,65%)
$RMS (-1,39%)
$CDI (-1,44%)
#luxus
#luxusmarken

Significantly increased the previously small position. I'm convinced in the long term, and I particularly like things (see Apple) that I buy regularly myself😅

Starting here with: LV, Rimowa and now also Polene or Ruinart and Fendi

From a technical chart perspective, I unfortunately see a realistic chance that we could see LVMH prices below €400 again in the near future.

Sorry 🫣

$MC (-3,48%)

$RMS (-1,39%)

And I mourn every day that I bought so little Hermes back then (2024). (exaggeration)

After the results last night, I went back this morning to $MC (-3,48%) again this morning.

I'm positive about this in the long term. As luck would have it, my girlfriend wanted to go straight to the Louis Vuitton store and what can I say? It was very busy and we had to stand in the queue outside the store for 20 minutes. As a shareholder, I am pleased to see that the brand is not losing its appeal and that there is enough interest.

While we were waiting, countless happy customers came out with orange Louis Vuitton shopping bags. So sales in the coming quarter are taken care of 😉

Not a good day for LVMH $MC (-3,48%).

The champagne has been left in the fridge again (didn't expect to get it out either)

LVMH currently 5th largest position in my portfolio, according to the getquin Deepdive -> 3.8% portfolio share.

-40% from the all-time high and the benchmarks don't look good. I'm convinced in the long term and want to hold the position, but I'm still wondering whether it wouldn't make more sense to reallocate and enter later. Should I stay in the luxury sector or is the alternative a basic investment? I don't need the money at the moment and am thinking of holding on to it.

I'll answer this question for myself at the end of the post.

For now, here is an overview of the figures and classification. Sources: Earnings call and report presentation

(I know, dozens of others have already posted today, perhaps the classification and explanation will provide more clarity).

Overall view: Solid, but the shine is fading slightly

Turnover20.31 billion €

• -2 % reported (= incl. currency & portfolio effects)

• -3% organic (= real business development, adjusted)

Explanation:

Weak euro at the beginning of the year lifted US sales, weak yen depressed Japan, but overall it was enough for a better reporting result. Summarized at the end of the post for those interested.

Regional trends:

• Europe: +2 %

• USA: -3 % (despite good fashion performance, beauty weak)

• Asia excl. Japan: -11 %

• Japan: -1 % (base effect after +32 % in the previous year)

Explanation:

The decline in Asia is partly due to a "base effect": 2024 was extremely strong (especially in Japan due to Chinese tourists). This strong basis for comparison makes 2025 look much weaker, although the absolute level remains high.

2nd segment analysis: strengths and weaknesses at a glance

Fashion & Leather Goods (cash cow)

Turnover10.10 billion € (-5% organic)

Highlights:

• Louis Vuitton with successful Murakami collaboration (premium prices, sold out)
• New collections, change of creative directors (e.g. Givenchy, Loewe, Celine)
• Focus on "mix" strategy: sale of more expensive items instead of price increases

Classification:

Mix = higher-quality product mix, e.g. selling more €4,000 bags instead of €1,500 bags -> more sales per item and supports the margin without using official price increases.

Wines & Spirits (problem child)

Turnover1.30 billion € (-9 % organic)

• Cognac declining sharply (-17%) in USA & China
• Turnaround plan over 2 years announced, no details given, but focus is probably on stabilization & new brand activation

Watches & Jewelry

Turnover2.48 bn € (0% organic, sales stable)

• Tiffany: strong demand (Tiffany T, Tiffany Lock, Tiffany Knot, new flagship stores)
• Bvlgari, Chaumet, Fred: new collections & solid growth

Perfumes & Cosmetics

Turnover2.17 billion € (-1% organic)

• Dior: success with J'adore & high-end series "La Collection Privée"
• Guerlain, Givenchy, Aqua di Parma: new fragrances & ambassadors

Selective Retailing (Sephora, DFS, Le Bon Marché)

Turnover4.18 billion € (-1 % organic)

• Sephora: further growth in stationary retail (Brick & Mortar)
• Weakness in e-commerce, Amazon aggressive with prices... is Amazon a competitor?
• .. Yes, Amazon is a direct competitor, especially in the online beauty business
• -> Amazon is putting Sephora under pressure with aggressive prices. LVMH does not want to go along with this in order to preserve the brand value.
• DFS (duty-free stores, i.e. luxury stores in airports / tourist centers): few tourists in Hong Kong / Macau = pressure, weak figures

3. challenges in the market environment

Geopolitics & economy

• -> "In the case of tariffs, price is a lever that we are going to consider."
• "It will not be one size fits all... it can be very different depending on the brands, categories, pricing power."
• -> LV has three production facilities in the U.S., but it's rather around one third of local needs."
• "There is still capacity... we are looking at that obviously. It's something we can contemplate in a reasonable timeframe."

Interpretation:

• LVMH is not planning across-the-board price increases, but is considering them on a brand-specific basis in case tariffs come.
• LVMH is examining whether it can produce more in the USA if necessary, e.g. to avoid possible tariffs - but no immediate relocation.

• Asia: Weak demand development, but structurally intact (long-term growth of the middle class)

Buyer behavior

• "Aspirational buyers" (status-oriented middle class buyers) show restraint

• -> Demand currently weaker due to sentiment, not due to income

• -> Early indicator for cyclical decline in the luxury market

4. LVMH strategy & positioning

+ Strengths:

• Market leader with a broad brand portfolio (LV, Dior, Tiffany, etc.)
• Long-term increase in value through consistent investment in brand, stores, creativity
• Strong innovative strength in products & cooperations

- Weaknesses / risks:

• Profit growth is slowing down
• Luxury market as a whole in a "normalization phase"

5. bottom line, stay invested or reallocate?

LVMH remains a giant that invests selectively in weak cycles instead of cutting back.

Those who take a long-term view will benefit from the structural brand value.

In the short term, the share has no clear price driver in an environment of high interest rates, geopolitical uncertainty and weakening demand in Asia and the USA.

My conclusion: (not investment advice, of course 👀)

>>> Hold position. <<<

______________

What can investors who want to get in on LVMH do?

Stay patient, buy in tranches if necessary

Why?

• The company remains fundamentally strong, but is currently facing challenges (tariffs, China weakness, US risk)
• The P/E ratio is below the 5-year average (~21 instead of 31 depending on the source) -> valuation is more attractive
• The market is already pricing in many uncertainties, but a real upward trigger is currently missing
• LVMH is qualitatively first-class in the long term, but dependent on the economy and geopolitics in the short term

Strategy tip:

Enter in partial tranches (e.g. x% now, x% on setbacks) + watch out for signals (e.g. stabilization in Asia, tariffs specified, Q2 sales trend)

What should investors who are currently in the red do?

Do not sell out of panic

Why?

• The operating basis is intact, LVMH is not cutting back but investing anti-cyclically
• The valuation is no longer excessive compared to recent years
• Luxury demand is cyclical, but structurally intact
• Declines in "aspirational buyers" are sentiment problems, not structural problems

What to do instead of selling?

• Consider adding to the position to improve the entry level (if there is still conviction)
• Or simply hold and wait for the next upward phase
• Alternatives: Possibly reallocate to Hermès $RMS (-1,39%) (premium exposure) in case of returnees or Richemont $CFR (+0,39%) (adequately valued, less US risk) if you want to stay in the luxury segment. Otherwise, for example, switch to Basis Investment.

______________

Exchange rate effect explains why -2 % instead of -3 %?

In the first quarter of 2025, LVMH reported organic sales growth of -3%, but the reported growth was only -2%. The difference is due to positive exchange rate effects, mainly from the US dollar.

At the beginning of the year, the euro was weak against the US dollar, which means

Sales in the USA (e.g. with Louis Vuitton or Sephora) were converted into euros at a more advantageous exchange rate -> this lifts reported sales.

At the same time, the Japanese yen was significantly weaker against the euro. Sales in Japan (e.g. with Dior or Bvlgari) bring in fewer euros when converted, although sales in yen have not changed → this has a negative effect.

Bottom line:

The positive effect from the weak euro against the dollar was stronger than the negative effect from the weak yen. This is why the reported growth of -2% is better than the operating loss of -3%.

______________

Thanks for reading! 🤝

______________

Sources:

Audio Webcast Q1 2025 Revenue:

https://voda.akamaized.net/lvmh/2083769_67e55782ce10a/

Presentation:

https://lvmh-com.cdn.prismic.io/lvmh-com/Z_0pc-vxEdbNPBim_LVMHQ12025.pdf