$HEIA (-0,55%)
$EL (+1,17%)
$NUE (+2,92%)
$CDNS (-1%)
$WM (-1,71%)
$MSFT (-1,8%)
$V (+1,52%)
$OR (+1,21%)
$AZN (+4,05%)
$MRK (+2,76%)
$PG (+0,03%)
$SBUX (+0,62%)
$BCS (-0,29%)
$META (-1,45%)
$BABA (+1,24%)
$QCOM (+1,61%)
$AIR (-1,11%)
$HSBC (-0,45%)
$GSK (+1,15%)
$MBG (+0,15%)
$F (+1,26%)
$AAPL (+1,15%)
$AMZN (+1,14%)
$MA (+0,55%)
$7203 (-0,61%)
$SHEL (-0,52%)
$005930
$SNY (+1,46%)
$CMCSA (+2,51%)
$COIN (+2,41%)
$NET (-1,78%)
$XOM (+1,05%)
$CVX (+0,45%)
$CS (+0,71%)
$NTDOY (+0%)
$CL (+1,79%)
$DTG (+0,52%)
$UNH (+5,12%)

EssilorLuxottica
Price
Discussão sobre EL
Postos
18Quarterly figures 28.07-01.08



Sounds absurd, but it's real: Amazon knocks €100 off XR glasses with 135" display & Harman sound
Good morning my dears,
This is not meant to be an advertisement, because I am not paid by anyone and I do everything here on a voluntary basis because the community is important to me.
I want to discuss things with you again and your opinion is always very important to me.
So far, these new glasses have been more of a flop. Appel has partially stopped production and things haven't gone so well at Meta either. And Mark's dream of the Metaverse remained a dream.
It was said that "the glasses are clunky, heavy and too expensive"
But Qualcomm, among others $QCOM (+1,61%) and $EL (+1,17%) Luxottica made it possible to eliminate this problem.
The i Phone wasn't an instant hit either.
Based on the latest developments in price, weight and size, how do you see the chances of a breakthrough?
Is there perhaps even a huge market developing here?
And which companies should be able to benefit?
I look forward to your opinions and points of view in the comments.
Thank you, my dears 😘👓🕶️😎🤓🥸
The Viture Pro XR glasses are currently available from Amazon with an 18% discount. Instead of 549.00 euros, the device costs just 448.99 euros. Over 300 sales in the last few weeks and first place in the "3D glasses" category indicate a high level of interest. The deal is limited in time.
The term XR stands for "Extended Reality". This includes AR (augmented reality), VR (virtual reality) and everything in between. With XR glasses, digital content is superimposed directly into the field of vision without you being completely immersed in the real world. This creates a mixture of digital and real life.
Compared to classic VR glasses, which send you completely into virtual worlds, XR glasses such as the Viture Pro allow you to see your surroundings - and add screens or information to them. Smart glasses are also part of augmented reality, but usually only show simple content such as notifications or text. The Viture Pro goes much further: a large display, powerful sound, 3D and even a bit of a movie theater feeling.
The Viture Pro XR glasses are currently available from Amazon with an 18% discount - instead of €549.00, they cost just €448.99. According to Amazon, the device has been ordered over 300 times in the last few weeks. The offer only runs for a short time and can end at any time.
Bestseller no. 1: Are the Viture Pro XR glasses worth it?
The Viture Pro XR glasses are like a portable movie and work screen for your nose. The integrated micro-OLED display projects a virtual image of up to 135 inches, a refresh rate of 120 Hz and a brightness of over 1000 nits - enough to be able to see anything outside. Thanks to the electrochromic film, ambient light can be almost completely blocked out, which significantly improves the viewing experience.
The glasses are connected via USB-C. Many devices are supported - such as iPhone 15 and 16, Android smartphones, MacBooks, PCs, Steam Deck or the Nintendo Switch. With the SpaceWalker app, you can even use multiple virtual screens, play 3D videos or prepare presentations. So if you want, you can work just as well as watch Netflix or play games.
The glasses weigh just 77 grams, come with an aluminum housing and titanium hinges that look robust. Harman is on board for the sound - this ensures surround sound without the surroundings being able to hear. Content is not visible from the outside, which allows for privacy on the train or in a café.
In a nutshell:
Virtual 135-inch Full HD display with 120 Hz and up to 4000 nits peak brightness
Compatible with iPhone 15/16, Android, Mac, PC, Steam Deck, Switch
Electrochromic film blocks almost 100% of ambient light
SpaceWalker app for multi-screen, 3D and productivity tools
Integrated Harman sound, 77 gram weight, full metal housing
The Viture Pro XR glasses are supplied with: the glasses, a USB-C cable, a carrying case and, depending on the version, adapters. They are controlled via small buttons on the temples. If you like to watch series, play games or work on the move, this is a pretty flexible gadget - which is currently also available at a significantly lower price.
Meta presents smart glasses with sporting ambitions. $META (-1,45%)
More battery life and a new camera: Meta has presented new smart glasses in cooperation with the eyewear brand Oakley. They are not a revolution. But they show the company's aspirations.
The Facebook parent company Meta is preparing to expand its position as the market leader in smart glasses and is extending its collaboration with the eyewear group EssilorLuxottica. The companies have been jointly marketing smart glasses in the Ray-Ban design and brand since 2021. In a blog post on Friday, Meta claims to have sold "millions" of pairs of glasses to date. They now apparently want to build on this success with a new model from the Oakley brand.
(further details can be found under the link)

I think the future is promising in this respect, but judging by the pictures, the model presented still seems a bit clunky
My investable universe
When I‘m screening markets for my investable universe I look for high-quality compounders with:
- Strong and consistent capital returns (ROCE)
- High and stable profitability (gross, operating, and FCF margins)
- Steady revenue growth over time
- Large market capitalization (mature, established companies)
In detail I’m screening for:
- Market Cap: at least $ 10B
- ROCE 3-Year Avg: ≥ 25%
- ROCE 10-Year Avg: ≥ 25%
- Gross Margin 3-Year Avg: ≥ 50%
- FCF Margin 3-Year Avg: ≥ 20%
- Operating Margin 10-Year Avg: ≥ 25%
- Revenue per share CAGR 3-Year: ≥ 5%
- Revenue per share CAGR 10-Year: ≥ 5%
- FCF per share CAGR 3-Year: ≥ 10%
- FCF per share CAGR 10-Year: ≥ 10%
- Consistency/stability of earnings (from max. 1.0): ≥ 0.8
- No more than 75% revenue exposure to one single country/market (eg. USA)
Here are my current holdings:
My Portfolio
Today I‘m sharing with you my main portfolio. This doesn’t include any ETF investments and crypto currencies / gold etc. since I want to focus my presence on getquin on stock-picking.
Read my 3-part portfolio strategy posts to get the full picture - here are just the main pillars of what I‘m doing:
- Long-term buy and hold (average holding time 5+ years at least)
- Focus on high-ROIC compounders riding secular trends (top-tier capital efficiency)
- High margins, strong FCF growth, large moats (7 powers strategy)
- Holding not more than 20 stocks at a time while mainly focusing on US and EU based companies
I like to divide my holdings into „core holdings“ (forever stocks) and „trend picks“ (2030 stocks) as follows:
Core Holdings (“Forever Stocks”):
- $MSFT (-1,8%)
$ADBE (+3,75%)
$META (-1,45%)
$MA (+0,55%)
$AMZN (+1,14%)
$OR (+1,21%)
$MC (+3,11%)
$RMS (+2,32%)
$EL (+1,17%)
$BRK.B (+1,38%)
$MSCI (+2,36%)
$SPGI (+0,41%)
Growth Picks (“2030 Stocks”):
My portfolio strategy (part 3)
I use the 7 Powers framework from the book “7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy” by Hamilton Helmer. It’s a killer framework for understanding why some businesses create lasting value and compound returns over time.
Each “Power” is a sustainable strategic advantage that lets a company generate outsized returns for a long time. I ask the 7 questions for each stock I am considering to buy.
1. Counter-Positioning
- What it is: A new entrant adopts a superior business model that incumbents can’t copy without damaging their own biz.
- Example: Netflix vs. Blockbuster. Blockbuster couldn’t move to streaming without killing its DVD revenue.
- Why it matters: Creates asymmetric pressure; the old guard is paralyzed.
2. Scale Economies
- What it is: Unit costs drop as volume increases.
- Example: Amazon, Costco. Bigger = cheaper = stronger moat.
- Why it matters: Hard to compete if you can’t match their cost base.
3. Switching Costs
- What it is: Customers stick around because switching is painful.
- Example: Adobe Creative Cloud, Microsoft Office, Salesforce.
- Why it matters: High retention = stable cash flows = compounding machine.
4. Network Effects
- What it is: The product gets better as more people use it.
- Example: Meta, Visa, LinkedIn.
- Why it matters: Leads to dominance, creates a feedback loop of growth.
5. Branding
- What it is: Emotional or symbolic value, not just functional.
- Example: L’Oréal, Hermès, Apple.
- Why it matters: Lets companies charge premium prices and keeps customers loyal even if alternatives exist.
6. Cornered Resource
- What it is: Exclusive access to a critical asset — talent, IP, data, supply.
- Example: ASML (EUV tech), Novo Nordisk (Ozempic IP), Ferrari (brand + heritage + team).
- Why it matters: If no one else can get it, you win.
7. Process Power
- What it is: Unique internal processes that drive efficiency, innovation, or quality — and are hard to copy.
- Example: Toyota (lean manufacturing), Amazon (logistics, culture of innovation).
- Why it matters: Long-lasting edge baked into the org’s DNA.
If I had to chose one, Network effects would be the most important one for me.
Here are my current holdings:
Also, I think you are missing TESLA in there… ;)
Good luck my friend
My portfolio strategy (part 2)
- Concentrate on the following sectors: Tech, consumer, healthcare, financial (excluding banks), industrials
- Smallest position size 2% / largest position size 15%
- Only sell a position when it can be replaced with a position that increases the overall quality of the portfolio
- Avoid companies with little to no track record or companies going through a restructuring phase
Here are my current holdings:
My portfolio strategy (part 1)
My Portfolio is a selection of 15-25 companies which I am buying and planning on never selling. The overall criteria for my #investableuniverse are the following. I will go in-depth in another post:
- Little capital needed to run the business (high ROCE)
- High returns on invested capital (high ROIC)
- Profitability track-record with high gross margins / operating margins / high free cash flow margins
- High free cashflow growth / substantial revenue growth
- Global revenue diversification
- Low cyclicality
- #tollbooth Company - Large moat / brand name in the industry / no alternatives to the product
- Predictable sources of future growth / global trends
Here are my current holdings:
Why I am selling LVMH and betting on an ETF 🇫🇷 🥐🥖🇫🇷 🥳
The French stock market offers a large number of interesting stocks that are also very popular with investors.
Popular?
Well, yes,
Who wouldn't like LVMH, Sanofi, Air Liquid, Airbus, Safran, L'Oreal,
Essilor-Luxottica, Hermes, Danone, Pernod-Ricard and perhaps even more in your portfolio.
in the portfolio.
However, there are some hurdles and risks here.
On the one hand, we have to deal with the selection of stocks and the valuation and try to buy the stocks that we believe will rise in value at a favorable time.
Secondly, buying French shares is subject to French financial transaction tax (FTT) and 30% withholding tax on dividend distributions.
My optimization suggestion:
Instead of dealing with a large number of French shares and ending up doing everything wrong, I choose an ETF.
This has the following advantages, among others:
1 The individual share risk is spread.
2 Tax advantage for withholding tax, thanks to the double taxation agreement (see below)
3 Automatic rebalancing - the worst stocks are removed at regular intervals and new promising stocks are added to the ETF.
4 Low trading fees
Biggest disadvantage:
1 Most likely you will only achieve the average market return.
I have therefore opted for the Xtrackers CAC 40 LU0322250985 and will no longer buy French equities. Alternatively, the accumulating iShares MSCI France IE00BP3QZJ36 would also have been a good choice in my opinion.
Both ETFs offer a tax advantage, although you cannot avoid FTT. However, both Luxembourg and Ireland have a double taxation agreement with France. This means that the withholding tax on French dividends is reduced to 15%. Of course, this tax advantage applies not only to distributing ETFs, but also to accumulating ETFs.
I consider the already low TER of 0.2x% to be completely negligible, as both ETFs have had a positive TD for years.
In view of the weak performance of the current year, we could now be in a phase in which it could pay off to collect shares "cheaply" in order to benefit later from a higher personal dividend yield.
Conclusion:
I am selling LVMH and betting on the Xtrackers CAC 40 ETF to cover my entire exposure to France.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$MC (+3,11%)
$AIR (-1,11%)
$AI (+0,65%)
$OR (+1,21%)
$RMS (+2,32%)
$EL (+1,17%)
$RI (+1,15%)
$DX2G (+0,67%)
$IS3U (+0,68%)



+ 1

Mark Zuckerberg announces the end of the cell phone and presents a successor.
Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, has declared that the age of the cell phone will soon be over. He explains this by saying that many people find cell phones too inconvenient. He already knows the successor to the cell phone.
For many people, the cell phone is an everyday object and is used more than once a day for a number of things. However, Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook and current head of Meta, explained in an interview that the era of the cell phone will soon be over.
What did Zuckerberg say? In a conversation with Cleo Abram on YouTube.com, he talked about technology. And here he explained that smart glasses would become the next big platform for users. Because people want to spend their time in a more natural and social way. And cell phones would get in the way of that. So he says:
'I think the trend in IT is to become more ubiquitous, more natural and more social. So you want to be able to interact with the people around you, and I think that [smart glasses] will probably be the next important platform after cell phones.
What makes him think that? He bases his thesis on the observation that users increasingly value discretion and convenience. The glasses, which are worn directly on the face, offer a more immersive and less intrusive experience than the smartphone.
Several manufacturers have been investing in smart glasses and the Metaverse for several years now
What is the current state of development? Major companies in the industry are already investing in this area, with each presenting their own idea of smart glasses. Apple with the Vision Pro and Meta are the most prominent players, but many other companies are also working on similar projects. And Meta and HTC also offer office applications via the PC that you can use through the glasses.

Google Glasses? Google Lenses? They haven't even come close to catching on, although as someone who wears glasses I think the idea is really cool.
(Maybe like EDITH from Iron Man or Tony Stark? 😉)
Títulos em alta
Principais criadores desta semana