Hey everyone, which stocks on your watchlist are at the top of your list right now? For me, they would be:

$SU (-3,37%)

$VST (+0,44%)

$MP (-2,75%)

$285A (-13,04%)

$RMS (+1,74%)

$AAK (+0,88%) (Additional purchase)

$AVAV (-4,56%)

Part 3: The Five Categories in Practice

What This Part Is About

In Part 1, I described the origins of the 55555 system. Part 2 showed how an initial stock idea is transformed into a well-reasoned decision through research, cross-checking, and comparison. Now we’ll look at the practical side: What is the purpose of the five categories, A through E; which stocks are currently included in them; and why do they fit exactly where they are?

Part 2: https://app.getquin.com/de/post/urkWClbvSy/teil-2-wie-ich-versuche-menschliche-anlageentscheidungen-mit-einem-strukturierten-ki-research-und-control-system-zu-verbessern

Part 1: https://app.getquin.com/de/post/eJXKfiMMiJ/wie-ich-versuche-menschliche-anlageentscheidungen-mit-einem-strukturierten-ki-research-und-control-system-zu-verbessern

The categories are not a ranking from safe to risky. Each serves a different function.

A forms the broad foundation. B is intended to provide ongoing cash flow. C seeks quality growth. D allows for limited asymmetric opportunities. E is intended for tactical situations, events, and special cases. Therefore, what matters is not only whether a company is interesting, but what role it is meant to fulfill within the overall system.

The following chart shows the current confirmed portfolio following the addition of AeroVironment. It deliberately does not include share counts, portfolio values, absolute position sizes, purchase volumes, or absolute gains and losses. The goal is to make the system transparent without disclosing personal financial data.

Grab a cup of coffee or a snack, because the estimated reading time this time is 14 minutes :)

Category A: The Broadly Diversified Foundation

Category A consists of 5 ETFs.

This tier is not intended to identify the most exciting individual stocks, but rather to stabilize the portfolio, provide broad coverage of regions and companies, and reduce dependence on individual investment theses.

Therefore, there is no mechanical price limit for Category A.

The key factors are index quality, costs, diversification, liquidity, and whether the building blocks complement each other effectively.

Categories A and B are the long-term cash flow building blocks for future retirement income enhancement. For this reason, frequent buying and selling is expressly not intended here:

A replacement requires a clear deviation from the objective or a significantly better alternative that is convincing in terms of costs and risks.

Currently, Category A is fully allocated with five building blocks:

VanEck Developed Markets Dividend Leaders $TDIV (+0,48%)
- Dividend component for developed markets

Dividend and region (as of September 16, 2026): approximately 3.0 percent dividend yield, paid quarterly. Rough regional breakdown: Europe 56 percent, North America 16 percent, Asia-Pacific and other markets 28 percent.

Why include it in your portfolio: The ETF brings together established companies with a strong focus on dividends, thereby complementing the portfolio’s foundation with a clear emphasis on income.

Expectations: In the long term, it is expected to deliver robust distributions and broader diversification across developed markets.

Key risk: A focus on dividends may temporarily result in significant overweighting of certain sectors and value stocks; high dividends are no substitute for corporate quality.

L&G Global Quality Dividends $LDGL (-0,04%)
- global quality and dividend component

Dividend yield and region (as of September 16, 2026): Approximately 4.3 percent annualized based on the most recent monthly payment; the fund is still young and does not yet have a full 12-month history. Distributions are made monthly. Rough regional breakdown: North America 35 percent, Europe 29 percent, Asia-Pacific 34 percent, other markets 2 percent.

Why include it in your portfolio: This ETF combines international diversification with quality and distribution characteristics. It is intended to prevent the dividend portion of the portfolio from consisting solely of traditional high-dividend stocks.

Expectations: It is intended to provide exposure to global corporate quality while also delivering regular distributions.

Key risk: Factor strategies can lag behind the broader market for extended periods and, despite their global focus, may develop regional or sector-specific biases.

WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend
$DFE (-0,3%)
- European small-cap stocks

Dividend and Region (as of September 16, 2026): Approximately 3.7 percent dividend yield, paid quarterly. The equity allocation is almost entirely in Europe; the largest countries are the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Norway.

Why include it in your portfolio: This component adds smaller European companies to the portfolio that have little weight in major global indices. At the same time, the dividend component is maintained.

Expectation: It is intended to tap into additional sources of returns beyond global megacaps over the long term.

Key risk: Small-cap stocks are more sensitive to economic conditions, financing costs, and lower liquidity; Europe may also experience prolonged periods of relative weakness.

Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income
$FYEQ (-2,99%)
- Emerging markets with a quality filter

Dividend and region (as of September 16, 2026): 2.6 percent dividend yield, paid quarterly. Rough regional breakdown: Asia 81 percent, Europe 3 percent, Middle East and Africa 8 percent, Latin America 3 percent, other markets 5 percent.

Why include it in your portfolio: The ETF incorporates emerging markets into the portfolio without relying exclusively on the largest index holdings. Quality and dividends are intended to mitigate some of the typical risks associated with emerging markets.

Expectations: It aims to combine growth from emerging markets with a more disciplined approach to quality and income.

Key risk: Currencies, politics, regulation, and geopolitical tensions can significantly impact corporate earnings and returns as measured in Europe.

iShares MSCI ACWI
$ISAC (-1,12%)
- Cornerstone of the portfolio and thus the broad global core

Dividend Policy and Regional Breakdown (as of September 16, 2026): Reinvesting dividends, so no ongoing cash distributions; returns are reinvested in the ETF. Rough regional breakdown: North America 66 percent, Europe 12 percent, Asia-Pacific 16 percent, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and other markets 6 percent.

Why it’s in the portfolio: It covers developed and emerging markets within a very broad global equity strategy. It is the simplest and most diversified component of the system.

Expectation: It is intended to drive long-term global wealth accumulation, regardless of which individual investments are currently the focus in the rest of the portfolio.

Key risk: Even a global index does not protect against general stock market losses and is often heavily influenced by large U.S. technology companies.

Overall portfolio regions:

Category B: Cash Cows and Regular Dividends

Category B is intended to generate reliable cash flow.

A high percentage alone is not sufficient for this. Before making a new purchase, we review dividend coverage, the balance sheet, debt, the business model, capital allocation, and concentration risks. For new Category B positions, a minimum yield of six percent generally applies. Mechanical price stops are not a priority here; we sell if the dividend or fundamental thesis breaks down or if a clearly better alternative emerges.

Like Category A, Category B is geared toward long-term holding and subsequent recurring income. Price movements alone therefore do not trigger a change in position; dividend coverage, balance sheet, business model, and sustainable cash generation remain the decisive factors.

Currently, this category has a dividend yield of approximately 9% excluding any special dividends!

Cibus Nordic Real Estate
$CIBUS (+0,45%)
- Monthly real estate cash flow

Dividend (as of September 16, 2026): approximately 7.1 percent annualized, paid monthly.

Why it’s in the portfolio: Cibus focuses heavily on food and other everyday necessities. The monthly distribution and largely indexed rents align with the cash flow objectives of this category.

Expectation: The position is intended to provide predictable distributions from a defensive real estate portfolio.

Key risk: Debt levels and refinancing needs remain high. Rising interest rates, weaker like-for-like revenue, or overly aggressive growth through acquisitions would weigh on the investment thesis.

Hercules Capital $HTGC (+0,6%)
- Specialized financier for growth companies

Dividend (as of September 16, 2026): Approximately 10.8 percent based on current regular and supplemental distributions, paid quarterly. Supplemental distributions are not guaranteed.

Why include it in your portfolio: Hercules primarily extends loans to technology- and life sciences-oriented companies. Many loans have variable interest rates, which means returns can initially benefit from higher interest rates.

Expectation: The goal is to achieve an above-average current distribution from a specialized loan portfolio.

Key risk: Loan defaults, a weak venture capital environment, falling interest rates, or a deterioration in distribution coverage could put pressure on cash flow.

Vår Energi $VAR (+3,07%)
- Energy cash flow

Dividend (as of September 16, 2026): approximately 10.0 percent annualized based on the most recent quarterly payment, paid quarterly. The amount remains dependent on the commodity cycle and free cash flow.

Why include it in your portfolio: Vår Energi adds a commodities-related cash flow component to the portfolio. Production, the project pipeline, and distributions offer a different source of returns than real estate or the lending business.

Outlook: The position is expected to benefit from efficient oil and gas production as well as a shareholder-friendly dividend policy.

Key risk: Oil and gas prices, project delays, cost overruns, and political intervention make the dividend more cyclical than that of a traditional defensive dividend stock.

Capital Southwest $CSWC (-0,57%)
- SME financing

Dividend (as of September 16, 2026): approximately 10.8 percent based on the most recently reported annual payments. The regular dividend is paid monthly; supplemental dividends may be paid quarterly.

Why include it in your portfolio: Capital Southwest is another BDC component, but with its own loan portfolio and a different corporate structure. This position complements Hercules and spreads the credit risk across a second manager.

Outlook: We expect recurring income from U.S. small and medium-sized businesses and disciplined distributions from net interest income.

Key Risk: The biggest risks are credit quality, recession, falling interest margins, dilution, and a distribution that grows faster than sustainably earned income.

Chesnara
$CSN (-0,96%)
- Insurance and run-off cash flow

Dividend (as of September 16, 2026): approximately 6.5 percent based on the most recent known 12-month payments, paid semiannually.

Why it’s in the portfolio: Chesnara manages life insurance portfolios and acquires additional portfolios. This results in a cash flow profile that differs significantly from real estate, energy, and BDCs.

Outlook: The position is expected to deliver stable long-term distributions from existing insurance portfolios and disciplined capital allocation.

Key risk: Capital requirements, market fluctuations, the quality of acquisitions, and weaker cash generation could limit dividends and growth.

Category C: Quality Growth and Long-Term Compounding

Category C is intended for companies that can grow revenue, earnings, and free cash flow over many years. Quality and growth are considered separately from the initial entry point. A company can reach the “Champions League” and still be too expensive or technically unfavorable at first.

For active C positions, a 20-percent trailing rule generally applies, whereby actual broker orders and theoretical benchmarks must remain clearly separate.

An open position does not create an obligation to buy.

Nu Holdings $NU (-1,88%)
- digital financial platform in Latin America

Why it’s in the portfolio: Nu combines strong customer growth, a scalable digital platform, and the ability to offer more financial products per customer. The stock also brings regional diversification to the C-segment.

Outlook: In the long term, Nu is expected to profitably monetize its large customer base in Brazil, Mexico, the U.S., and other markets.

Key risk: Credit quality, regulation, currencies, competition, and an overly high valuation could undermine the growth thesis.

Schneider Electric
$SU (-3,37%)
- Electrification, energy efficiency, and automation

Why it’s in the portfolio: Schneider is a high-quality company positioned to benefit from several structural growth themes: rising electricity demand, data centers, automation, grids, and more efficient energy management. The stock was added following a direct comparison with several industrial and energy infrastructure candidates.

Outlook: The position is expected to benefit in the long term from the expansion of electrical infrastructure and the integration of hardware, software, and services.

Key risk: Valuation, economic conditions, integration and execution risks, as well as a significant slowdown in data center or industrial investments, are the main concerns.

Hacksaw $HACK (+2,26%)
- Growth in digital gaming and platforms

Why include it in the portfolio: Hacksaw represents a scalable, content-driven business model in the regulated online gaming sector. New games and additional markets can contribute disproportionately to earnings with relatively little capital tied up.

Outlook: The goal is long-term growth through new content, distribution, and international expansion.

Key risk: Regulatory changes, dependence on platform partners, shifting gaming trends, and a high valuation could quickly lead to a repricing of growth.

Vincorion $V1NC (-2,22%)
- Specialized energy and defense systems

Why include it in the portfolio: Vincorion complements C with a smaller German specialist that has long-term demand for robust energy and system solutions for safety-critical applications.

Outlook: The position is expected to benefit from increased defense and infrastructure investments as well as improved operational execution.

Key risk: Order delays, project and margin risks, low market liquidity, and customer concentration make the stock more vulnerable than that of a large industrial conglomerate.

RELX
$REL (+2,64%)
- Data-driven information and analytics services

Why include it in your portfolio: RELX has recurring revenue, strong data assets, and deep integration into professional workflows. Its business model is less cyclical than that of traditional industrial companies.

Outlook: The position is expected to grow over the long term through pricing, data, software, and continuous product improvement.

Key risk: An overly high valuation, regulatory issues, technological disruptions, and new AI-based competitors could limit growth and margins.

For Category C, the following applies: A C-rated position may not be downgraded to D.

If the C thesis deteriorates permanently, the position is replaced or sold within the C category.

D is not a catch-all category for damaged quality or growth theses.

A D company, on the other hand, may be upgraded to C if it demonstrably reduces its uncertainties and, in a direct comparison, better aligns with the quality and growth objectives of Category C.

It must , however, like any other security, be at least 10% to 15% better in valuation than the existing holding.

Sector Overview of the Portfolio:

Category D: Limited Asymmetric Opportunities

Category D deliberately accepts a higher degree of uncertainty. Here, we look for situations in which a successful milestone can significantly alter the company’s value, while the position size and exit strategy limit potential losses.

We evaluate the product and technology, financing, cash runway, dilution, customer or pipeline concentration, catalysts, and technical setup.

An open position does not create an obligation to buy.

NeoVolta $NEOV (-5,83%)
- small provider of energy storage systems

Why it’s in the portfolio: NeoVolta offers access to the growing market for residential and small-scale commercial energy storage. The investment case hinges on scaling, sales, and broader market acceptance.

Outlook: If growth is successful, the company could benefit from decentralized power supply, resilience, and increasing solar adoption.

Key risk: Financing, dilution, competition, the company’s small size, and its dependence on strong revenue growth make this a highly speculative position.

Kymera Therapeutics $KYMR
- Targeted Protein Degradation

Why include it in the portfolio: Kymera develops drugs designed to specifically degrade disease-relevant proteins. Successful clinical data could significantly boost the value of several programs and the entire technology platform.

Expectations: The position targets the asymmetric value of clinical progress and potential partnerships.

Key Risk: Clinical failures, side effects, binary data events, high capital requirements, and potential dilution are core risks rather than temporary side effects.

IQM Quantum Computers
$IQMX (-5,28%)
- European quantum computing technology

Why include it in the portfolio: IQM offers direct access to a strategically important future market and has operational systems, orders, and technology partnerships. At the same time, the market is still in its early stages and difficult to evaluate.

Outlook: The position is expected to benefit from growing demand for European quantum infrastructure and technological advances.

Key risk: Long development times, high financing costs, technological competition, and further capital requirements could significantly dilute the company’s value. The risk and stop-loss strategy will therefore be reviewed again.

AeroVironment
$AVAV (-4,56%)
- Drones, counter-UAS, and defense technology

Why it’s in the portfolio: AeroVironment was added following a renewed fundamental and technical review. The investment case combines a strong order backlog with growing demand for unmanned systems, defense solutions, and directed-energy applications.

Outlook: The position is expected to benefit from the transition of key programs to larger-scale production runs and from the structurally rising demand for drones and defense systems.

Key risk: Order timing, government budgets, project integration, valuation, and sharp price fluctuations could lead to significant setbacks despite strong demand.

As of today, the fifth spot in the D category is still open.

Currently, the main contenders are NeurAxis $NRXS , Praxis Precision Medicines, and Rocket Lab $RKLB (-3,91%) are being closely monitored.

NeurAxis has become significantly more attractive following technical improvements, but remains a speculative candidate due to losses, capital requirements, and potential dilution. The spot will only be awarded if quality, financing, catalysts, chart performance, and portfolio value collectively prove compelling.

Category E: Tactical Situations and Special Cases

This category is intended for swings, events, free rides, and clearly documented special cases. E is not a dumping ground for poor positions, nor is it a way to circumvent rules from categories B, C, or D. Before making a tactical purchase, the setup, trigger, risk, target, and exit strategy must be clearly defined. This category may remain empty if no compelling opportunity is available.

Desert Control $DSRT (+5,65%)
- Special Case and Grandfathering

Why it’s in the portfolio: Desert Control is developing technology to improve sandy and dry soils. The position dates back to an earlier phase of the portfolio and is not currently treated as a standard new purchase under the current D rules.

Expectation: The remaining position keeps open the possibility that pilot projects, partnerships, or commercial applications will validate the technology.

Key Risk: Early commercialization, financing, dilution, low predictability, and very high volatility make this investment unsuitable as a core position. It therefore remains explicitly a documented special case.

Teekay Tankers $TNK (-0,25%)
– Momentum Position

Why it’s in the portfolio: We have included Teekay Tankers as a tactical momentum/event position in Category E. The company is currently benefiting from high tanker rates, strong demand for oil transportation, and longer shipping routes due to geopolitical tensions. Added to this are a very solid balance sheet, high free cash flows, and a favorable valuation.

Expectations: Capitalizing on the momentum. For this reason, we do not treat Teekay as a long-term dividend or quality position, but rather as an E-position to be actively monitored with a clear exit strategy.

Key Risk: Despite these strengths, the business is highly cyclical: falling freight rates or an easing of the geopolitical situation could quickly bring earnings back to normal levels.

In addition, for the two open spots in the E portfolio, we are currently reviewing, among other things, selected “fallen angel” stocks, as well as potential rebound or event-driven setups.

Dorian LPG $LPG (+0,16%) and International Seaways $INSW (-1,28%) are examples of strong but highly cyclical momentum plays. DSV $DSV (+0,21%) would be more of a rebound or earnings event than an immediate C-buy.

Such ideas do not automatically become positions; the current chart and a predefined exit strategy are key factors.

Why the categories don’t have to be the same size

The 55555 system means five possible slots per category, not five identical positions and no rigid equal weighting.

A category may remain incomplete.

Capital is not automatically allocated to the next available slot.

First come rule violations and risk control, then vacant slots, the best candidates, and only then possible replacements or additional purchases.

Nor is a replacement made simply because a new name seems more modern or stronger in the short term. A candidate must demonstrably outperform the existing position and improve the overall portfolio by approximately ten to fifteen percent, or replace a clear rule violation. As a result, the category structure does not become an automated trading system, but rather a framework for disciplined decision-making.

The rulebook clearly states that no single sector may account for more than 30% of the portfolio!

This limit includes ETFs as well. So it can happen that a truly good stock can no longer be purchased—due to the sector cap—to avoid creating concentration risk.

What Has Changed Since the Start

The basic idea behind the five tasks has remained the same, but the practical implementation has become more precise. Category E is now active. Balance sheet, debt, and concentration are mandatory review criteria. Champions League, Reserve, Watchlist, and Top 3 Alternates distinguish quality from current buyability.

The Masterbook and Master Status ensure that new decisions, sales, and exceptions do not get lost in old chats and works.

It was particularly important to realize that a system does not improve simply by mechanically applying every rule.

A stop, a score, or an open slot is only part of the decision.

Data quality, company context, portfolio utility, and human judgment remain indispensable.

Preview of Part 4

The fourth and final part focuses on control and further development:

How Masterbook, Master Status, daily closing, lists, transaction history, dividend log, and catalyst calendar work together. I’ll also show how errors, conflicting data, and new information are handled and where the limits of an AI-powered system lie.

Part 3, too, describes exclusively my personal development and decision-making process. It is neither investment advice nor a solicitation to buy or sell securities.

I look forward to questions, suggestions, and constructive criticism. I find it particularly fascinating to see what roles other investors assign to the components of their portfolios and how they distinguish between long-term quality, ongoing cash flow, and limited speculative opportunities.

I’m 18, taking my high school graduation exams, have a long-term investment horizon, and am willing to take on a higher level of risk. With Claude’s help, I’ve put together a potential portfolio where I’d like to invest my money, since I’ve saved about 4,500€ through my job and other sources.

Component 1: The ETF Savings Plan as a Foundation

For some time now, I’ve been contributing €120 per month to a FTSE All World ETF and have already built up a base of €720 in it.

• Existing positions:

Microsoft (€515, +28%)

Amazon (€260, +30%) -> considering selling

Sofi Technologies (€245, -2.5%)

HubSpot (€188, -6.4%)

Lemonade (€170, -16%)

Building Block 2: The New Growth Portfolio (€4,500)

For my growth portfolio, I’m deliberately **not** investing €4,500 in other well-known mega-caps that haven’t yet been fully priced in by everyone:

$MPWR (+2,21%)

$PODD (-0,88%)

$HUBS (-0,47%)

$AVAV (-4,56%)

$VRT (-0,62%)

$SOFI (-1,83%)

$LMND (-5,38%)

I’m always open to suggestions for improvement and feedback😄

The ETF savings plan remains the actual foundation of my wealth-building strategy—everything else is a deliberately riskier supplement on top of that, not the other way around.

$AVAV (-4,56%)

The focus is on the E-HEL (Enduring-High Energy Laser) program for countering drones.

AeroVironment’s LOCUST X3 is set to enter mass production.

The LOCUST X3 is equipped with a 30-kW laser and is intended for use against drones in Groups 1–3 (such as the Iranian Shahed-136).

According to AeroVironment, this is the first production contract in U.S. history for a directed-energy weapon system.

I’ve re-entered the market with a small position, because shooting drones out of the sky for $5 per shot instead of using extremely expensive interceptor missiles (whose stockpiles are dwindling anyway) could be a real game-changer.

The aerospace and defense sector now accounts for about 8% of my investment capital. Although some companies in the industry are already in the $HMWO (-0,84%) , $TDIV (+0,48%) or the $VHYL (-0,17%) portfolio, they were nevertheless added as individual stocks due to their long-term trends and future prospects.

These are $LMT (-1,57%) , $NOC (-1,01%) , $AVEX and $AVAV (-4,56%)

The defense sector is booming for the first time since 1990 due to global conflicts and looming crises—order books are full, jobs are being created, and new plants are being built. Countries are arming themselves with drones, among other things, as well as other equipment and systems, ever since they’ve seen what these are now capable of. Defense capabilities against drones, cyberattacks, and hybrid warfare also play a massive role and require nations to arm themselves against these threats.

In addition to the current boom, however, this industry is also interesting for another reason: it is quite recession-proof due to its customer base. Furthermore, there are high barriers to market entry, few competitors, and the customers are almost exclusively governments—which also have maintenance and upgrade contracts in place for decades to come—and, last but not least, a certain level of trust among users in the systems’ performance.

Even though one might sometimes get the impression that NATO is falling apart, many systems and pieces of equipment are still compatible with one another—or are intended to become so in the future—which greatly expands the list of potential customers.

Disadvantages of the industry? A high concentration of customers, development risks, export restrictions, political interference—sometimes sensible, sometimes less so—and if a company falls behind technologically, it could very quickly lose ground.

While $LMT (-1,57%) and $NOC (-1,01%) have been established in the industry for years and are growing through scaling, diversification, and expertise, $AVEX and $AVAV (-4,56%) represent, in my view, the future of military development and thus represent a growth bet on nations’ drive to deploy autonomous systems in crisis zones.

My conclusion is this: Anyone who actively chooses to include defense industry stocks in their portfolio accepts an ethical dilemma, but benefits from tremendous predictability, structural tailwinds, as well as technological change and the associated government spending.

Final Thoughts:

If world peace were to break out tomorrow—then, by the way, I would be more than happy and more than willing to pay the price for it in the form of losses!

*contains AI-generated images*

due to some negative news like.

• New contract awarded by the U.S. Space Force
• Quarterly figures below expectations
• Forecast reduction

I also see more and more new drone players coming onto the market. Whether it's the big ones like Kratos, Rheinmetall, etc. Or smaller start-ups. I think a lot will be about price in the future, which will put pressure on margins.

And in the worst case, the "Novo effect" could even occur here.

"Novo effect" could occur.

That's why I'm out of the growing market (which we also have for slimming products), but now also a highly competitive market.

After $AVAV (-4,56%) lost 17% out of nowhere at the beginning of March, a first bottom was formed at $196.29, which may have been confirmed today after trading hours due to earnings at $196.20.

Those who are willing to take risks but trade in a structured manner or have set the buy limit in this area should set the SL at around $194 if old longs are still being fished out. The risk/reward ratio would be immense.

If you want to play it safe, you can wait for the retracement of the 1st wave in the 1h. Would expect a strong uptrend, i.e. 0.382 retracement rather than golden pocket :)

$AVAV (-4,56%)

My dears,

I will remain invested here as well.

The US Army is looking to new drone ammunition - and AeroVironment is the supplier. The defense company has received an order worth 186 million dollars for its Switchblade systems. Particularly explosive: for the first time, the Pentagon is ordering the latest generation with improved anti-armor protection.

Two systems, one mission

The order includes the Switchblade 600 Block 2 and the Switchblade 300 Block 20 - both variants are equipped with an explosively formed penetrator (EFP). This warhead technology is specially designed to combat armored targets and is being used by the US military for the first time in AeroVironment systems.

The smaller Switchblade 300 Block 20 scores with a modular payload architecture, while the larger 600 version focuses on range and endurance. The system combines long flight times with improved anti-armor effectiveness - a direct upgrade over its predecessors.

Part of a billion-euro framework

The current award is embedded in a framework contract worth 990 million dollars, which was awarded in August 2024 and runs for five years. AeroVironment has thus secured strategically important access to the US armed forces' procurement system. The fact that the army is now ordering the latest generation of the Switchblade family confirms its confidence in the further development of the platform.

AeroVironment Aktie: Großauftrag vom Pentagon () | aktiencheck.de