Due to high volitality and a 17% flash crash in 90minutes yesterday, i decided to pull out my initial investment to lock in some gains.
The remaining part i will keep running.

Posts
21The most common pushback against the bullish silver thesis is: “Don’t worry, solar will just switch from silver to copper.” How plausible is that?
Alexander Campbell (ex Head of Commodities at Bridgewater) frames it this way:
🔻Demand destruction threshold
• He puts the “break-even / where demand destruction even begins” around $134/oz (not a price target, but the level where the squeeze starts to bite).
⏳ The bottleneck is time (not money)
• Rough math: ~300 factories worldwide, ~1.5 years to convert each to copper plating, and ~60 factories/year parallel capacity --> ~4 years minimum to reach 50% copper adoption.
💸 Even if economics scream “do it”…
• Around $125/oz, payback drops below 1 year, but “deciding tomorrow” still doesn’t compress the industrial timeline (physics/operations > incentives)
🛠️ Not plug-and-play
• Switching to copper isn’t a simple input swap; it requires process/design changes, manufacturing workflow changes, and retraining/qualification.
🔁 The mix effect (PERC → TOPCon → HJT)
• While copper is discussed, the tech mix shift can increase silver intensity on average (he cites ~13.5 mg/W in 2025 vs ~15.2 mg/W in 2030).
✅ Bottom line
Copper may be the long-term “end state”, but it’s unlikely to be an immediate kill switch. Silver can move faster than the PV supply chain can retool.
https://www.campbellramble.ai/p/10-silver-days-of-christmas
$SSLN (+7.22%)
$SILG (+1.2%)
$PHAG (+6.72%)
$XAD6 (+6.79%)
$SIVR (+0.97%)
$SLV (+1.08%)
$SIL (+0.94%)
$SILJ
$PAAS (+0.02%)
$AG (-0.98%)
$EDR (+1.64%)
$SVM (-0.8%)
$MAG
$HL (-3.59%)
$SAMG
$AYA (-4.37%)

Last week, i've doubled down my position on the popular telecom stock $TMUS. (-2.51%)
Many people have recently saying $TMUS has an insanely strong resistance level at $195, where it indeed hasn't fallen through (yet). Historically, telecom stocks have been steady stocks with little drastic crashes in stock price.
Yet, $TMUS (-2.51%) has recently experienced a sharp downtrend in it's share value. In my opinion, this could be explained by the stepping down of it's CEO, a natural correction, or perhaps some fear of a stall in earnings growth in the following earning report(s).
Considering it's strong resistance and historical steady and reliable uptrend, even during recessions and Trump's tariffs, it seems -in my opinion- a great share to buy for medium- to long term holding.
At the moment, my portfolio holds about 50 shares of $TMUS with an average share price of ~$198.
With the sharp, explosive rise in $PHAG (+6.72%) value, i believe this necessity stock will hold strong in a possible upcoming recession (this usually happens after a great rise in precious metal prices, which we are seeing right now). My position is mostly a gamble without much technical analysis (for the long term, technical analysis isn't that important for steady stocks like $TMUS or REIT'S like for example $O (-0.05%) ).
How are you feeling about $TMUS (-2.51%) at it's current share value? Still overvalued? Or much room for (long term) growth?
Rising industrial demand, rigid supply and a market in continuous deficit since 2020.
⚡ The photovoltaic boom isn’t slowing down: total silver demand is expected to reach between 48,000 and 54,000 tonnes per year, with the solar sector alone accounting for up to 40% of global consumption.
⚒️ On the supply side, 72% of silver is produced as a byproduct, and any new primary mine takes nearly a decade to come online. Supply elasticity is almost zero.
Even after factoring in more recycling and lower silver intensity per solar cell, the model shows that by 2030, supply would cover at best 70% of demand — leaving a gap that someone will have to fill… or that prices will eventually correct for.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921344925004392
$SSLN (+7.22%)
$SILG (+1.2%)
$PHAG (+6.72%)
$XAD6 (+6.79%)
$SIVR (+0.97%)
$SLV (+1.08%)
$SIL (+0.94%)
$SILJ
$PAAS (+0.02%)
$AG (-0.98%)
$EDR (+1.64%)
$SVM (-0.8%)
$MAG
$HL (-3.59%)
$SAMG
$AYA (-4.37%)

$PHAG (+6.72%) Silver reached a record high yesterday.
Shortage of raw materials meets industrial demand and empty inventories. A hot combination. The gold-silver ratio suggests that prices will rise sharply. Currently my game changer.
What do you think?
Reading time: approx. 10 minutes
Many shares have performed very well recently. But where there has been nothing but upward movement for a long time, there will also be setbacks at some point. The market is currently reacting sensitively - even minor news leads to significant movements. One example is the recent concerns about the credit quality of smaller US regional banks, which triggered noticeable price losses yesterday and today.
This also raises the question of whether commodities could play a greater role again in the future - not as a substitute, but as part of a broader diversification. Especially in phases when stock markets react nervously, commodities can provide a tactical counterweight. This consideration gave rise to the idea of trading them systematically - not through emotion, but through rules.
The inspiration came from a natural gas trade that @Epi had presented. It was less exciting because of the result than because of the underlying dynamics. How can something like this be mapped using rules? When does momentum arise, when is a trend sustainable - and when does it end?
This is how the commodity rotation approach came about - an attempt to understand the movements of the commodity markets with technical discipline. The approach consistently relies on momentum: it does not aim to guess the bottom, but to accompany the strength. I have not yet tried it out in practice. But the structure is in place and it shows how a tactical, signal-based commodity approach can be constructed.
Commodities rarely move evenly. They move in waves, driven by demand, inventories, politics and currency. These movements are hardly predictable - but they are measurable. The approach therefore views the market as a rotating playing field: energy, metals, agriculture - capital constantly moves between these segments. The aim is not to predict where the next impulse will come from, but to invest where the trend is already visible. Only the strongest commodity counts - the rest is left out.
The universe comprises nine liquid underlying ETFs that can be traded via WisdomTree. Each represents its own cycle, together they form the entire spectrum of the global commodities market:
Energy, industry, precious metals and agriculture are thus fully covered - without overlaps, but with sufficient breadth to make rotation visible.
The approach follows a fixed process that is reviewed weekly. A commodity is only included if its six-month performance is positive. It is only considered eligible for activation above one percent. This is followed by the trend check: the price must be above the GD50 and the short-term average (GD20) must exceed the GD50. Only then is the trend considered confirmed. The RSI serves as a control variable. Values between 50 and 70 signal stability, above 75 overheating, below 40 weakness. If the RSI rises too sharply or falls significantly, the approach reacts automatically: overheated movements are reduced, broken trends are sold.
The strength of the trend determines the leverage. If the six-month performance is over 10 %, a triple-leveraged ETF may be used. Between 5 % and 10 %, the 2× variant is used. Below this, the basic ETF is traded - the risk increases with the strength of the trend, not with your gut feeling.
The loss limitation is also clearly regulated. With the 1× variant, the exit takes place at a loss of more than 5 %, with 2× from 10 %, with 3× from 15 %. This means that the maximum risk per position remains constant. Profit protection takes place in two stages. If the RSI rises above 75 or the price falls below the GD50, half of the position is sold, while the rest continues to run as long as the long-term trend (GD50 > GD200) remains intact. If the price falls below GD200, the entire position is sold.
All signals are re-evaluated on a weekly basis. If another commodity outperforms in the ranking, an exit is also made - the position is rotated. The approach never holds more than one position at a time.
For a better overview, the rules can also be summarized in a condensed form:
This summary shows that the approach does not rely on intuition, but on clear, repeatable decision-making logic. It is not about the perfect forecast, but about reacting consistently - that is the core of every momentum strategy.
It is easy to see how this works in practice. Climbs $CRUD (+1.13%) rises to a six-month performance of +12 %, GD20 > GD50, RSI = 63, the entry is made via the 3× ETF. If the RSI later rises above 75, half is sold. If the price falls below GD200, the complete exit follows. Or: If another commodity in the weekly ranking, such as $COPA (-2.64%) (copper), provides stronger signals, a switch is also made. In this way, the approach remains flexible, but consistently rule-based.
The commodity rotation approach is not a rigid trading system, but an attempt to bring structure to the volatility of the commodity markets. It defines when an entry is justified, how much leverage is allowed, when profits should be secured and when to consistently exit - be it through a trend break or through relative weakness compared to the rest of the universe.
I have not yet put this approach into practice. But developments have already shown how helpful it can be to replace emotions with rules. Whether it proves itself in practice remains to be seen.
What do you think of the approach?
Are raw materials missing - or could some be removed?
What do you think of the rules - are they plausible?
Let's discuss this idea.
After the long on gold reached 100% yesterday, I decided today to add another long on silver to the portfolio as part of the hedge...
Due to the low supply of silver, I still see significantly higher prices beyond € 70/80
What are your price targets for silver and gold? ✌️
If you are not interested in warrants, just keep scrolling.
The warrant has a leverage of 10, if everything goes smoothly the warrant will be held until gold cracks the $4000 mark. I also bought a 10 long on silver a month ago, but the warrant currently only has a leverage of around 6 and is up around 125% -> should be the same for gold... (The leverage on my capital invested in the silver long is still 10, just to clarify😉 )
@Multibagger You asked about my inliners... I haven't used inliners for a long time because the last ones were too small for me 🛼... xD Joking aside: I sold my inliners on ThyssenKrupp and Zalnado with gains of 70% and 120% respectively. I bought an inliner on Commerzbank DE000PJ71ZF1, on MTU DE000PJ715U4 and Siemens DE000VH3ZBV0. The inliners on CoBa and MTU are both clearly in the plus, the one on Siemens clearly in the minus, and the money is actually written off because the spread is so bold that I'm now either letting it run KO or taking the 500/600% with me. In the meantime, I also had some on Deutsche Telekom and Deutsche Börse, but both of these have been taken out via stop loss. I also added a normal long on NVIDIA...
HG KleinAnleger ✌️
Hello,
Today the silver warrant had to go...
My first trade on precious metals with a holding period of approx. 2 months has more than satisfied me. The long OS on gold posted a few days ago is of course still running. I also need cash, firstly because savings plans are running at the beginning of the month and because:
A personal question, most of you here are a bit older, so I wanted to ask you how much your driver's license cost in your day 😅 I'm currently getting bills from the driving school almost every week, so I don't have that much cash to invest... A compulsory lesson (45 min) at my driving school costs €83 🤯 If there's a listed driving school, then bring it on 😉 Currently, €3000 is the minimum for a driver's license. My grandpa and my parents gave me €3000 for my driver's license so that I would have the motivation to pass everything the first time. I have to pay for anything over €3000 myself, which is not a big problem now because of the size of the deposit, but it should serve as motivation. I believe that investing in a driver's license is much more beneficial than investing in any stock or crypto ✌️ What do you think? Would you do the same? And how many euros, or for some here probably even DM 🤭, did you spend on your driver's license? Lg
$SSLN (+7.22%)
$PHAG (+6.72%)
$4GLD (+1.82%)
$GLDA (+1.74%)
$IGLN (+1.62%)
Top creators this week