I've been looking through my portfolio and realized that I'm a bit thin in the financial sector.

Instead of focusing on one or two individual stocks, I came across these ETFs in a search as an addition to the MSCI or S&P500.

They don't look too bad in terms of performance.

Does that make sense? Or is this just another sector ETF?

$BNKE (+0,29 %)

$IUFS (-0,42 %)

$XDWF (-0,2 %)

Whereby I would like the $IUFS (-0,42 %) or the $XDWF (-0,2 %) as it includes Berkshire, although these are actually also included in the MSCI World or S&P 500, albeit with a higher weighting.

Or the $BNKE (+0,29 %) ? That would reduce my USA exposure somewhat.

Thanks for your feedback

Hello dear Gequin Community,

I am currently working on restructuring my portfolio. Historically, I currently have a few funds and a number of individual shares.

I would like to switch the funds to ETFs and continue to save in them.

Classically, I would now select the following ETFs:

$VWCE (-0,52 %) / $VHYL (-0,41 %) and $VFEG (-1 %)

Now my little thought experiment: Why should I limit myself to three ETFS when I could spread the whole thing much more widely? I have also thought about something like this (with smaller sums, of course):

$WELS (-0,18 %)

$ECOG (-0,31 %)

$EXH5 (+0,17 %)

$CHIP (-0,83 %)

$DFEN (-2,05 %)

$XDWF (-0,2 %)

$RBOT (-0,82 %)

$XAIX (-0,94 %)

$IH2O (-0,27 %)

$WELW (-0,09 %)

Of course I have a few duplications here, but I am much more differentiated.

Does this approach make sense in your eyes or is it a modest idea?