2D·

Aug 11 / Chips, Chips, Chips

A Creative Deal


The semiconductor giants Nvidia and AMD have agreed to pay the Trump Administration 15% of sales made in China. Yes, you heard correctly. The U.S. President is lifting trade restrictions for advanced chip exports to China, after a rather peculiar deal was struck.


Interestingly enough, this completely contradicts Trump’s stated goal of isolating China globally and slowing down its progress in the AI race. “What for?”, is an appropriate question. That’s pocket change for the treasury, though potentially a massive boost for China’s innovation. Surely, it wasn’t Jensen Huang’s charm that moved the president.


I have been critical of some of Trump’s steps in the past, and while many these moves were double-edged, this one I truly don’t understand. He is giving away, or at least sharing, a technological edge, after having alienated the whole world already. So, you can’t argue that it’s a gesture of goodwill. You don’t run into a bar, shoot five people, and then offer them a beer for their troubles. That’s likely how China will take it as well – a desperate gesture from an out-of-control administration.


For AMD and Nvidia, however, it’s a major win, though it should be pointed out that 15% of all China sales is a strange metric, since it doesn’t consider costs and efforts for making or selling the products. But we are already used to oversimplified calculation methods, since April 2.


Nevertheless, I am sure that Jensen Huang is partying with a great feeling that $20 billion of his company’s revenue is safe – at least for now.


ASML – Short Summary of My Latest Analysis


Yesterday I published a full breakdown of ASML, an exceptional company, undervalued and misunderstood by the market. I’ll briefly outline my key points for an investment case here; if you are interested, check out the complete report on my profile:


ASML is a monopoly. The company is the ONLY supplier of EUV litography machines. These machines lay the foundation for the production of the most advanced chips worldwide. Every major foundry is dependent on ASML’s technology. If they stopped servicing their machines or slowed innovation, the global chip industry would go back to the Stone Age.


People love to talk about Nvidia and AMD, but the truth is that you can forget the AI revolution without ASML. This gives the company enormous pricing power, which it further strengthens by striking exclusive partnerships with suppliers or simply buying them outright.


So, what do you get that for? A 40 P/E? 50, maybe? No, ASML’s stock is trading near multi-year lows at a 25 forward P/E ratio, representing as close to a no-brainer buy for the next five years as you can get.

attachment

$NVDA (+0,29%)
$AMD (+0,61%)
$ASML (-0,48%)
$ASML (-0,62%)
$2330
$TSM (-0,24%)
$INTC (+0,82%)
$005930

7
15 Comentários

imagem de perfil
Now he's already imposing 15% tariffs on his own chips.
What can you say except:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5sTTlph2Vk
3
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost So far, things are going quite well for him and the USA, which is more than can be said for many European countries (not counting Poland). Milei is also doing a great job in Argentina. (You just don't hear anything more about it in our media over here... A rogue who thinks evil of it).

Do you really think that the people behind these measures don't realize what impact the tariffs can have? Pretty naive and arrogant, I would say.
2
imagem de perfil
@Baraccus "Previously" is the key word.

And if you ask me so directly... yes, I don't think some people in the cabinet realize it. Because Trump has brought in a lot of clowns in addition to some knowledgeable people.

Or how do you explain Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services?
Or Pete Hegseth as Minister of Avoidance?

By the way, I wouldn't lump Trump and Milei together.
Milei is a liberal who is in favor of free markets.

And Trump... well, let's just say that tariffs and free trade are not the best of friends and are more autocratic than liberal.
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost I find it amusing and telling that everyone wants to understand more about politics, tactics, negotiations and the tariff issue and thinks Trump and co. don't know what negative effects this could have in the long term.

That they could be used as a means to an end seems completely impossible in the minds of many people. This naivety and hubris makes me feel ashamed.

Trump and Milei are certainly comparable. This is already evident in the fact that they are seen as right-wing populists by many left-green dominated governments. They are both movers and shakers who swim against the mainstream and don't play the flag in the wind like a turncoat like Merz in Germany.
imagem de perfil
@Baraccus You seem to have understood it and I haven't. Then please enlighten me.
What does Trump intend to do with the tariffs? Are they going to change all the time? Will they be cemented at some point or will they disappear again?
And how does he intend to minimize the negative effects?
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost "You seem to have understood it and I haven't." 🙄 You know, it's precisely this kind of you that doesn't exactly inspire me to have really in-depth arguments with you.

You've often shown that you have a very specific left-wing and "woke" orientation when it comes to your political views.

This allows you to swim along wonderfully in the current mainstream and this gratuitousness is also comfortable. I can only advise you to delve a little deeper into the topic and not leave it at the superficial observations that wonderfully support this world view.
2
imagem de perfil
@Baraccus then help me to help myself.
Where would you start if you wanted to delve deeper into Trump's customs issues?
Please be specific, there seem to be sources that I don't look at, but you do.
1
imagem de perfil
@Baraccus So that is actually not meant disrespectfully.

We were already at the point where you tried to explain to me that I should try to look for information outside the "mainstream".

However, you always remain deliberately vague.

I still don't know what falls into the "mainstream" for you. And what thinking outside the box means to you.

The fact that you have repeatedly been unable or unwilling to define where you got your information about Trump's intentions, economic policy and its implementation leads me to make an assumption.

...

I think you are aware that the data quality of your source is not the best.
Or that the source confuses opinions and facts.

Of course, the opposite of what I just wrote could be quickly refuted with the appropriate sources. 😁
imagem de perfil
@Baraccus he just has a little problem... See DoGe... They wanted to drain the swamp too quickly 🙏
1
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost Only now do I see what nonsense and unsubstantiated claims you have written again.

So you know my sources and my data so that you can claim that the quality of my data is "not the best" and that I am confusing opinions with facts?

You're doing exactly what is typical of your bubble and why, from experience, it's not worth investing the time to take you by the hand and bring you back to reality with data that doesn't appear in your feed willingly and probably deliberately.

You do realize that I can't do the work for you here of thinking outside the box and dealing with more than your superficial defamations and mainstream-compliant opinions and "facts", right? I didn't acquire this knowledge in 5 days and some little diagrams in puff forums either, as is probably floating around in your mind.

But every now and then I am tempted to show your mostly defamatory and malicious postings here a different perspective, to put it politely.
imagem de perfil
@Baraccus but where you got the knowledge from, you still don't say...

And then you wonder why you can't have a sensible discussion.

We could cut all this short if you could just show me what supports your assumptions.
But I don't know why that's such a big secret.

Oh yeah, I just haven't addressed this "woke bubble" issue yet because I thought if I ignored it, it would stop on its own.
But since you kind of got into it:

I have one or two acquaintances in the Leipzig Antifa and they always act like I just crawled out of Christan Lindern's ass.

So if I'm too liberal for the left-wing extremists and too left-wing for you, then I'm probably in a very stable political position. Especially as I also have more conservative acquaintances and can somehow relate to most of them.
Contrary to your description, I am not a living cliché that can only have progressive or conservative points of view. I am already able to take a progressive stance on topic X and a conservative stance on topic Y. I can also distinguish between well thought out and well done.
And I can also change my mind when the facts change.

"But why do you see the mote in your brother's eye and do not perceive the beam in your own eye?" (Matthew 7:3).

What the Lord is trying to tell us is that it is always the others who are in the bubble.
It was like this 2000 years ago and it hasn't changed to this day. 😜
Ver todas as 3 restantes respostas
imagem de perfil
Participar na conversa