3Wk·

Welcome...Part 3

...in contrast to the $JEGP (+0.39%) in my opinion, runs much more quietly without a larger CC and, although not monthly, brings in even more on a quarterly basis.

16.09
€2,341.50
10
17 Comments

profile image
I have that one too. It's a good one. 👍
4
@Olli68 0.77 TER is really high …
profile image
@Dividentology It's activ managed. Therefore higher than passive managed ETFs.
1
profile image
@Dividentology it isnt 0.77 TER it's 0.35 TER always double check GETQUIN numbers.

Really agree it's a high potential ETF (in combination with JGPI)
profile image
Noiseless, because sideways since 1 1/2? And 0.77% costs are not exactly cheap either 👻
3
profile image
@felipeestupendo is recovering, however, and thus offers an even higher return, irrespective of the already higher dividend 🤫
3
profile image
@felipeestupendo this is wrong here at GQ- Are 0.35 ter as with the JPMs....
1
profile image
But you also jump on every bandwagon. Back and forth. But it's your business. Not that you'll push him off again tomorrow 🤣
3
profile image
@ScorpionfromBW Well, back and forth is relative in this case... even if not every horse is a winner, the added value was reinvested profitably and even if I leave the pitch with a draw, the added value remains....

...better actively managed than passively chasing 😉
3
profile image
I think in the end you will decide in favor of the $TDIV...
3
profile image
I also have the $WINC - in combination with the $TDIV. I don't think the JEGP is wrong either, but I think it's suffering a lot because of the dollar and that will change again in the long term.
2
profile image
@NichtRelevant What I like about $WINC is that it is not based purely on CC.

Unfortunately, $JEGP continues to go downhill even without the dollar, and the payouts can't keep up in the long term...
1
profile image
Unfortunately not true. The ETF does indeed use CC (index call options). Futures are also used.
1
profile image
@Yield-Ahead...can, but does not have to, be a completely different strategy than a pure CC.
1
How does the ETF pay a 10% dividend without CCs if it contains low dividend companies like NVIDIA or Apple?
profile image
@Fred999 You're absolutely right, what it says at the top of the introductory text is wrong. It uses CC.
3
profile image
@Yield-Ahead but not alone, is not based on it, is recovering, albeit slowly, from April and continues to pay out stably 🤫 ..have edited the introductory sentence again 😉
Join the conversation