I also think there's a bit too much gold, I think you're still young, you could still save s&p or nasdaq 100 or 200, over 30 years they'll beat every index anyway
•
22
•
@Trilly424242 The higher proportion of BTC in the portfolio is intended to generate higher returns😉. Gold, in a corresponding admixture, only lowers the vola (considerably). Since my investment horizon is 10 years+ (and not necessarily 30 years), NASDAQ is too heavy for me in terms of vola, DD and dependencies. Until recently, I had the S&P 500 alongside a FTSE All World, which actually only led to artificial risk concentration with higher volatility and a poorer risk/return profile. In my view, however, the most important argument against this is that the US has performed disproportionately well in the past, but who is to say that this will continue for the next 10 years +? I would make my portfolio unnecessarily one-sidedly dependent, which I no longer really like.
•
11
•Of course, that's all in the crystal ball. Personally, I still can't imagine that Europe or the rest of the world will do better than the USA, but otherwise respect for the portfolio and the considerations. I will also get more information in the next few days.
•
22
•@Trilly424242 Thank you very much for your comments and Lob🙏🏻.
•
11
•