5Mês·

Global Quality Dividend Growth

I had included this ETF $GGRP (+0,29%) in my portfolio at the time because the overall performance was supposed to be very good. In the meantime, and mainly because of the dividend cut some time ago, it is lagging behind quite a bit in my portfolio. Is this due to the market situation and there will be times again when it performs better than, for example, the $VWCE (+0,24%) or is the ETF simply no longer as attractive?

I still have the $FGEQ (+0,3%) which performs significantly better. I'm thinking about $GGRP (+0,29%) out and reallocate.

8 Comentários

yieldhunter@randomdude

5Mês

I continue to bet on both. The poor performance and the falling distribution are mainly due to the weak dollar.
The ETF concept is still good. There's no point in constantly changing horses. Sometimes $GGRP is a little ahead, sometimes $FGEQ.

•

Ver todas as 3 restantes respostas

TotallyLost@TotallyLost

5Mês

They run almost the same, one sometimes better, the other sometimes worse...
https://extraetf.com/de/etf-comparison?products=IE00BYXVGZ48-etf,IE00BZ56RN96-etf,IE00BP3QZ601-etf

In the end, these are both quality factor ETFs that track the factor in different ways.
If the factor does not perform, neither do the ETFs on it.

But I can guarantee you one thing: if you sell parts of your portfolio because they have performed poorly temporarily, this is a guarantee of underperformance.
You should actually be buying more of them now.

Google it:
"rebalancing" and "mean reversion" 😘

•

Mostrar resposta

Dividenden Dompteur@Dividenden_Dompteur

5Mês

I suspect that the cuts are mainly related to the inclusion of Meta and Google. They hardly pay any dividends (yet), but should increase substantially in the long term.

•

Maximilian@Max095

5Mês

$FGEQ 🚀

•