3D·

CoIQ Collective Intelligence Fund -> Is CoI the better AI?

Hello dear community,

Today I would like to introduce you to a unique fund that has not only outperformed the MSCI World, but is also innovative / sensible and, you may not believe it, comes from Germany.


It is about the $U5W0 (+0,46%)

"CoIQ Collective Intelligence Fund"

WKN: A3C91C / ISIN: DE000A3C91C5


It is well known that there are investors who beat the market. One problem, however, is that most of them do not succeed in the long term and it is often only after the outperformance that you can see which investors were the best.


If it were possible to measure / quantify investor skill and derive from this which investors have a high probability of outperforming in the future, it would be possible to copy their positions and thus beat the market.


The stock market game informunity.de was launched for this purpose in 2008.

The difference to other stock market games: There are no certificates, no penny stocks and it has no end.


The aim is not to find the top performers over a short period of time, but to find investors who outperform over several stock market cycles.


Investors have 300 stocks to choose from at any given time:

https://www.informunity.de/stock_modifications.p


An index is formed from these shares, the "informunity share index".

IMPORTANT: This index is NOT what the fund tracks, it merely serves as a benchmark against which the participants are measured.

https://www.informunity.de/static.php?M=iax


There are several paper portfolios in which you can select shares from different investment universes.


Basic portfolio - 10 shares out of 300

Buy and sell possible on the next trading day


Hold portfolio - 10 shares out of 300

5 must be held until the end of the year

5 must be held until the end of the quarter


Short portfolio - 10 shares out of 300

Position value changes inversely to the share price.


Value portfolio - 10 out of 230 shares

Exclusion of the most expensive shares (value + blend)


Growth portfolio - 10 shares out of 150

Stocks with the strongest growth


Risk portfolio - 10 shares out of 300 + cash account

Minute-by-minute trading possible, various order types, position size freely selectable


There is also

  • a prediction game where you can vote on how the index will perform on the following day
  • A multi-asset portfolio (shares, Bitcoin, commodities, bonds, gold, real estate, cash)
  • a (challenging) quiz


The performance of the base and hold portfolios is used to calculate a score for each player, the so-called IPQ (Investment Performance Quotient).

https://www.informunity.de/static.php?M=ipq


The 300 investors with the highest IPQ are called top investors.

However, their position is not set in stone; any user can move up or down.

Why should investors participate voluntarily?


Firstly, many people have the urge to compare themselves with others.

In addition, people with an affinity for the stock market often act out of a kind of intrinsic motivation. What feels like work for one person may be fun for another.

But I don't have to explain that to you in the financial bubble, because you enjoy watching stuff every day that others would be bored to death by.


There are also credits as an incentive if you do certain things or achieve certain goals. If you have 3000 credits, you can have them paid out as a €30 Amazon voucher.

How do you classify this?

I can say from personal experience:

In my best quarter I had made 2100 credits, but normally it's more like 400 - 700 credits per quarter.

(My IPQ is in the top 5-10% ... and yes, that's a flex 💪)


---------------------------------------------------------------

Are you still with me? Haven't fallen asleep yet?

Well, then it's time for a short commercial break from our sponsor, without whom none of this would be possible:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E77R0e5bzIs

Disclaimer: This is not a political statement. No British people were killed or injured during filming.

Thanks to "Juice That Makes Your Head Explode" and thanks to all the readers who clicked on the link, now on to the fund.

---------------------------------------------------------------


A portfolio is then formed from the portfolios of the top 300 investors with the highest IPQ, which the fund attempts to replicate.

The aim is to achieve an equity allocation of 100%.


Although this is legally a UCITS fund, the UCITS rules are deliberately interpreted offensively and pushed to their limits.

The top holdings (such as NVIDIA, Rheinmetall or Siemens Energy) are often close to the 10% mark. Although there are 100 stocks in the fund, the top 10 stocks account for more than 50%. [As at 01.05.2026]


There are no clear rebalancing days, reallocations take place dynamically if the portfolios of the top investors deviate too much from the fund portfolio.

The historical performance is impressive.

The top investor portfolio has been in place since 2016 and has made 19% p.a. in that time, compared to the ACWI, which only achieved 12.1% p.a. returns.

attachment

Points of criticism and risks:

It is very clear that the UCITS wrapper was only chosen here for regulatory reasons; this is not a diversified world ETF, but a highly concentrated portfolio that loses more on setbacks and (hopefully) profits more on rises.


The equity universe is limited; as the fund must be able to rebalance quickly, only highly liquid stocks that are tradable on Tradegate are available.


The fund's internal trading costs can fluctuate greatly depending on the stock market phase.

In the event of structural breaks and regime changes, the top investors may not adapt quickly enough, resulting in underperformance until the IPQ of the new top investors has adjusted.


The fund volume is very small and theoretically it can be discontinued at any time. However, I don't think so, as the database of the stock market game is too valuable and cannot be easily replicated.

It is more likely that CoIQ.capital GmbH will be bought by a larger player, which will then beat the advertising drum with a marketing budget.

In addition, the fund recently received a Morningstar 5-star rating, which is a quality feature that professional family offices and asset managers in particular pay attention to.

https://global.morningstar.com/de/investments/fonds/0P0001OI4K/kurs


How can the CoIQ Collective Intelligence Fund be sensibly integrated into a portfolio?


As the volatility and concentration are extremely high, the answer can only be an admixture of no more than 10%.


Since you never know how the fund will be positioned, it is neither momentum nor value or quality and should be understood as a multi-factor fund.


I have deliberately kept this brief, all information comes from either:

the website of CoIQ.capital GmbH:

https://www.coiq.capital/

or the associated stock market game:

https://www.informunity.de/

If you are interested, you can find more information there.


That concludes the fund presentation section.

But I would like to say a few words about the stock market game and why you should give it a try.


I've been active since Q3 2023 with https://www.informunity.de/ and I have to say that the experience has been consistently positive.

There is no forum by design; you don't want decision-making processes to be influenced by filter bubble effects or social dynamics.

But at the same time, you have a reality check on how your investment themes have performed, how good you really are compared to others.

What type of investor you are and whether your self-image can keep up with the bare figures.

And all without having to pay expensive tuition fees.


Studies regularly show that around 75% to 90% of investors consider themselves to be above average.

Here you have the opportunity to put it to the test.


The Amazon voucher is a nice goodie, but for stock-savvy people like you, it could bring real added value and make you a better investor in the long term.


Thank you for your attention.

Feel free to write why the fund / stock market game is interesting for you or why not.


😘

14
27 Comentários

imagem de perfil
@DonkeyInvestor Have I promised you too much?
Interested? 😘
2
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost You lost me when you wrote that no British were injured. Were at least any French people injured?
4
imagem de perfil
So the top positions of random people who gambled for years in a restricted investment universe without real money for three fifty Amazon vouchers and were the most successful?
2
imagem de perfil
1
imagem de perfil
@DonkeyInvestor although I wouldn't say "top" positions.
As far as I know, they are all positions. It's just that the successful stocks are also held by the top investors.
So the winning stocks are disproportionately represented.
(which is actually a good thing)
imagem de perfil
@DonkeyInvestor and the limited investment universe must be seen in relative terms.
There are enough sectors and regions represented to be able to capture most trends.

What you won't find is a $PLTR for IPOs or similar.
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost if I'm going to copytrade, then just go straight to @Epi 😃
2
imagem de perfil
@DonkeyInvestor In my case, both have the same position size.
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost but what totally irritates me is the Morningstar rating. How the hell does that come about?
imagem de perfil
The juice sounds great.
The Top Investor Portfolio sounds like something that can go badly wrong because systematic errors creep in.
Overweighting sectors and/or factors, investor styles that are not factors but do well for a decade or two; overperforming over the last decade only to die the most dramatic death in stock market history.

Basically, you try to catch the biggest clunkers with the 10 out of 300 guidelines here, but I'm at least slightly to moderately skeptical.
It's quite an academic approach. The problem I see is that it assumes that the performers of the last period have a higher chance of being successful in the next. A sensible idea, but haven't there already been studies that at least cast doubt on this? I have a vague idea, but I'd have to do some research.
2
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf Yes, I also see that as the biggest problem...
However, it's the same with momentum, regime change = crash

And then the new winners crystallize.
1
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost Yup the question is always whether the premium is +greater than the crash takes a way (all compared to the overall market of course)

But I think nan can also try something. I always think about it too. Recently thought about putting some of the money I have into a REIT etf. For no good reason at all 🙈


I'm afraid in most cases it comes down to what Fama once said; that markets are not efficient, but the average investor would do well to act as if they were.
1
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf I have to agree with Mr. Fama, but the top investors are by definition not average. 😁
1
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost yep, true dat. The problem is that yesterday's top investors are not necessarily tomorrow's investors. Time will tell. (Or if you know someone, maybe a finance student could do a little master's thesis on it to set up a study) 😂
1
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf That's the beauty of it, it's a dynamic system, if the top investors can't adapt to new circumstances, new ones will come along.

It just can't happen too often.

However, under such assumptions, most momentum strategies would also reach their limits.
imagem de perfil
Or too fast. Could it end up being that the thing correlates strongly with market momentum? 😂
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf yes, you can benchmark it against other funds here:

https://www.onvista.de/fonds/COIQ-GLOBAL-EQUITY-EVOLUTIONARY-COLLECTIVE-INTELLIGENCE-R-EUR-ACC-Fonds-DE000A3C91C5

Unfortunately, the fund is only 3 years old, but if you run it against a value, quality, momentum and normal world, it is noticeable that they all perform relatively the same.
But the CoIQ outperforms them all in upward phases.

This is what you also see in the long-term chart: higher highs, higher max drawdown.
1
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost I'm curious to see what happens in the long term. At the moment it reads like a tech bro's wet dream 😁
1
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost have always been proud that I didn't find Tesla in the top 100 of my portfolio 😁
1
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf You haven't had your Momentum ETF that long, have you? 😜
Ver todas as 3 restantes respostas
imagem de perfil
Curiosity! You're torn between the two. Although: this is not what mama has been telling you ☝️
1
imagem de perfil
But congratulations on being in the top 5-10%
1
So the IPQ is only based on the base and the hold portfolio, not on the others.
1
imagem de perfil
@flo I just checked again, you're right.
There are credits for the other portfolios but no IPQ.

I will improve it, thanks.
Participar na conversa