1D·

📊 My portfolio update January 2026

January was a challenging but generally constructive month.

A strong start to the year was followed by a significant tech correction in the middle of the month, triggered by risk-off flows, interest rate sensitivity and caution after the first US earnings.


Despite this volatility, I closed the month clearly in the plus the month:


👉 Monthly performance: +2.5 %


👉 Portfolio value: € 39,576


1st performance & comparison 🚀


January was characterized by sectoral rotation:

Software & high-beta corrected significantly, while selected cyclicals, commodities and special situations remained stable.


Performance in comparison (31.01.2026):

- My securities account:
+2,50 %

- NASDAQ 100: +0.47 %

- S&P 500: +0.30 %

- DAX: -0.33 %

- FTSE All-World: +0.98 %


👉 The outperformance is not the result not from broad tech exposurebut from targeted themes, anti-cyclical positions and active allocation.


2. purchases, sales & allocation 💶


The focus in January was clearly on Risk management and cash management:



Acquisitions: Siemens ($SIE (+0,83%)) (twice) - Partial reinvestment of realized gains. Euro Overnight Rate Swap ETF ($XEON (+0%))- targeted liquidity build-up



Sales: Partial sale Rheinmetall ($RHM (-5,47%))after an extreme run (+735% since entry)


👉 Currently Cash / cash equivalents at ~4 % of the portfolio - deliberately increased in an environment of increasing uncertainty.


3rd top mover in January 🟢


January was clearly dominated by special situations and cyclical themes carried.


The strongest performer was IREN m($IREN (-23,43%)), which rose by +40,8 % benefited massively from the recovery in the mining sector. Another strong performer was the VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF ($NUKL (-6,27%))with +21,7 %driven by structural demand, supply shortages and geopolitical reassessment.


American Lithium placed +19,1 % and showed a technical countermovement after months of weakness. Alibaba ($BABA (-1,78%)) was convincing with +15,9 %supported by valuation levels, margin stabilization and the first signs of regulatory easing.


Also Novo Nordisk ($NOVO B (-8,24%)) (+15,4 %) also benefited from sustained demand in the GLP-1 segment, while Rheinmetall despite a partial sale again +14,1 % and confirmed its role as a structural profiteer.


4th flop mover in January 🔴


The weaker side of the portfolio was clearly in the high-multiple-tech segment segment.


Cloudflare ($NET (-2,39%)) lost -11,2 % in the wake of a massive revaluation of AI and infrastructure software. Ferrari ($RACE (-1,03%)) (-10,9 %) and Snowflake ($SNOW (-6,89%)) (-10,3 %) suffered from profit-taking and higher expectations after strong previous quarters.


Also CrowdStrike ($CRWD (-9,02%)) (-6,6 %) and Datadog ($DDOG (-10,15%)) (-6,4 %) were under pressure, although there was little change in operational quality. Berkshire Hathaway ($BRK.B (+0,28%)) rounded off the list of losers with -6,1 % burdened by interest rate and insurance discussions.


👉 Important: These are primarily valuation and sentiment moves. valuation and sentiment movesnot fundamental breaks.


5. conclusion 💡


January was not an easy month, but a good start to the year:


- Outperformance against all relevant indices


- Profits realized, cash increased


- Volatility consciously accepted instead of blindly smoothed out


The environment remains challenging:


Interest rates, Fed expectations, political uncertainties and earnings will continue to shape the markets in February.

The focus therefore remains clearly on quality, liquidity and selective opportunities.


Question for the community


Which stock surprised you the most in January - positively or negatively?


👇 Write it in the comments!

attachment



attachment



attachment



attachment



attachment



attachment



attachment
18
10 Comentários

imagem de perfil
Looks stable after all
2
imagem de perfil
@Multibagger am satisfied but the Saas titles have literally been torn apart since then 😂
1
Let me ask you a provocative question. You seem to put a lot of time into your portfolio, you posted the performance comparison for January (you beat all indices). But when I look at your portfolio on Parqet, I see that you significantly underperformed the MSCI World in EVERY other period (your portfolio +25% since purchase, MSCI World +45%). A one-off savings plan on the MSCI World would have cost you exactly 30 seconds. Wouldn't that be the best choice for you (and probably 95% of all other users here)? At the moment, investing is simply an incredibly expensive hobby for you.
1
imagem de perfil
@monkey_gambler The MSCI World is the best and simplest solution for many - I go along with that.

My portfolio is deliberately more active, with phases of under- and outperformance. The January comparison was a snapshot, not a claim to permanent superiority. I show the development transparently, including weaknesses.

Passive works excellently - active is a deliberate deviation, not a recommendation for everyone.
1
imagem de perfil
@Derspekulant1 100% approval
1
@Derspekulant1 You have no phases of outperformance, you have systematically underperformed the broad market - the most boring ETF - for 4 years. What is your plan? Burn thousands of euros a year? Do you want to change your strategy? Are you hoping it will get better on its own? You may not have any claim to permanent superiority, but after 5, 10 or 20 years of active investing with thousands of hours of your life invested, it would be "nice" to outperform Aunt Gisela's ETF savings plan.
1
imagem de perfil
@monkey_gambler A quick fact check before we get lost in opinions: You are looking at the IZF, which is visually depressed by my high cash holdings and fresh acquisitions (like Siemens just now).

The comparison via the IZF is a classic beginner's mistake here, as it only reflects my savings behavior and cash timing. The TTWROR, on the other hand, isolates my asset selection from the cash flows and proves in black and white that my stock picking outperforms the MSCI World in the long term.

Since March 2024: +49.6% (vs. MSCI World +30.0%)

Last 12 months: +7.7% (vs. MSCI World +3.8%)

So I'm beating the 'boring ETF' pretty clearly - despite the current tech correction. It is clear that active strategies mean more volatility, but the excess return of almost 20% since the start speaks a different language than 'expensive hobby'. You just have to be able to read the figures correctly 😉
@Derspekulant1 You have to be careful not to talk yourself up a bit. Of course I compared the TTWROR, the iShares MSCI World has made over 40% "since purchase", your portfolio under 9%. Over the last three years, the MSCI World has made 50% and your portfolio 30%. This has nothing to do with "opinion", hard facts.
imagem de perfil
@monkey_gambler You are making the next methodological error by comparing a fully invested product (index) with a portfolio including cash holdings. In phases of rising markets, my cash ratio naturally slows down the TTWROR of the overall portfolio (cash drag). However, if you only look at the performance of the invested assets - i.e. my actual stock picking - the outperformance since March 2024 is almost 20% compared to the MSCI World. If you compare apples with pears, you will get the wrong results.
imagem de perfil
Stock that surprised me in January? $DIS .
Participar na conversa