LoginSignup
immagine del profilo
S.A.U.
@SAUgut777
2Mes·

Welcome...Part 3

...in contrast to the $JEGP (-0,43%) in my opinion, runs much more quietly without a larger CC and, although not monthly, brings in even more on a quarterly basis.

16.09
iShares World Equity High Income ETF logo
iShares World Equity High Income ETF
Acquistato x500 a 4,683 €
2341,50 €
11
17 Commenti
immagine del profilo
Olli@Olli68
2Mes
I have that one too. It's a good one. 👍
•
4
•
Dividentology@Dividentology
2Mes
@Olli68 0.77 TER is really high …
••
immagine del profilo
Olli@Olli68
2Mes
@Dividentology It's activ managed. Therefore higher than passive managed ETFs.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Beleggen M.@fund_whisperer_1682
2Mes
@Dividentology it isnt 0.77 TER it's 0.35 TER always double check GETQUIN numbers.

Really agree it's a high potential ETF (in combination with JGPI)
••
immagine del profilo
felipe estupendo@felipeestupendo
2Mes
Noiseless, because sideways since 1 1/2? And 0.77% costs are not exactly cheap either 👻
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
S.A.U.@SAUgut777
2Mes
@felipeestupendo is recovering, however, and thus offers an even higher return, irrespective of the already higher dividend 🤫
•
4
•
immagine del profilo
SanSebastian@WarrenamBuffet
2Mes
@felipeestupendo this is wrong here at GQ- Are 0.35 ter as with the JPMs....
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Oleg@ScorpionfromBW
2Mes
But you also jump on every bandwagon. Back and forth. But it's your business. Not that you'll push him off again tomorrow 🤣
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
S.A.U.@SAUgut777
2Mes
@ScorpionfromBW Well, back and forth is relative in this case... even if not every horse is a winner, the added value was reinvested profitably and even if I leave the pitch with a draw, the added value remains....

...better actively managed than passively chasing 😉
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
K@TechNav
2Mes
I think in the end you will decide in favor of the $TDIV...
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
NichtRelevant@NichtRelevant
2Mes
I also have the $WINC - in combination with the $TDIV. I don't think the JEGP is wrong either, but I think it's suffering a lot because of the dollar and that will change again in the long term.
•
2
•
immagine del profilo
S.A.U.@SAUgut777
2Mes
@NichtRelevant What I like about $WINC is that it is not based purely on CC.

Unfortunately, $JEGP continues to go downhill even without the dollar, and the payouts can't keep up in the long term...
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead
2Mes
Unfortunately not true. The ETF does indeed use CC (index call options). Futures are also used.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
S.A.U.@SAUgut777
2Mes
@Yield-Ahead...can, but does not have to, be a completely different strategy than a pure CC.
•
1
•
Fred@Fred999
2Mes
How does the ETF pay a 10% dividend without CCs if it contains low dividend companies like NVIDIA or Apple?
••
immagine del profilo
Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead
2Mes
@Fred999 You're absolutely right, what it says at the top of the introductory text is wrong. It uses CC.
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
S.A.U.@SAUgut777
2Mes
@Yield-Ahead but not alone, is not based on it, is recovering, albeit slowly, from April and continues to pay out stably 🤫 ..have edited the introductory sentence again 😉
••
Partecipa alla conversazione
IscrivitiAccesso