6G·

🚀 Momentum strategy 2026: Update & objective 📈

Happy New Year everyone! 🎆 Just in time for the start of the year, I would like to share my portfolio update for the Top 8 share pool with you and give you an outlook for 2026.

First things first: no one knows whether 2026 will be a bull or bear year. Predictions for individual assets are often dubious. That's why I'm sticking to my rule-based model and present you with the current top 10.


🔝 My top 8 for the preselection 1st half of 2026:

Rank Share Sector Momentum Score


1 Western Digital ($WDC (-8,42%) IT / Storage solutions 115,2 %

2 Warner Bros. Discovery ($WBD (+0,33%) ) Communication / Media 103,8 %

3 Micron Technology ($MU (-1,09%) ) IT / Semiconductor 103,2 %

4 Seagate Tech ($STX (-6,52%) IT / storage solutions 83,0 %

5 Albemarle ($ALB (+2,71%) Chemicals / Lithium 74,7 %

6 Teradyne ($TER (-2,24%) IT / semiconductor test 67,3 %

7 Newmont ($NEM (-1,06%) ) Commodities / Gold 66,4 %

8 AppLovin ($APP (+2,83%) Software / AdTech 64,4 %


(Closely followed by $HOOD (-3,79%)
and $LRCX (-1,9%)
in 9th & 10th place).


🔍 A few insights into the model:

The sector weighting is exciting this time. We see a strong cluster risk (but also momentum!) in the area of Memory technology and semiconductors.

Interesting: Almost all of the stocks did not perform until the 2nd half of 2025 generated. As my filter weights the most recent past more heavily than the older past, these stocks were flushed to the top. This could be a signal that the trend here is continuing to gather pace.


And which two stocks are we starting 2026 with?

They are still $MU (-1,09%) and $WDC (-8,42%) as these are the two leaders in the ranking within the share pool, in 3rd and 4th place by a relatively large margin.

This means that no action is required for the time being and the next check will not take place until the end of January.


🎯 My goal for 2026: The €50,000 mark

I'm starting with capital of 31.000 €. For motivation, I have created my projections based on various return scenarios:


My personal goal for the end of 2026 is a portfolio value of approx. 50.000 €. This requires a performance of around 60 %. Sporty? Yes. Impossible with momentum? No.


What is your assessment?

Especially with the memory values ($WDC (-8,42%) , $MU (-1,09%) , $STX (-6,52%) are often a divisive issue. Do you still see the sector as the leader in 2026 or will it soon run out of steam? 💬


I wish you all a successful year on the stock market and, above all, good health! 🍀

36
66 Commenti

immagine del profilo
Superbly written! I still think your model is a candidate for the gold standard for single stock momentum.
Perhaps I will use it for part of my trading portfolio? It's exciting and promising in any case!
5
immagine del profilo
@Epi hahaha... wait until the wikifolio is there ;-)
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82... I'm waiting...

Your single stock Momentum Wikifolio would complete the Momentum Wikifolio series.

All that's needed is a crypto momentum model. But somehow nobody has dared to do that yet 😉.
2
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Are you planning to create a wikifolio?
2
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 If you manage at least 50% on a permanent basis, I'll also invest a portion in your next project 😉😎
3
immagine del profilo
@Epi That would probably be a very sophisticated momentum model, for good reason nobody has dared to try it yet 😅 Let's see who will develop ambitions there
1
immagine del profilo
@AxoWallStreet yes, is already in the implementation phase
1
immagine del profilo
@Multibagger I'll definitely give it my all
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Do you already have a link to the wikifolio so that people can bookmark it?
1
immagine del profilo
@AxoWallStreet it is still in the release phase, therefore not yet divisible
3
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Yes, crypto somehow has different laws and volatilities. You have to approach it differently than traditional markets. I don't.
Visualizza tutti 6 ulteriori risposte
immagine del profilo
This looks very interesting to me, so I will also be following along with a portion of my portfolio.

I’ve been in momentum strategies for a while now but have yet to land on one that gels with me, but I’m loving the thought that you’ve put in to this.

Also shout out to @Multibagger for the recent post encouraging more community engagement, I’ve lurked for a while and this is my first time posting.
3
immagine del profilo
@garethhughes Thank you very much and welcome to the active community.
immagine del profilo
Congratulations! 🍾 You seem to have arrived with your strategy. Now it's time to buckle up and persevere. Good luck!
2
immagine del profilo
@randomdude Thank you... It's true, perseverance is always what counts in the end and easier said than done. As long as I don't see a better opportunity for me anywhere, this will be my path.
immagine del profilo
Very interesting strategy, which I can understand well through the updates. I will be there in 2026 with part of the portfolio. 👍
1
immagine del profilo
@Olli68 Good luck and welcome to the Momentum Army 😅 how exactly do you want to implement this?
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Good question. I will save the strategy and act in the same way as you when stocks are wrong. A wikifolio from you would of course simplify this 😉
At the same time, I have decided to continue saving in the 3xGTAA wikifolio. Both strategies together should make up around 30% of my portfolio in 2-3 years.
Let's see...
immagine del profilo
@Olli68 So, do you map and track yourself or "simply" trade according to what I post here?
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Unfortunately, I'm anything but a strategist by nature. So: simple re-trading 😉
1
immagine del profilo
Great selection. The question with $WBD is how much is still possible. Whether paramount has already withdrawn or whether there is still a bidding war. In the semiconductor sector, I also see some momentum in $4062 and $HY9H. Could perhaps be interesting for country diversification.
immagine del profilo
@Tenbagger2024 You may be right, but I still have to include it. In the event of a takeover, I would have to add another candidate anyway. SK Hynix would actually also be a candidate, but as I have decided to focus only on the USA for the time being, I have to take it out

I would have to test the country diversification again first
1
immagine del profilo
Which parameters do you use for selection? The same as GTAA?
immagine del profilo
@Neyney I don't have the exact parameters of GTAA on my screen right now, as I don't use it myself. But if they are not the same, they are very similar as far as I can remember
immagine del profilo
Hi, why are you starting in January with $WDC and $MU? According to your list above, $WBD is in 2nd place
immagine del profilo
@Bein-Godik A legitimate question, perhaps I did not formulate it so clearly and unambiguously in my initial post. The top 8 selection mentioned above is only the first stage of the momentum model. Within the top 8 stock pool, a further measurement is made, but with 4 different time periods (from short to long) and the average score is calculated from this. In this case, Warner Bros currently has a lower score than the other two stocks MU and WDC
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Thank you. Will you publish the Top8 monthly in the future?
immagine del profilo
@Bein-Godik the top 8 for the share pool is only determined twice in Lahr. Therefore, there is only an announcement/update at the beginning of the year and in the second half of the year. However, the top 2 from this top 8 pool are of course published every month
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Thanks to you. I started today with 2 small positions
1
immagine del profilo
@Bein-Godik good luck and don't get nervous right away. I've been invested in both since the end of October, so the momentum could soon flatten out and we could move on to the next candidates
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 On the first day already +6%😂. I'm thrilled👍
1
immagine del profilo
@Bein-Godik hahahaha... don't get used to it 😅
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Things are really picking up again today. Thanks for sharing your information👍
1
immagine del profilo
1
immagine del profilo
When do you plan a realocation only after H2, or monthly lookback?
immagine del profilo
@Aktienfox The share pool is always checked/updated after 6 months and reallocated to the top 2 within the share pool every month if necessary
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 will you also weight news/market situation with a factor of e.g. 1/10? + what do you do in sideways phases so as not to underperform, because you have a six-month varnish? If, for example, after your new allocation for defense momentum is built up ... what speaks against a three-month allocation, I would prefer
immagine del profilo
@Aktienfox News leaves me cold and has to be ignored. Trading is simply based on the data. Of course, you can be unlucky if the trend reverses or a new one emerges just after the reallocation. This must then be accepted and should be corrected after another 6 months. If you look at the backtest, you will find some years with bear markets / sideways markets, but the performance is still acceptable. Basically, the model is also designed more for outperformance in bull markets. I have tested almost everything to see which lookback periods deliver the best results overall. With 3M Lookback you have traded back and forth too much and get false signals. We don't want to have the "mayflies" in our portfolio but the winners with medium and long-term momentum
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 thanks for your answer, I'll do some baking tests and maybe write a post in the future :)
1
immagine del profilo
@Aktienfox I would be delighted if others also decide to test and tinker. Good luck and look forward to your contribution
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 Can't every 6 months be too long? It would be for me. I briefly toyed with the idea of implementing your strategy with derivatives. But 6 months is simply too long for that. You would have to take a very long distance from the strike price to get a lucrative leverage with OS and, due to the long time and the expected fluctuations, a long distance for a turbo, which then only offers a small leverage.
immagine del profilo
@Multibagger I have tested quarterly, semi-annually and annually. Semi-annually and annually work best for me with the chosen parameters and momentum lookback periods. This is definitely too much for your approach
1
immagine del profilo
Many thanks for the insight! I am in the process of testing my own model, and $MU is currently also ranked number 1 in an international stock pool. One question: Where do you get the historical data for the long backtests?
immagine del profilo
@Redfox77 For the majority of the backtest, I simply took the top 10 of the previous year's S&P 500 and tested how these 10 performed in the following year, only at the very end did I take the raw data / all prices of the S&P 500 stocks for period x to test which parameters are best suited for the preselection / determination of the stock pool.
1
immagine del profilo
@Krush82 But how do you get the prices of all stocks in the S&P 500 for any point in time x? I can't find any free data.
immagine del profilo
@Redfox77 I also searched for a long time. Thanks to chat gpt, I ended up on github.com and stooq.com and was able to find data from 2010 - 2024 for all S&P 500 stocks. That was enough for me to be able to make further fine adjustments
1
immagine del profilo
I have another question, why did you decide on a fixed preselection? Wouldn't it be better to increase your pool or adapt it flexibly so as not to miss out on opportunities? I also wanted to ask whether you have also actively backtested with eight positions, as I initially noticed a significantly lower risk with eight positions, but also a lower sharp ratio as a result. My problem with my approach so far is not enough backtesting, + high trading costs with 8-20 stocks.
immagine del profilo
@Aktienfox Not having a preselection or a flexible, larger pool is rather counterproductive. Especially if you only ever invest in the Too 2. There are too many false signals and the turnover is too high, which ultimately affects the return. I have backtest with only top 1 holdings up to max top 10 holdings. The diversification reduces both the Max DD but even more the performance. The longer the backtest period, the more noticeable this is in the final result
1
immagine del profilo
Interesting input! But you really have to take a very differentiated view of the performance figures. I once ran a similar model with 0.5% transaction costs: The model was based on the top 100 global stocks as of January 1, 2000 - which of course means a massive look-ahead bias for the period before that, since you already know the future 'winners' in advance and exclude companies that failed during that period.

The drop in CAGR from almost 39% (before 2000) to just 14% in the modern market environment (with a simultaneous 75% drawdown) is already a warning signal. The problem with many backtests is the look-ahead or survivorship bias - today's winners are unconsciously projected into the past.

A quick question about the methodology: Was it ensured that the investment universe at any given time only contained the stocks that were actually tradable at that time (point-in-time)? This would be crucial for a valid classification of the results.
Visualizza tutti 9 ulteriori risposte
Il commento è stato cancellato
Mostra la risposta
Partecipa alla conversazione