immagine del profilo
I claim that it is copied 1:1 from another site and possibly made a little prettier by linking the chart.

For me, the article loses a certain seriousness if the sources are not named...
1
immagine del profilo
@InvestRookie A certain fox (or fuxx?) can tell you a thing or two about that. But he prefers to block everything and everyone who criticizes the lack of sources.
1
immagine del profilo
@DividendenWaschbaer that's how michael official does it too. he blocked me because i was always a bit critical of his clumsy posts and pointed out missing sources
1
immagine del profilo
@Alpalaka @DividendenWaschbaer
How can you do that? You can't sell a course and subscription model like that and generate no reach etc... I don't know how it works with the finfluencers. Unfortunately, there are too many black sheep in this area who then emigrate to Dubai or something ... but hey only m.E 😅

You always have to be careful what you say. You'll end up with a cease-and-desist letter in your letterbox
1
immagine del profilo
@InvestRookie but you also have the opportunity to search for this news feed yourself at any time. So you have it collected.

The sources are simply an economic stock ticker with a news feed.

It's not one person copying from another, but rather similar sources.

But if that's negative for you, then that's okay with me. As I said, you can find it all yourself.

But it doesn't cost anything.
immagine del profilo
@MitVerstandzumKapital
It was not my intention to attack you or your "work" in any way. That is why you were not directly mentioned by name. The stock ticker and news feed is still somewhere on a website that anyone can access, so why not add the footnote "Source: URL" so that everyone has the free choice to visit this site and not have to follow you or someone else in the hope of getting this news feed. Except the news feed and stock ticker are hidden behind a paywall ...

m.E even if you add the source, you will get a follow because humans are lazy by nature and don't click the link 😉
From an editorial point of view, however, it makes the post more credible.