I know you think it sucks

NichtRelevant · 2025-11-07T09:16:00.979695Z

$JEGP There is not rice, but dividends. https://youtu.be/AainIbNwIcY?si=KI6XV2xQLwp_3m5I

2D

I don't have the JEGP, but - among other things - the JEPQ, but the comments that portray investors with a dividend strategy as stupid, clueless idiots are "shit" at best!

•

15

•

Johnny B.@JBatelli

2D

@Reminder I also think the dividend strategy is good. Nevertheless, you can still write that the $JEGP has performed well behind the $TDIV with 27.8% or the $WINC with 21.3% over the last 20 months at 6.8%. Or you can write in a provocative style that it "sucks" because there are better things for many investors here.

•

3

•

Paddy@Mechanikx

2D

I used to have it too, but unfortunately the price losses bear no relation to the dividend.

•

5

•

louisj10@louisj10

2D

@Mechanikx don't see the companies in the Etf as being all that bad.

••

Metis@Metis

2D

@Mechanikx That's why I recently got rid of it and sold it.

•

2

•

Paddy@Mechanikx

2D

Better less dividend and more price gains with normal world etf's.

•

2

•

Max@Divident_e

2D

It sucks

•

4

•

Jimmy@monkey_gambler

2D

Trick 17, invest directly in the reference ETF and pay yourself your desired dividend. Gives more return.

•

3

•

Thomas@Thomas_1963

2D

With a dividend payout of 8.3% and a loss of 10.7% in one year, it's not exactly a winner.
I am also pursuing a dividend strategy, but I would also like to leave something to my children.

•

2

•

NichtRelevant@NichtRelevant

2D

@Thomas_1963 hm. If I go back 2 years I have a price minus of about 3% and then plus the distributions. 😁

I know that most people are allergic to the paper. That's why I posted it. Just to annoy you. 😉😅

•

1

•

Ichbinak63@Ichbinak63

2D

I'm also in with 200, it's not that bad in my opinion.

•

1

•

Yoshika 🦋.@Yoshika

2D

It's not rice and it's not a dividend.
These are option premiums received or price opportunities sold, which are paid out again as dividends.

•

1

•

Yoshika 🦋.@Yoshika

2D

@Yoshika
Covered call ETFs do provide cash flow, but only by cutting growth. This makes them the most inefficient tool for the same purpose compared to value ETFs or bonds. No matter which strategy you follow.

••

Yoshika 🦋.@Yoshika

2D

@Yoshika
Strategically completely inefficient, because the risk remains full equity risk, you take every drawdown in full, but the recovery is cut off because the upside is sold via the calls.
And the cash flow from the option premiums hardly cushions this.
So you cut off growth about 80% of the time, only to get some payout via premium about 20% of the time. From an economic point of view, this is a brake on returns with equity risk.

Then you might as well go for value ETFs or bonds. Predictable cash flow, less risk, often better net return.

•

1

•

Revenant@Revenant3

2D

I do a 50/50 combi with $WINC

•

1

•

NichtRelevant@NichtRelevant

2D

@Revenant3 I have that one as well - together with $TDIV

•

1

•

CrashBurner@Psychedelic_Sunflower

2D

Even if dividend strategies are less suitable for wealth accumulation, this vehicle is completely unsuitable. What is the point of dividends if the share price is completely lagging behind?

••

❤️DIST-LOVE@DISTLOVE

2D

I am somewhat disappointed with the share price performance to date. I would rather forego a 1-2% payout if it meant stronger share price growth. Perhaps JPM will make some adjustments here.

••

Alex@nitroxx

2D

I'm not really happy yet, but I'll complete my year of holding and then decide

••

I know you think it sucks...