1WkĀ·

Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF - debate on position.

Hi all, I'm keen to understand your thoughts on the following. When would you consider $FGEQ (-0.05%) instead of $VWRL (+0.1%) as the core of a portfolio? What would be the benefit of one above the other? I used to have $VWRL (+0.1%) as core, but have switched over to $FGEQ (-0.05%) with $TDIV (-0.61%) on the side and a little of $IAPD (-0.35%) .


I know they track different indexes, as $FGEQ (-0.05%) track high quality companies from developed markets, while $VWRL (+0.1%) tracks stocks from both developed and emerging countries.

$FGEQ (-0.05%) while lacking emerging countries, still has decent growth.


Would you consider $FGEQ (-0.05%) vs $GGRP (+0.27%) or go for a more quality oriented ETF such as $IS3R (+0.56%) to try to grab a little more return?


I'm reconsidering my positions and wondering if I should move some of them around and/or back to where they came from. I've done some DYOR, which has for now lead me to the conclusion to keep $FGEQ (-0.05%) as the main position and expand a bit into $IS3R (+0.56%) on the side.


Wondering what your thoughts are :)

7
3 Comments

profile image
Iā€˜m having both. Even added further ETF to get a monthly dividend and still get nice growth
ā€¢
2
ā€¢
profile image
ā€¢
1
ā€¢
profile image
Thanks for the advice. In my 2025 plan i've decided to continue to expand the $FGEQ position and use $IS3R for exposure to momentum with a higher return. $TDIV remains te dividend ETF and $VHYL had been sold and absorbed into it. For now $GGRP remains but likely will move that into the $FGEQ position as well. Let's see how that goes.
ā€¢ā€¢
Join the conversation