Misan (@Misantrophe) on getquin

8Mon·

TER costs of the $FTWG (+0.99%) are 0.05% lower, however. Would it be an alternative for you, even if it is relatively new and (still) has a lower fund volume?

6 Comments

Kevin E.@KevinE

8Mon

I wouldn't switch because I already have profits on my ETF and these would have to be taxed. However, there is nothing wrong with setting up a new savings plan.

•

Vince von Financial Independence@Financial_Independence

7Mon

Sure, it pays off in the long term. I would simply stop the one ETF savings plan and leave it and go into the cheaper product. Invesco FTSE All World is a good product.

•

View all 2 further answers

Vince von Financial Independence@Financial_Independence

6Mon

Would simply stop one savings plan and then save in the FTWG

••

ETFKing@ETFKing

4Mon

My tip:
Don't just pay attention to the TER. Factors such as e.g. tracking error could become a yield erosion factor that quickly offset the TER difference. In the case of the Invesco ETFs, due to their short existence and the still manageable volume, I think it is still too early to form a final opinion.

••