•
66
•
@randomdude If it were due to the weak dollar, $GGRP would have performed better than $FGEQ, because $GGRP has less USA.
ne I think the answer to why the $GGRP didn't do as well as the $FGEQ is MUCH easier to explain.
The largest position in $FGEQ is $NVDA...
And now guess which company is not included in $GGRP? 😅
ne I think the answer to why the $GGRP didn't do as well as the $FGEQ is MUCH easier to explain.
The largest position in $FGEQ is $NVDA...
And now guess which company is not included in $GGRP? 😅
•
33
•@TotallyLost You're probably right. This makes it all the clearer that the short and medium-term performance of such ETFs is dependent on coincidences that say nothing about the quality of the concepts.
•
11
•@randomdude by the way, have a look at the Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF $BUYB.
It's a very similar principle, but instead of taking companies that increase their dividends, you take companies that buy back their own shares.
I find this really exciting, especially in combination with a quality dividend ETF. 😘
It's a very similar principle, but instead of taking companies that increase their dividends, you take companies that buy back their own shares.
I find this really exciting, especially in combination with a quality dividend ETF. 😘
•
11
•