6D·

Mercedes-Benz Ahead of Its Quarterly Results – Is the Premium Strategy Still the Right Path?

On July 28, $MBG (+2,65%) its quarterly earnings. According to the current analyst consensus on Investing.com, the following are expected:


EPS:
1.33 EUR

Revenue:
32.13 billion EUR


$MBG (+2,65%) continues to operate in a challenging market environment. Demand in China remains subdued, competition—particularly in the electric vehicle segment—is intense, and at the same time, tariffs and geopolitical uncertainties are weighing on the industry. This makes it all the more important to see whether $MBG (+2,65%) it can maintain its profitability at an attractive level despite these challenges. I am therefore particularly interested in the development of the adjusted EBIT margin in the passenger car business, the free cash flow of the industrial business, vehicle deliveries, and the product mix. For a premium manufacturer in particular, it is crucial whether high-end models and high-margin trim levels can partially offset the pressure on earnings.


I will also be closely monitoring how demand in China develops and what statements management makes regarding the future of electric mobility. I’ll be particularly interested to see whether management observes early signs of stabilization in the Chinese premium segment or whether ongoing price pressure continues to weigh on margins.


In addition, I’m interested in whether the initial effects of the ongoing product offensive—particularly with regard to the new models—are already becoming apparent.


Another key focus for me will be capital allocation. $MBG (+2,65%) has been one of the most shareholder-friendly companies in the European automotive sector for years. In addition to an attractive dividend, extensive share buybacks have also played an important role in the past. Following the resumption of the buyback program last year, the market is likely to pay particular attention to whether management continues to adhere to its shareholder-friendly capital policy despite the more challenging environment, or shifts its focus more toward balance sheet strength and investments. Especially in a cyclical business, I believe it is important that capital returns do not come at the expense of financial flexibility.


Analysts, too, remain predominantly cautiously optimistic. According to Investing.com, 11 analysts currently recommend buying the stock, 10 rate it as “Hold,” and 2 issue a “Sell” recommendation. The average price target is around 53.80 EUR.


However, what is likely to be decisive for the market is not so much a slight beat in revenue or EPS, but rather whether $MBG (+2,65%) it can confirm its full-year forecast. Especially following several profit warnings within the automotive industry, the market is likely to react particularly sensitively to any adjustments to the outlook.


My key metrics to watch for the quarterly results

• Adjusted EBIT margin in the passenger car business

• Free cash flow from the industrial business

• Vehicle deliveries and product mix

• Performance of top-end models and the premium strategy

• Performance in China and Europe

• Statements on electromobility and new model generations

• Full-year forecast and capital allocation


My Expectations: I expect a generally rather difficult quarter in a market environment that remains challenging. The key factor for me will be whether $MBG (+2,65%) the company can maintain its high profitability despite the difficult conditions. In the long term, I’m particularly interested in whether the strategy of placing a stronger focus on high-margin premium vehicles continues to pay off and is reflected in free cash flow and returns. $MBG (+2,65%) is already part of my portfolio. At the same time, I’ve been keeping a close eye on the stock for quite some time. This is less due to the quality of the company and more to the structural challenges facing the automotive industry—from increasing competition to the shift toward electric mobility and developments in China. The upcoming quarterly results will serve as an important indicator for me as to whether the long-term investment story continues to hold up or whether other companies currently offer a more attractive risk-reward ratio. After the results are released, I will therefore reassess whether $MBG (+2,65%) it still deserves a place in my portfolio.


~ Not investment advice ~

14
17 Comentários

The "Premium" strategy was actually scrapped a while ago
8
imagem de perfil
@Musikerie Exactly... That's what I was just about to write
1
imagem de perfil
@Musikerie That’s an interesting point. However, I wouldn’t say the premium strategy has been completely abandoned. In my view, $MBG has adjusted it rather than abandoned it in recent quarters.

As I see it, the focus remains more on high-margin vehicles and greater profitability rather than on maximizing unit sales. At the same time, however, management has also recognized that in a weaker market environment (especially in China), it needs to act more pragmatically than originally planned.
@DividendenPapa Källenius is a sly one—he couldn’t publicly admit that his strategy was wrong. Mercedes is and remains a high-end brand by definition, but whatever he actually had in mind is now a thing of the past. Right now, Mercedes is focusing mainly on its workforce again anyway. The late shift already had to work two extra hours this week, and anyone who didn’t take the severance package is now under pressure. Let’s see how much longer Källenius can hold on.
1
imagem de perfil
@Musikerie I agree with you there. The group’s original direction has certainly failed. The shifts in direction—from a consistent premium strategy to the very strong focus on full electrification that we’ve seen in the meantime—haven’t necessarily helped the brand, in my view. I’m curious to see whether $MBG will pursue a clearer and more consistent long-term strategy in the future.
@DividendenPapa Are you AI-powered? I don't mean to offend, but you really sound like it.
imagem de perfil
@Musikerie Sometimes. Sometimes yes, sometimes no—it depends on how much time I have at the moment. But I mainly use it just for drafting.
imagem de perfil
$MBG It has always been a cyclical market. And every time the market hits a low, Mercedes is written off (and every time it hits a high, it’s praised to the skies). The brave are rewarded.

“The most dangerous words in investing: ‘This time it’s different.’” John Templeton
1
imagem de perfil
@MrKurt89 I basically agree with you there. The cyclical nature of the stock was also a deliberate part of my original investment thesis, so it comes as no surprise to me. $MBG has already been written off several times, and cyclical stocks often become attractive when sentiment is particularly low.

However, I believe that in addition to the classic cyclical nature, we’re also seeing structural changes today. Competition (especially from new manufacturers in the Far East) has increased significantly, and consumer behavior has also changed. This won’t catch $MBG off guard, but in my view, it will bring about lasting changes to the market environment. That’s exactly why I’m currently monitoring developments particularly closely.
imagem de perfil
DividendPapa with his 4th identical AI post in 24 hours—Will he keep using dashes?
1
imagem de perfil
@CMustermann Yes, I make a conscious effort to use the same structured format for every company. This helps me evaluate quarterly results and investment theses based on the same criteria and compare companies more effectively.

And yes, I use AI to help me draft the content. However, the content, key points, and my assessment are all my own. If you have specific suggestions for improvement, I’d love to hear them. I’m always open to constructive criticism. 🙂
1
imagem de perfil
I'm not expecting any pleasant surprises either. If the price rises to my entry price, I'll sell.
1
imagem de perfil
@TradingHase I can generally understand that. Where would you invest the freed-up capital instead? Would you turn your back on the automotive industry entirely, or would you instead bet on a competitor within the industry? I find this comparison particularly interesting.
1
imagem de perfil
@DividendenPapa I'm invested in MB, BYD, and Xpeng. I wouldn't add any other automaker. Margins are getting smaller and smaller, and market pressure is increasing. Even though there is repeated talk of a market shakeout among Chinese manufacturers, this will take even longer, and the players that remain in the market will not ease the price pressure.
The two Chinese manufacturers mentioned above, together with the Geely Group, will capture larger market shares.
Given this new landscape in the automotive sector, further investment in the industry is no longer an option.
1
imagem de perfil
@TradingHase I completely understand your thoughts on this. I wouldn't make any further investments in the automotive industry right now either. Personally, I only have $MBG in my portfolio.
1
imagem de perfil
When I think about Mercedes at night, I can't sleep.

I like the brand and even own a 26-year-old model with over 300,000 kilometers on the odometer. But unfortunately, management has (almost) always managed to run the company into the ground and bury all its potential. Always the big ideas: an integrated technology conglomerate including aircraft manufacturing and Fokker/Dornier. The acquisition of Chrysler and the purchase of Mitsubishi. Smart. The acquisition and then sale of Tesla shares. The luxury strategy. A string of disasters and failures.

The best part is that they often just needed to ride out these strategies they’d already started. But no—every new board of directors took a sledgehammer to their predecessor’s legacy. Experts—in pinstripes.
1
imagem de perfil
@NichtRelevant I forgot to mention the terrible electric car designs. 😅
Participar na conversa