I have 2 comments on this. In which area of your satellite strategy do you see the 2 largest positions $RHM and $BRK.B? And why do you see $1211 as an anti-cyclical position? Personally, the software sector would be too big for me, but that's a matter of taste and probably also due to the fact that you couldn't really decide between all the great companies? Otherwise, I think it is well diversified, as many stocks that are missing at first glance are represented in the core ETF.
•
22
•
@Multibagger $BRK.B and $RHM I bought both for quality reasons and as defensive stocks as a countervalue to my saas stocks, precisely because they are many but are either among the top 2 or market leaders in their respective fields and do not overlap. My US share is also below 50% in the entire portfolio. $1211 was not meant to be entirely anti-cyclical but rather $BABA and in the case of $1211 of course a bet on the strength in its market, which is slowly becoming apparent over time. Thanks for the feedback!
•
11
•@Derspekulant1 Of course, the under 50% US share will be tight if the two core ETFs have a 60% US share and you continue to save them consistently 😉 But I don't think that's a bad thing
•
11
•@Multibagger according to parqet x-Ray I am exactly at 50.24%
•
11
•@Derspekulant1 I know, I've done the math without the very small positions. That's why I wrote that it will be difficult if you continue to save in the core ETFs because they have a 60% US share.
•
11
•