2Semana
The problem I see here is that the index methodology is not entirely clear to me. I also like to weight factors myself.
Pro for me.
The costs of multifactor ETFs are relative from my point of view, as world factor ETFs and even more so EM factor ETFs are not cheap. . They are advantageous from a tax perspective, as I don't have to carry out any tax-damaging rebalancing.
Conclusion for me:
Definitely interesting for someone who believes in multifactor, is lazy and has no incentive to micromanage their portfolio.
Pro for me.
The costs of multifactor ETFs are relative from my point of view, as world factor ETFs and even more so EM factor ETFs are not cheap. . They are advantageous from a tax perspective, as I don't have to carry out any tax-damaging rebalancing.
Conclusion for me:
Definitely interesting for someone who believes in multifactor, is lazy and has no incentive to micromanage their portfolio.
•
22
•
2Semana
@SchlaubiSchlumpf agree with you, the methodology here - in contrast to the other factors - was also somewhat vague. This is probably because a lot of things are "mixed up". In terms of feeling, I also tend to favor the "purer" factors such as value, momentum, volatility or size.
•
22
•