1Anno·

ETF yield booster

At the age of 25, I'm asking myself whether it makes sense to add to my $VWCE (-1,13%) the $CSNDX (-1,83%) or the $QUS5 (-0,75%) in order to emphasize the tech stocks a little more and achieve a slightly higher return. Does that make sense? If so, which of the two would you prefer?

6 Commenti

Daniel@danielsofficial

1Anno

As always, it depends. Tech has done brutally well over the last few years and assuming it continues that way due to the whole AI thing, then you're not doing much wrong with the $CSNDX. In addition to your two suggestions, I have one more. Maybe the $IS3R is also something for you, as it contains the stocks that are currently doing well.

•

Kai@Dividenden-Sammler

1Anno

If you want to give the tech industry a higher weighting than it already has in the broadly diversified ETFs, such as the MSCI World or FTSE Allworld, I would go for a NASDAQ ETF. However, I would stay away from industry or sector ETFs because I want to invest for the long term. In my opinion, these are the products that are currently in fashion in terms of investment focus - whether this will remain the case in the long term is questionable. They are more good for short-term trading, if at all.
However, the combination of MSCI World or FTSE Allworld together with a Nasdaq100 is a good combination if you want to overweight tech stocks in your portfolio.

•

Epi@Epi

1Anno

"Earn more returns with tech stocks" - that's what 25-year-olds thought in 2000. By the time they were 40, the total return was 0%.

So be careful, tech can also be different.

•

Olli@Olli68

1Anno

Better use the $EQEU instead.

•

U1F34E@U1F34E

1Anno

The $AVWS would complement your $VWCE well. The All-World does not cover small caps and with the $AVWS you would invest specifically in undervalued profitable small caps. According to Capm and fama & french, this gives you statistically higher return opportunities with a long-term investment horizon.

•

U1F34E@U1F34E

1Anno

@U1F34E Here is another interesting video on the subject of overweighting individual sectors https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3B9umhfv_ww&pp=ygUKQmVuIGZlbGl4IA%3D%3D

•