Serious question: why choose this etf with almost 0.4% TER when there are some with half or even less which are even more diversified with more than 500 stocks?

E.g. vanguard or invesco with 0.15% TER and the relatively same allocation % but with more stocks.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@__FunFun__ I can honestly tell you that I don't care about the 0.xx%, if I like the etf and it generally outperforms the market, then I'm happy to pay a few euros more.

I also have 2 Letfs that have brought me by far the highest returns for 6 years with 0.5% and 0.6% TER. Should I therefore forego the almost 54% return this year?
You don't have to optimize every cent but rather follow your strategy :)
•
3
•
@Negroni can't understand this 100% with this etf which has the relatively same allocation as vanguard world etf (you can also see that they have almost the same return over 1 year)

With a thematic ETF such as "health" "utilities" etc I could understand it but this is actually 1 to 1 the same as vanguard with a few changes and twice the TER - i.e. the return/track difference will be relatively the same for both, especially over several years and then the TER is the only point that reduces the profit.
••
immagine del profilo
@__FunFun__ I haven't compared the two, but maybe the payout is simply higher than with vanguard?
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@Mcl1991 the discussion is nonsense because the vanguard all world and the quality growth are completely different products.
•
10
•
immagine del profilo
@__FunFun__ Are apples = pears for you? Vanguard All World and WisdomTree pursue different investment approaches and are therefore not really comparable.
••