1Année·

💨 Share presentation 💨

Northland Power Inc.
$NPI (-4,39 %)

CA6665111002


Or also..."Gone with the wind" 💨🥸


Description of the company:


Northland Power Inc. is a Canadian electric utility headquartered in Toronto. Northland operates power plants in Europe and Canada, with a focus on natural gas and renewable energy. [1]


Business segments [4]:

Offshore Wind

Onshore Renewables

Utilities

Natural Gas

New Technologies


Sales (in thousands of CAD) [7]:

Offshore Wind (DE / NED): 1,259,247

Onshore Renewable Facilities (CA / ESP): 485,857

Natural Gas (CA): 425,572

Utilities (COL): 269,692

Other: 8,447


More than 70% of revenue is attributable to the Offshore/Onshore Wind division, i.e. the operation of wind turbines on water, and Onshore Renewables, which includes solar installations and wind energy generation on land.


The attached chart shows the existing onshore and offshore wind farms and solar plants.


In future, the company would also like to invest in South Korea, Japan, Scotland and Taiwan and finance offshore wind and solar projects. Some of these are already in the early/mid-stage.


About us according to the homepage:


"Northland Power is a power producer dedicated to developing, building, owning and operating clean and green global power infrastructure assets in Asia, Europe, Latin America and North America. Our facilities produce electricity from clean-burning natural gas and renewable resources such as wind, and solar. We have a long track record of 35 years in business." [2]


Strategy according to company homepage:


"Northland aims to continually increase shareholder value by creating high-quality projects underpinned by revenue contracts that deliver predictable cash flows. We strive for excellence in managing our projects and operating facilities, always seeking opportunities to enhance performance and value. We focus on sustainability with the goal of improving the impact of resource usage in our environment." [3]

"We actively seek to invest in technologies and jurisdictions where we can apply an early mover advantage and establish a meaningful presence. We inspire our people to achieve excellence in everything, embracing and living Northland's values on a daily basis." [3]


We will certainly find out in this analysis whether Northland is also putting its strategy into action. So what do we want to see from the facts and figures?


A. Secure and predictable cash flows.

B. Shareholder value.

C. Good/sensible strategic alignment.

D. Sustainability in the projects.



Key figures Northland Power [6]*:


-P/E 2022: 10.7

-P/E 2023e: 24.6

-P/E 2024e: 18.6

-P/E 2025e: 25.4

-PEG 2023e (P/E ratio/growth rate*): = 6.15 (rule of thumb: < 1 = very favorable)

-PEG 2024e: = 4.65

-Price to book 2023e: 2.25

-Price to book 2024e: 2.13

-FCF margin 2023e: 15.6%

-FCF margin 2024e: 16.1%

-Enterprise value to FCF 2023e: 34.5

-Sales growth: 2023e: -10.2%; 2024e: 4.7%; 2025e: -1.4%

-EBIT growth: 2023e: -20.6%; 2024e: 4.3%; 2025e: -1.7%

-Dividend yield 2022: 4.97% (payout ratio of the last 3 years at 83%)



Country key figures for Australia, NZ and Canada [9]:


-Total P/E ratio (excluding banking sector/financials): 11.64

-Growth (without banking sector/financials): 11.99%


-P/E Power (power generation): 18.72

-PEG Power (power generation): 1.18 (growth next 5 years 9.6%)


-Inflation Canada (forecast for 2023): 3.9% [10]

-Prime rate: 5% [11]

-Government debt: 66.4% of GDP [12]


-->Growth rate Northland*:

Based on Northland Power's general and sector-specific data and sales and EBIT forecasts, I assume average growth of 4% p.a. Northland is growing slower than the market! 4% is even too high from a short-term perspective.


Side note: Based on the valuation ratios, we could have an attractively valued market (Australia, NZ and Canada)!


Given the growth prospects, I don't see Northland as cheaply valued. I would rather put it in the "moderately valued" range.



Traderfox Scores [16]:


Quality Check: 13 out of 15 points

Dividend Check: 9 out of 15 points

Growth Check: 5 out of 15 points



Category - What would Buffet say (Data from the Annual Report 2022 [7]):

Criteria to read in detail:

https://app.getquin.com/activity/XcuRrJwmyP


Income Statement:

-Net margin: 2022: 39%, 2021: 12.89%*, 2020: 23.54% -->positive! (Buffet's target: >20%)

*In 2021 operating costs and depreciation and amortization quite high in relation to comparative periods.

-Gross margin: 2022: 88.9%, --> positive! (Buffets target: at least 40%)

-Selling/administrative and other overheads: 3.4% of sales --> positive! (Buffet's target: max. 30-40%)

-Interest expense: 30.78% of operating profit -->negative! (Buffet's target: <15%) Per HJA 2023 leicht rückläufig.


Key Note Income Statement: Gute Margen und geringe operative Kosten. Zinsaufwand etwas zu hoch!


Balance Sheet:

-Eigene Aktien (Treasury Shares): Nein! -->negative (no shareholder value through buybacks)!

Debt < 4xEBIT: Ja! →positiv!

-Verhältnis kurzfr. Fremdkapital zu kurzfr. Vermögen: 0,81 -->positive! Ideally <1 -->The cash position alone covers 68%. This means that 68% of current liabilities could be paid off immediately!

-Equity ratio: 33.2% (2022)->in order. But the target should be at least 40%.

-Yield on equity: 18.84% →positive (>15%)!

-Goodwill: 5% of total assets and 15% of equity -->reassuring and therefore no cause for concern! For further details on goodwill:

https://app.getquin.com/activity/ymidZwhlTk


Key note balance sheet: Solid debt situation with sufficient cash and therefore flexibility.


Cash flow statement:

2021 (previous year) in brackets, figures in CAD (in thousands):

Operating cash flow 1,832,983 (1,609,295)

-Cash flow from investing activities -629,683 (-1,030,863)

=Free cash flow 1,203,300 (578,432)

-Cash flow from financing activities -604,837 (-225,679) -->Main components are debt repayments and dividends paid.


Investments: 76% of net profit (Buffet's target: <50%) -->negative! However, this is understandable given the investment-intensive nature of the business. I therefore do not see this quite so critically.



Company classification according to Peter Lynch [12]:


-->Slow Grower (2-3%) or Stalwart (5%, max. 12%)



Peer group/competition [5]:


Here I have taken the liberty of using the Traderfox Peer Group Check. Attached is a picture with a few relevant comparative figures of selected companies. Northland performs quite well (good net margin, fair P/E ratio):


Crescent Point Energy Corp (CA) P/E 4.37 -->but focus on oil+gas

Iberdrola (ESP): P/E ratio 16.52

Orsted (DK): P/E ratio 11.49

Energiekontor (DE): P/E 16.52 -->Whereby Energiekontor does not exclusively operate wind farms itself but resells them to producers and is therefore a potential business partner of Northland.

Siemens Gamesa (ESP): P/E ratio negative!

RWE (DE): P/E RATIO 9.32

EnBW (DE): P/E ratio 13.11


You can find my own analyses of Iberdrola and Energiekontor here:

https://app.getquin.com/activity/vXGiuLuFAK

https://app.getquin.com/activity/vrtMBgZQJu



Competitive Advantage/Burggraben:


-Over 30 years of experience in the renewable energy sector. +

-Focus on business partners with good creditworthiness. +

-Good margins, especially for an investment-intensive company. ++



Risks/Weaknesses:


-Impairment risk -

Similar to Orsted, there is a short-term risk of impairment. See the following article:


https://www.iwr.de/news/rsted-kuendigt-milliardenschwere-wertminderungen-fuer-us-wind-portfolio-an-aktie-bricht-ein-news38420


Due to the low goodwill, however, I am reasonably reassured, even if wind farms are of course recognized as the main item in fixed assets. There is still a risk here.


-Dependence on wind conditions

This is accompanied by sales/profit fluctuations, which can also be seen from the last half-year figures:


https://www.ecoreporter.de/artikel/nortland-power-wenig-wind-l%C3%A4sst-umsatz-und-gewinn-sinken/


--Low growth, compared to the industry. --



Chart:


Northland has been in a steady downward trend for over a year. This looks anything but pretty and is also reflected in a low P/E ratio. It could well be that impairment risks and low growth compared to the market as a whole are playing a major role and that short-term confidence has been lost somewhat as a result.



Analyst estimates [15]:


Buy: 6

Add: 9

Hold: 0

Reduce: 0

Sell: 0



Conclusion:


Nortland Power is a well-positioned company with a good margin. The low growth is particularly disturbing, which is why I do not expect a favorable valuation. Nevertheless, there is still a good dividend yield (therefore possibly something for @Simpson or @GoDividend 😁). An initial entry could soon become interesting, although you should first invest with a smaller tranche in order to be able to buy more if the price falls.


Let's come back to Northland's strategic goals. Will these be achieved?


A. Secure and predictable cash flows: As an electricity supplier, solid and predictable cash flows will certainly be generated. Especially as a slow grower (Peter Lynch), these should also be predictable! However, due to the rather one-sided focus on wind power, the company is also somewhat one-sidedly diversified and dependent on wind. There is certainly still some potential here if you want to position yourself even more broadly for the future.


B. Shareholder value: Certainly given by the dividend. Share buybacks could certainly be considered in order to bring about some price stability. The share price performance is currently anything but good for shareholders. I also see the problem here in the lack of diversification in the business areas and the poor news situation.


C. Good/sensible strategic orientation: See point A. I still see potential for improvement! The good margins could be used more sensibly and aggressively! Investments in Asia are already in the early stages. So a first step has been taken.


D. Sustainability in the projects: Certainly given. Investments are made primarily in Asian and European countries with sustainable projects (wind power / PV). However, I believe that a little more could be done. As an electricity supplier with a green focus, the company is still too dependent on the gas business, even if the main revenue driver is wind farms. A "NetZero" target for climate neutrality has been announced. However, my subjective perception is that this could progress faster than communicated, as there is already a strong focus on wind.


Net Zero Target - Scope 1, 2 and 3

"As part of the Company's purpose to help build a carbon free world, it is establishing a net zero initiative that aims to achieve zero emissions across its operations by 2040. Efforts will focus on reducing GHG emissions intensity from Scope 1 & 2 by 65% by 2030 (from a 2019 baseline) while targeting a science-aligned net zero over all emissions scopes by 2040. "


https://www.northlandpower.com/en/news/northland-power-announces-2023-financial-guidance_-expands-canadian-development-portfolio-and-establ.aspx


Perhaps the strategy is also somewhat reflected in the Canadian government's climate policy. CO2 emissions per capita in Canada are 14.3 (Germany: 8.1). Greenhouse gases from oil and gas account for 28.2% of total emissions, which is quite high [14]. So there is still potential!



As always, no investment advice!


At the request of @Malte123
@RealMrKrabs

I hope you enjoyed it 😊



For further analysis take a look here:

https://getqu.in/XWDDD9/


#theaccountant

#aktienanalyse

#stocks

#analyse

#aktien



Sources:

[1]

https://www.northlandpower.com/en/investor-centre/investor-fact-sheet.aspx

[2]

https://www.northlandpower.com/en/about-northland/about-northland.aspx

[3]

https://www.northlandpower.com/en/about-northland/corporate-strategy.aspx

[4]

https://wir-lieben-aktien.de/aktienanalyse/northland-power-aktie-analyse-die-beste-renewable-energy-aktie/

[5]

https://viz.traderfox.com/peer-group-tabelle/CA6665111002/EI/northland-power-inc/aktien-386899-2673015-386744-15116688

[6]

https://de.marketscreener.com/kurs/aktie/NORTHLAND-POWER-INC-1411045/fundamentals/

[7]

https://www.northlandpower.com/en/resources/Corporate%20Reports/NPI-2022-Annual-Report-FINAL.pdf

[8]

https://www.northlandpower.com/en/resources/Corporate%20Reports/2023%20Q2%20Quarterly%20Report_%20ENG.pdf

[9]

https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datacurrent.html

[10]

https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/170383/umfrage/inflationsrate-in-kanada/

[11] https://www.ceicdata.com/de/indicator/canada/policy-rate

[12]

https://www.ceicdata.com/de/indicator/canada/government-debt--of-nominal-gdp

[13]

https://strategyinvest.de/6-typen-von-aktien-nach-peter-lynch/

[14]

https://www.gtai.de/de/trade/kanada/specials/kanada-volle-kraft-fuer-den-klimaschutz-795782

[15] https://de.marketscreener.com/kurs/aktie/NORTHLAND-POWER-INC-15914416/analystenerwartungen/

[16]

https://aktie.traderfox.com/visualizations/CA6665111002/EI/northland-power-inc


Graphics:

Facility and Office types:

https://www.northlandpower.com/en/resources/Corporate%20Reports/NPI-2022-Annual-Report-FINAL.pdf


https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=4CAE001371&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=&Action=Launch


Company homepage:

https://www.northlandpower.com/en/index.aspx





attachment
attachment
attachment
attachment
122
59 Commentaires

image de profil
Thank you for doing the work with this stock presentation; read with interest on my part.
23
image de profil
1Année
*Expansion from current approx. 3.5 GW to 12 GW installed capacity by 2030. Ultimately, I see a risk minimization due to diversification across countries and continents. I am invested relatively heavily myself (mid 4-digit amount).
5
image de profil
@Kohlmeyse yes that is definitely true. It has already been recognized .
1
image de profil
5
image de profil
Great contribution! Thank you 👍
2
image de profil
🤝 thank you Jonas.. With keppel corp, iberdrola and FM I am in the area but now I think well positioned... Will watch this but ☺️
2
image de profil
@ccf and 👍 simply by tradition 😘
2
image de profil
1
image de profil
Top report, thank you very much! Big praise also for the indication of the sources!!! (Other reports often "smell" very strongly after chat gpt)
1
image de profil
1
image de profil
Canada and dividends. I'm out of that. There's no point in having your returns trimmed.
1
image de profil
1Année
@Anilo then you don't know about the advance withholding tax reduction and it seems to be too much effort for you to recover the remaining 15% via the income tax return.
2
image de profil
@Kohlmeyse
Would have to research again, if you say so. USA is easy and runs automatically when the 1000€ are used up. I'm currently giving France and Canada a wide berth.
image de profil
1Année
@Anilo The USA also has 15% withholding tax. ;)
image de profil
@Kohlmeyse yes, but I will automatically be charged again as soon as the 1000€ are used up. Canada is different.
image de profil
1Année
@AniloAfter your 1000 € tax-free amount, you only get "offset" if you make an income tax return or a compensation is made with your loss pot. So it's the same in green 😉.
image de profil
@Kohlmeyse hi. Can not write to you directly. Have looked again and with Canada and France you have to "expensive and laborious" to recover the tax. I would love to get total or Brookfield in the depot 😕
image de profil
1Année
@Anilo You can have the withholding tax reduced to 15% for both. This is offered by DKB, for example. The double taxation agreement stipulates that you can reclaim a maximum of 15% of the final withholding tax. This is done via the income tax return and is neither expensive nor complicated.
image de profil
1Année
@Anilo Why Brookfield? The dividend was cut considerably.
image de profil
@Kohlmeyse have not followed the stock the last weeks and months, maybe not a buy at the moment. But then just enbridge zb Am at scalable and see no easy way to get dividends without large deductions from Canada or France 😕
image de profil
@TheAccountant89 big thanks! Very interesting written. As expected, no disappointment $NPI.
1
image de profil
Thank you very much for your added value! I will include in the watchlist.
1
image de profil
Canada has 25% withholding tax, not 15%. A refund is complicated and expensive (if then only possible with custodian bank; if the offers this).
1
image de profil
@DusselDuck Various brokers offer the automatic advance exemption. Is actually quite uncomplicated. I mean at DKB for about 10€. So that can be worthwhile quickly times.
image de profil
@TheAccountant89 I think Canada only at comdirekt? (But I'm not quite sure)
image de profil
1Année
@DusselDuck I set it up myself at DKB. It cost me €11.99 @TheAccountant89. "Nothing expensive and complicated". I guess you wrote that out of your ignorance @DusselDuck? Ultimately, it is only the way you know.
image de profil
1Année
@Simpson Why are you "liking" this? That's only half the truth. I have had the withholding tax reduction at DKB reduced to 15%, which I then get back via my income tax return.
image de profil
@Kohlmeyse well that means paperwork in addition costs a fee, and as far as I know it is only limited to 3 years 🤔 just want to have it and will continue to invest only in 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇩🇪🇳🇱🇵🇰🇯🇵
1
image de profil
1Année
@Simpson the effort is minimal and so are the costs. But well, if it already fails at that, then it should not be. The three years are not the case for all countries. Only for those with a certificate of residence. Everyone must know for themselves. ✌️
image de profil
1Année
@Simpson with Japan, by the way, you can be completely exempt from withholding tax 😉 .
image de profil
@Kohlmeyse Because of ignorance: 1. didn't you write before that it is 15% withholding tax in Canada? 2. you know the difference between advance exemption and refund? I had written about refund. And this is definitely in the case of Canada: complicated and expensive.
image de profil
1Année
@DusselDuck before I go the way of the refund, I rather apply for a reduction and this is 1. not expensive and 2. uncomplicated. If you always outline only the difficult / elaborate way, then I would of course also leave the fingers of such investments. Sorry, was just the impression that arises when this reference remains far 😉 I am always very direct. That's just my way. Please do not take it personally. ✌️
1
image de profil
1
Voir toutes les 5 autres réponses
image de profil
1Année
So sorry, but everyone who writes here that it is not worthwhile or too complicated because of the withholding tax, he simply has no idea. At DKB, for example, you can set up a withholding tax reduction (for 11.99 €) and then the withholding tax rate goes from 25% to 15%. This 15% is then also exactly the rate that can be reclaimed via the double taxation agreement via the income tax return. Accordingly, you do not "lose" any money. It is just not directly available.
1
image de profil
1
image de profil
Thank you so much!!!
1
I hope the bottom has now been reached and things are looking up again
1
@timg1355 Hopefully, the €14 level will be held. Earnings are in two weeks, at the latest then there will hopefully be a trend reversal.
image de profil
Thank you very much for the article. The downward slide could be coming to an end and the bottoming out could have begun. If we finally see a higher high, we could buy more.
1
image de profil
How is the dismantling and disposal taken into account in the balance sheet ?
image de profil
@KleinviehmachtMist what do you mean exactly? Asset retirement obligations? If that's what you mean, it's like in every IFRS financial statement in the provisions (or capitalization of costs - gross presentation). However, since it only concerns the leased part or the assets (e.g. land) that would have to be returned at some point, it only affects a small portion of Northland.
1
image de profil
@TheAccountant89 That is always the risk with such investments. Every year, the return is blown out of the water, and in the end there is nothing left for the dismantling.
1
image de profil
@KleinviehmachtMist I do not see this as critical. But of course, you have to pay attention 👍
1
image de profil
What are the shareholder benefits ?
image de profil
@TheInfluencerDE What do you mean? I have described shareholder value, if that is what you mean
Utilisateur supprimé
1Année
Le commentaire a été supprimé
image de profil
@Boarkeinname Compared with the P/E ratio, the main effects of the differences between depreciation and amortization and actual capital expenditure, as well as non-cash expenses, are taken into account. As a rule, the operating cash flow is used. In my valuation it is the free cash flow. Because only the cash relevant aspects are used in this ratio, it is less manipulable than the P/E ratio. In order to get a greater significance, you have to use comparable companies, as with the P/E ratio. In principle, however, the ratio is higher than the P/E ratio.
Utilisateur supprimé
1Année
Le commentaire a été supprimé
image de profil
@Boarkeinname You can't make a general statement like that. It also depends on the business model and how solid other key figures are. However, if the goodwill accounts for approx. 50% of the equity and thus probably also more than 30% of the total assets, then I would at least take a closer look. It is simply not a good thing and bears the risk of price corrections should impairment occur. It is always a risk assessment, taking into account other key figures and the business model. If the risk of an impairment is considered to be low, it is also okay if the goodwill is somewhat higher. In the current overall economic situation, the risk is generally somewhat higher, which is why you should simply keep an eye on goodwill.
image de profil
@Boarkeinname Have a look here as well. I have written a few articles on goodwill: -Goodwill https://app.getquin.com/activity/ymidZwhlTk -Impairment according to IAS 36 https://app.getquin.com/activity/vCLDnzrHFv?lang=de&utm_source=sharing -Impairments: a major topic! The Swiss market in analysis https://getqu.in/mkycv4/
Utilisateur supprimé
1Année
Le commentaire a été supprimé
image de profil
@Boarkeinname yes as described above. You can't make a general statement.
Utilisateur supprimé
1Année
Le commentaire a été supprimé
image de profil
@Boarkeinname Yes, exactly. Profit can still be manipulated somewhat (higher depreciation/impairment, provisions, etc.). Cash is cash. This key figure should actually be used more frequently.
Voir une réponse de plus
Participez à la conversation