1Yrยท
Investment Decision

๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ---๐€๐ค๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐›๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ฅ๐ž---๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ


๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™จ๐™š: "๐™๐™ง๐™š๐™ž๐™๐™š๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™จ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ง๐™œ๐™ž๐™š๐™ฃ" ๐™–๐™ช๐™› ๐™™๐™š๐™ข ๐™‘๐™ค๐™ง๐™ข๐™–๐™ง๐™จ๐™˜๐™. ๐™’๐™–๐™˜๐™๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ช๐™ข ๐™™๐™ช๐™ง๐™˜๐™ ๐™๐™ฃ๐™–๐™—๐™รค๐™ฃ๐™œ๐™ž๐™œ๐™ ๐™š๐™ž๐™ฉ ๐™ซ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™‚๐™–๐™จ ๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™ ร–๐™ก!


--- 7c Solarparken --- Energiekontor --- Solaredge ---


For the next stock presentation, I am deviating a bit from my previous way of stock analysis. Since all three stocks were requested by the community and belong to the "Green Energy" sector, especially PV and wind farms, I would like to focus here on the fundamental quality and compare the stocks somewhat in this respect. If you want to get something in the field of green energy in your portfolio, you certainly can not avoid to compare the values. Feel free to give me feedback for this kind of analysis and vote which value appeals to you the most :)


๐—œ๐—ป๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜๐˜€๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€:

I. Short stock presentation

II. key figures

III. relative company valuation

IV. Intrinsic company valuation

V. Conclusion


In chapter II to IV I will create rankings. There are points per category, in the form of "+".


+++ = best rating

+ = worst rating


In Chapter V (Conclusion) I will summarize the ratings and choose a winner.


๐—œ. ๐—ž๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜‡๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ธ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ด


-7c Solarparken:

Solar power plant operator headquartered in Bayreuth, Germany, focus on German solar market as well as expansion of the Belgian market as a second mainstay (according to the 2021 AR, they are starting intensive expansion there).[7]


Revenues: Revenues are mainly generated from the operation, maintenance and management services of the own IPP portfolio (solar parks), as well as own solar plants and PV estate (leasing and development of own land). According to the Annual Report 2021, 7C Solarparken operates more than 180 solar parks with a total capacity of 333 Mwp. The Group's wind energy portfolio consists of two wind power plants acquired and operated in 2019. Both plants are located in a windy region in Rhineland-Palatinate.

Revenue segments:

-Electricity sales (97.6% of total sales).

-Revenues from services

-Other


-Energy Office:

Planning, construction to operational management of wind farms in Germany and abroad (mainly EU). The company is headquartered in Bremen. Business segment was expanded in 2010 to include solar energy.[6] Energiekontor has 17 locations worldwide (acc. to AR 2021).

DE: 30 wind and solar farms; UK: 3 wind farms; Portugal: 4 wind farms.


Revenue segments:

-Power generation (stable, growing revenue, dependent on electricity price).

-Operations management (stable sales for commercial and technical management of plants)

-Projecting (volatile but growth driver, as revenue only comes from sale of turbines - but 50% of turbines are retained and used in the power generation segment. Project pipeline but growing)

Shareholder structure: Energiekontor advertises in the annual reports with a shareholder structure where the founders own 50.35% of the shares directly (free float at 36.18%). -->positive!


-Solaredge:

Leading global provider of smart energy technology, especially PV inverters, energy storage systems or EV chargers. Headquarter is located in Israel. Compared to Energiekontor and 7c Solarparken more active in the e-mobility sector. One could say that Solaredge offers solutions that make PV systems, which are built by 7c Solarparken or Energiekontor, more efficient. Their technology is designed to make PV systems work more efficiently, even in dirt, snow or shade. About 50% of their sales are still in the US (Europe about 25%). [5]


-Comparison:

-->The business areas are very similar. Nevertheless, the companies have partly different strategies. For example, Solaredge has EV Chargers in its portfolio. Energiekontor also keeps only about 50% of the built plants in their fixed assets for power supply, while the rest is sold directly at a profit. There is thus overlap (especially in the PV business), as well as different orientations. All are to some extent dependent on the price of electricity or even wind speeds for the wind farms. Depending on the electricity production and price, the revenue can be different. A good example is an interim announcement from Solarparken. Thus, the following was communicated [13]:


"Revenues for the first three months of 2022 were EUR 14.1 million, a stellar increase of 70% compared to the same period last year (EUR 8.3 million). The increase was entirely due to electricity sales, which rose by 73%, and was based on the following three factors: (I) portfolio growth contributed EUR 2.1 million to the increase in revenues, while (II) improved weather conditions contributed EUR 1.6 million. (III) Finally, electricity prices impacted electricity sales by EUR 2.2 million."



๐—œ๐—œ. ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป


Abnormalities in the balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows (Sorted per category by placement):


-Net margin:

1. Energiekontor: 23.1% (No R&D and thus better margin than Solaredge) +++

2. 7c Solarparken: 18.8% (No R&D and therefore better margin than Solaredge) ++

3. solaredge: 8.6% +


-Gross margin:

1. 7c Solarparken: 92.68% (hardly any intensive margin business available) +++

2. Energiekontor: 70.73% ++

3. Solaredge: 32.04% (R&D 11% of sales) +


-Observations in the income statement (P&L) with an impact on the margin:


7c Solarparken: Higher depreciation, amortization and impairment at 7c Solarparken, resulting in 2nd place net margin and 1st place gross margin. Gem. AR 2021 came out:


"The Group's goodwill review regarding the feasibility of the project pipeline concluded that there are no solar projects in the Amatec business operation that are expected to be realized in the next 3 years. Therefore, this business operation was fully impaired in the fiscal year (EUR 104 thousand)."


-->This reduces the net margin at 7c Solarparken once!


Solaredge: Higher expenses in research and development and marketing. Solaredge is said to have a technology advantage over the competition, which is to be maintained through research and development (R&D). -->R&D = 11.18% of total revenue


--&gt;Ratio of short-term debt to short-term assets (should be <1 sein):

1. Solaredge: 0,3 +++

2. 7c Solarparken: 0,49 ++ **

-->7c Solarparken has mostly long-term debt (positive). However, these are quite high (53.49% of total assets), so debt is higher than 4x EBIT (negative)

3. Energiekontor: 0.6 +

--&gt;Energiekontor has mainly long term debt (positive). However, these are quite high (53.18% of total assets), which makes the debt higher than 4x EBIT (negative).


**7c Solarparken declares according to AR 2021 that solar and wind parks of the company are basically financed in a ratio of 25% equity and 75% debt.


-Goodwill:

Energiekontor: n/a

Solaredge: not relevant (4.5% of total assets)

7c Solarparken: not relevant

--&gt;No valuation, as goodwill does not play a role in any of them.


-Ratio of interest expenses to EBIT (important key figure due to high debt!):

1. Solaredge: 9.6% +++

2. Energiekontor: 27.28% ++

3. 7c Solarparken: 38.9% +


--&gt; Especially 7c Solarparken worsens the net margin due to high interest charges, which they can however cushion by a generally good margin (see above).


-Share buybacks:

1. Energiekontor: Yes! +++

2. Solaredge: Yes, but very small and irregular (last time March 2022) ++

3. 7c Solarparken: No! +


-Piotroski F-Score [9] [11] [12]:

1. 7c Solarparken: 7/9 +++

2. Energiekontor: 6/9 ++

3. solaredge: 6/9 ++


-Traderfox Quality and Growth Check [9] [11] [12]:

1st Solaredge: 14/15 (quality); 12/15 (growth) +++

2. Energiekontor: 9/15 (quality); 7/15 (growth) ++

3. 7c Solarparken: 8/15 (quality) ; 7/15 (growth) +


-Rule of 40 (&gt;40 = positive):

Revenue growth + EBITDA margin (alternatively FCF margin).

1. 7c Solarparken: 10% + 86.5% = 96.5% +++

2. solaredge: 25% + 21.5% = 46.5% ++

3. Energiekontor: 15% + 30.6% = 45.6% +++ 2.



๐—œ๐—œ๐—œ. ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—จ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ด


Market Averages Green and Renewable Energy [1]:

KGV: 36.54 (EU).

PEG: 0.90 (eu) --&gt;40.4% growth! [1]

KGV: 69.30 (USA)

PEG: 4.78 (USA) --&gt;14.49% growth! [1]


Market Average Europe general [8]:

Euro Stoxx 50 P/E as of 05/14/2022: 14.34


7c Solarparken [2]:

KGV (2022): 25.2

KGV (2023): 28.0

KGV (2024): 38.1

PEG 2022: 2.52 (growth assumptions according to chapter IV - intrinsic valuation)

Median P/E ratio (historical): 23,48 [14]


Energiekontor [3]:

KGV (2022): 31.0

KGV (2023): 27.3

KGV (2024): 21.9

PEG 2022: 1.55 (growth assumptions according to chapter IV - intrinsic assessment)


Solaredge [4]:

KGV (2022): 65.9

KGV (2023): 39.6

KGV (2024): 31.8

PEG 2022: 2.64 (growth assumptions according to chapter IV - intrinsic valuation)

Median P/E ratio (historical): 49,06 [15]


Placement relative valuation:

1. Energiekontor +++

2.. 7c Solarparken ++

3. solaredge +



๐—œ๐—ฉ. ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—จ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ด


General market data regarding growth and WACC:


-Historical growth rates Green Energy for the last 5 years [1]:

Profit (EU): 29.54%

Sales (EU): 21.24%

Profit (USA): -6.45%

Sales (USA): -24.64%


--Expected growth rates Green Energy [1]:

EPS (EU): 40.40% --&gt;next 5 years.

Sales (EU): 54.11% --&gt;next 2 years

EPS (USA): 14.50% --&gt;next 5 years

Sales (USA): 22.70% --&gt;next 2 years


--Determination of WACC

-WACC Industrial Production [10]

6,2%-8,1%

-WACC Green &amp; Renewable Energy - self-determined

6,5%

--&gt; conservative assumption at &gt;7%


1) Energiekontor


-Growth rate assumption:

Growth assumptions net result future [3]:

Growth 2022 to 2023: 13.1%; growth 2023 to 2024: 24.78%.

Historical EBIT growth (10 yrs): 10.95% [9].

According to Annual Report 2021 planning EBIT to โ‚ฌ55-60 million by 2023.

Economic growth according to Annual Report 2021 across all countries (DE, GB, Port, FR, USA): 5.48%.


--&gt;Growth rate: 15-20% (based on company level and industry).

Classification according to Peter Lynch: Medium Growth - Fast Grower


The GB 2020 also assumes a growth path of 15-20%, which again confirms my assumption. Due to the good project pipeline, whereby many plants can be completed (and sold), this is quite realistic in my opinion.



--&gt;DCF calculation results in a fair price in the range of 85-90โ‚ฌ.

Current price: 89.5โ‚ฌ (04.06.2022)


2) 7c Solarparken


--Determination of growth rate:

Growth assumptions net income future [2]:

2022 to 2023 growth: -22%; growth 2023 to 2024: 5.66%.

Historical EBIT growth (10 yr): 12.34% [11]

EBITDA forecast according to AR 2021 for 2022: approx. 3%.


Growth rate for 7c Solarparken: 5-10% (based on company level and industry)

Classification according to Peter Lynch: Medium growth (Stalwart)



--&gt;DCF calculation due to high debt in the pennystock sector! --&gt;DCF is hardly applicable/gives no valid results. Not applicable!


3) Solaredge


--Determination of growth rate:

Historical EBIT growth (10 yrs): 1n/a, as positive EBIT only from 2015 [12].

EBIT growth (2 yrs): 32.4% in 2021; 10.16% in 2020.

Growth assumptions net income future [4]:

2022 to 2023 growth: 69%; 2023 to 2024 growth: 23%.


Solaredge growth rate: 20-25%.

Classification according to Peter Lynch: Fast Grower



--&gt;DCF calculation not possible! FCF was negative the last 2 years! No application! Alternatives do not bring valid values. Valuation is basically too high.


Placement intrinsic valuation:

1. Energiekontor +++

2. 7c Solarparken + (negative - high debt)

3. Solaredge + (negative - negative FCF)



๐—ฉ. ๐—™๐—ฎ๐˜‡๐—ถ๐˜


Total ratings (+):

1st Energiekontor : 22

2. solaregde: 19

2. 7c Solarparken: 19


๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€Winner ENERGIEKONTOR!!!! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€


Conclusion:


I find all 3 companies very exciting and well positioned. Energiekontor still seems to me the most favorably valued for an entry. However, the bottom line is very close. In addition, my analysis is not conclusive and qualitative factors such as management and business model only very briefly.


If you like this kind of analysis, I can go into other stocks on request and evaluate them purely from a fundamental point of view. This will make the analyses shorter. However, you should always not ignore the qualitative aspects (competitive advantage, market, management, etc.)! But that is up to you.


Suggestion:

Feel free to write in the comments if you would like to see a fundamental evaluation on a specific value. The analyses should then be short and crisp with the key findings. Feel free to link me on other posts with a request for an analysis. Please forgive me that I will only analyze values that convince me myself and find exciting :) As so often applies but also here... "who does not ask, who does not win" :)


As usual, you can also find my collected analyses under the following link:

https://app.getquin.com/activity/YyIXcpDduz?lang=de&utm_source=sharing


As always, no investment advice!


#theaccountant

#aktienanalyse

#stocks


Sources:

[1] https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datacurrent.html

[2] https://ch.marketscreener.com/kurs/aktie/7C-SOLARPARKEN-AG-16783954/fundamentals/

[3] https://ch.marketscreener.com/kurs/aktie/ENERGIEKONTOR-AG-435840/fundamentals/

[4] https://ch.marketscreener.com/kurs/aktie/SOLAREDGE-TECHNOLOGIES-I-21452890/fundamentals/

[5] https://www.solaredge.com/de/corporate/about-us

[6] https://www.energiekontor.de/unternehmen/kurzportrait.html

[7] http://www.solarparken.com/index.php

[8] https://www.boerse.de/kgvs/KGV-Euro-Stoxx-50

[9] https://aktie.traderfox.com/visualizations/DE0005313506/EI/energiekontor-ag

[10] https://pwc-tools.de/kapitalkosten/

[11] https://aktie.traderfox.com/visualizations/DE000A11QW68/ETR/7c-solarparken-ag

[12] https://aktie.traderfox.com/visualizations/US83417M1045/DI/solaredge-technologies-inc

[13] http://www.solarparken.com/Finanzberichte/20220331%20Bericht%20Deutsch%20.pdf

[14] https://eulerpool.com/aktie/DE000A11QW68/A11QW6/HRPK.DE/7C-Solarparken-Aktie

[15] https://eulerpool.com/aktie/US83417M1045/A14QVM/SEDG/Solaredge-Technologies-Aktie


Graphs Source: https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/legislation-to-promote-use-of-renewable-energy-172057


Company homepage:

http://www.solarparken.com/

https://www.energiekontor.de/index.html

https://www.solaredge.com/de


Share presentation on request:

@Jh --&gt;Solaredge

@Wellenreiter --&gt;7c Solarparken

@Koenigmidas --&gt;Energiekontor

Energiekontor
31.76%
Solaredge Tech
32.94%
7C Solarparken
35.31%
507 Votes
44
20 Comments

profile image
And my bookmark list is getting even longer.... @ccf
โ€ข
4
โ€ข
@ccf
Top Post. Very interesting overview of the companies. Since I hold 7C Solar, of course, all the more exciting.
โ€ข
2
โ€ข
profile image
The only thing missing now is the share presentation at the request of @Divmann
โ€ข
1
โ€ข
Show answer
profile image
I've been interested in Solar for a long time, but at the moment it seems like the wrong time to get in... I'd be interested in a Palantir/Aker analysis from you ๐Ÿ‘€ Palantir in particular would get a good beating there.@ccf
โ€ข
1
โ€ข
Show answer
profile image
โ€ข
1
โ€ข
profile image
Thanks for making me sit down tomorrow and look at it seperat again. @ccf
โ€ข
1
โ€ข
profile image
Nice thank you โค๏ธ
โ€ข
1
โ€ข
profile image
You are the hammer. @ccf
โ€ข
1
โ€ข
profile image
Will read tomorrow in peace, but since it is from @TheAccountant89, I leave as a precaution already times @ccf
โ€ข
1
โ€ข
profile image
First of all @ccf The valuation of the equity ratio makes the stock I hold in my portfolio (7c Solarparken) look really worse than Energiekontor. But the last figures were top. In the long term, Energiekontor may have even more potential. I let 7c as the last 4 years just run. Thank you for this elaborate comparison. The comparisons in detail, especially to Energiekontor, I must lead me again more closely to mind๐Ÿ˜Š nice weekend and thank you
โ€ข
1
โ€ข
Show answer

Join the conversation