15H·

Why Big Tech is forcing Donald Trump to achieve world peace

Okay, I don't know how to start this. This is going to be a lot of information in a very dense text and it can be confusing, but it's worth sticking with it. Even if it will take me a while to get to what exactly this means for investors.


So ... I recently read through the official White House National Security Strategy and there are some really revolutionary things in there.


For the first time there is a separate chapter on the EU and also on Germany. So the fact that Germany is officially considered a threat to the security interests of the USA would be something one would like to read in the newspaper - provided, of course, there were honest and capable journalists in the country.


Basically, the paper hails criticism: our governments violate basic democratic values, censor freedom of expression, suppress the opposition and let lots of migrants into the country who are not on good terms with either Europe or the USA. Nothing new, but still interesting. What is much more exciting, however, is that Donald Trump is saying something that no president has dared to say since John F. Kennedy - for well-known reasons: namely that the Americans a) no longer want to expand NATO and use it as their primary instrument of power b) want peace with Russia.


There has already been much speculation about the closeness between Trump and Putin. But no one has ever written about the real economic reason why peace with Russia is in the actual interests of the Americans. And that's because you all haven't understood how much AI has really changed foreign policy.


It definitely used to be the case that wars were in America's interests. At least since they got involved in the Second World War - actually without necessity - and were able to increase their prosperity considerably as a result - wars were seen as something great or at least necessary in America. In the 1930s, the USA was at an economic low point. However, after they had supplied half the world with weapons and loans and also plundered important patents, human capital and raw materials, the true rise to superpower status began.


From this moment on, a business model was born: create chaos, sabotage enemies and ultimately sell weapons to both sides. A typical left-wing phrase says that there is no war in which the Americans have not made money.


This has fundamentally changed under Trump. War for the sake of war should no longer be waged - at least not where it is important, in Europe. While Biden still saw the liberation of Ukraine and the destruction of the Nordstream II pipelines as the highest civilizational goal, the Trump administration sees it as an existential threat to Germany that the chemical industry $BAS (+1,16 %) which is dependent on Russian gas, no longer receives it in Germany and is therefore migrating entirely to China, where the pipelines are still located.


In other words, while Biden still saw selling us American LNG as a net positive, Trump considers the economic erosion of the ally to be more serious than financing Russia.


And while previous presidents would have praised the fact that the Federal Chancellor is putting our country into debt for generations to build up its armed forces, the White House condemns this approach with the words "lack of self-confidence"


Incidentally, even the Americans themselves are financing Russia and now we are finally getting to what AI has to do with it. Because not many people may have noticed it yet, but the total market cap of all US defense companies $LMT (+0,75 %)
$BA (+2,61 %)
$NOC (+0,44 %)
$RTX (+0,95 %)
$GD (+0,95 %) and co. is now only 1.3 trillion dollars - you don't even get 1/3 of $GOOGL (-0,49 %)


The big money is no longer made with weapons, but with technology. And while Biden and Obama were mainly concerned with moving oil and weapons, Trump is concerned with a) raw materials b) energy and c) supply chains.


I'm lucky that I'm dealing with intelligent readers here who don't need me to explain how microchips are made, so I can cut the supply chain thing short. In short, Trump of course needs the lenses from Zeiss and the EUV lithography from $ASML (+5,63 %) and therefore has an interest in ensuring that Europe doesn't sink into chaos. At the same time, of course, chips also need rare earths such as palladium - 50% of the global supply is currently in Russian hands. Incidentally, more palladium is believed to be in the Arctic, i.e. in the hands of Russia, Canada and ... Greenland.


The fact that AI needs a lot of energy is also a widely explained and already understood thesis here. What is less in the spotlight is that, in addition to $IREN (-0,77 %) with their solar panels, there is another important energy source for AI, namely small modular reactors (SMRs). I think I also shared a news item 1-2 years ago that the Big Techs are starting to build nuclear-powered data centers.


Now these are very special power plants. SMRs are essentially the latest generation of nuclear power plants, which are more efficient and, above all, much cleaner than conventional nuclear power plants. There's just one catch: you need specially enriched uranium and guess where you can get it: Russia. Specifically, the uranium comes from the ROSATOM group which, incidentally, has not yet been sanctioned as a result of the war in Ukraine. Other countries such as Kazakhstan with its Kazatomprom group also have plenty of uranium, but are not allowed to enrich it like Russia because they do not have nuclear power status.


Ok, I may have promised a bit too much in the title. I don't know whether we will really end up with world peace now, but at least we have overcome the age where it was simply claimed that some dictator had used weapons of mass destruction and the country was then reduced to rubble over a period of years. All in all, there is a good chance that the US government and the US military will in future work hard for the welfare of all shareholders of $NVDA (+2,69 %)
$AMZN (+0,76 %)
$GOOGL (-0,49 %)
$GOOG (-0,54 %)
$META (+1,13 %)
$MSFT (-0,3 %) and $TSLA (+0,51 %) shareholders.

attachment
35
18 Commentaires

image de profil
I also think that the Trump administration is committed to the interests of tech companies. Nevertheless, I don't see that his policies will lead to a net reduction in conflicts. The disregard for international law by Russia, Israel and, more recently, the USA is widening the corridor of injustice, along which other states will also let off steam. India, Saudi Arabia and China are delighted to see the USA's imperial power play. In this respect, a raw materials agreement with Russia at the expense of Ukraine will certainly be profitable in the medium term. In the longer term, however, many other concentrations of power are gaining strength worldwide, possibly even united by their antipathy towards the USA. We have been seeing free trade agreements in the Asian region for some years now, as well as bold self-confidence on the part of South American and African states.
6
image de profil
@T-Dax Conflicts will probably not become fewer, but smaller in scale, because wars are now bad for business. Iran and Venezuela in particular show what the future looks like - quick, precise strikes instead of material battles and positional fighting.

International law is becoming obsolete and, in fact, the legitimacy of the International Court of Justice in The Hague has never been recognized by any US president. International law has always been cynically designed so that only Western countries could invoke international law.

The fact that the law of the strongest now applies quite openly is of course bad for the Western and European states that want to be humanistic and liberal in their self-image, because it is repugnant to them to justify themselves with national interests. European foreign policy can only take place under the pretext of doing good and helping everyone else.

As you rightly say, the other pragmatic states are also totally up for this new world. China alone, with its half-dozen border conflicts, naturally feels emboldened to enforce them militarily and violently if the USA's willingness to go to war declines.

The Asian free trade agreements are a good thing for everyone involved, aren't they? And South America and Africa can beat their drums a lot, but are not in a position to set anything in motion for the foreseeable future.
image de profil
Interesting perspective, I would be happy if that were all and we could now make peace 😁
5
image de profil
@Klein-Anleger So European peace is actually only failing because of the Europeans - the Americans say "A large European majority wants peace, yet that desire is not translated into policy, in large measure because of those governments' subversion of democratic processes"

So the majority of people want peace, but the governments previously described as "unstable minority governments" undermine democratic processes. Whew.
2
image de profil
@Soprano And if the Americans say so, it must be true!
4
image de profil
I wouldn't be sad if Donald kidnapped all the politicians from the Bundestag 😂
5
image de profil
Trump and peace are two oxymorons
3
image de profil
@tom_finance I maintain that Trump himself is an
oxymoron ... without the oxy 😅
5
Thank you for the article. The connections are fascinating. Unfortunately, you won't get much encouragement on this platform. You can imagine why.
3
image de profil
@user5ca946a11b6a4278 Oh, it's fine. GQ is one of the few platforms besides X and in parts Tiktok where people are willing to look beyond their own nose or inform themselves about things that are not part of general knowledge.

There are also a few people here who don't like me at all, but I think they've blocked me anyway.
1
image de profil
World peace would of course be nice, after Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, Venezuela ... I doubt that Trump is planning a change of strategy
2
image de profil
@Aktienfox The change in strategy is already here. Trump has ended the Afghanistan campaign and created facts in Iran and Venezuela without expanding this into an invasion. This is a return somewhere to the Kennedy era, who wanted to avoid open confrontations in Cuba and Vietnam (and West Germany), but was of course anything but a pacifist.
image de profil
denouncing the erosion of democracy and freedom of expression while doing what you want without any checks and balances, disregarding international law, sending the justice department after unwelcome "opponents", invading countries and threatening others... exactly my humor. be careful what you wish for
2
image de profil
Steep thesis but imho unfounded. Basically, it's about America First and continued global dominance. However, the big competitor is China. And in the long term, they will be self-sufficient and technically on a par with the US economy. In some cases, they are even further ahead. In the end, the question is who will win the race. Russia likes to see itself as a great power, but it doesn't play a role economically. India could become the next global player in the game or is on the way to becoming one. A disunited, weak Europe helps everyone else to achieve their goals.
2
image de profil
@market_whizkid_2675 I would actually agree with you on almost all points. I don't understand where you specifically contradict my thesis. The conflict with China is certainly pre-programmed because China is pursuing a similar policy and because they are the only competitor in the world that also wants to (and possibly can) be a leader in future technologies. The question is how the conflict should and will be fought out.
1
image de profil
I understand your first sentence a bit in the direction that peace serves economic dominance and is therefore the goal.

I believe that it is solely about dominance. There is pragmatic action, but peace efforts are only a pretext and even that only as long as it brings a benefit.
image de profil
I had a look around for companies that mine palladium in Canada. Interestingly, there are two South African companies among them. One even has one of the few pure palladium mines in the world.

- $IMP (pure palladium mine).

- $SSW

- $GLEN ✌🏻
1
image de profil
Participez à la conversation