$NVDA (+5.29%)
$PLTR (+1.98%)
$GOOGL (+0.42%)
$AMD (+0.54%)
$AMZN (+0.13%)
$TSLA (+0.12%)
What do you think? Where will these stocks be in 10 years
I am curious
Posts
970$NVDA (+5.29%)
$PLTR (+1.98%)
$GOOGL (+0.42%)
$AMD (+0.54%)
$AMZN (+0.13%)
$TSLA (+0.12%)
What do you think? Where will these stocks be in 10 years
I am curious
It is April 2020, and I am a young and hopeful student who has been studying the theory of financial education for several years and decide to take advantage of the supposedly unique opportunity of the "crash" to finally enter the stock market despite limited capital.
Theoretically, the idea was that it should be easy to get in during a difficult market phase, as all assets should be cheap due to the uncertainty. At least cheaper than they were before. When markets fall, multiples fall too. So even if you don't get everything right or even get a lot wrong, from a purely mathematical point of view you should still be better off than someone who got in in 2018 or 2019. So far, this logic is actually conclusive.
But the pandemic crash was not a normal crash. And I actually find it far too interesting not to talk about it.
In my experience, there is still a lot of talk today about the new markets in 2001 and the real estate bubble in 2008. However, the exciting market phase of the pandemic has hardly been looked back on at all. This may also be due to the fact that we don't feel we can look back at it yet, as we can still feel the effects and have barely really overcome them. However, it is now slowly becoming apparent that a new era has dawned on the market, which is primarily about tariffs, trade deficits and currencies.
But what makes the pandemic a bad time to start?
If you look back at the charts of some securities (and for the sake of clarity, I would like to refer mainly to equities here), you can see several things.
In the case of shares with a gravitas such as $BRK.B (-0.76%) only a tiny corona dent can be seen on the long-term chart. From this you can see that it didn't really matter when you invested. However, the earlier the better. It was important to invest at all, but it was not necessary to wait for a specific point in time. However, this even applies to clear pandemic losers such as $BKNG (+0.98%) and $EVD (+0.19%) .
For some stocks like $AMZN (+0.13%) and $MSFT (+0.07%) the entry point during the actual crash was not ideal. There was an optimal entry point for both stocks recently, but this would not have been apparent until 2-3 years after the crash. Both stocks survived the pandemic almost unscathed, but were then affected by severe secondary factors that put the business under pressure.
Stocks like $TMO (+0.65%) or $AFX (-2.42%) were considered pandemic winners. You could have picked them up at the beginning of the crash ... or you could have left them alone and got them back 5 years later at exactly the same price as before the pandemic started.
And now the worst category: hype stocks. The absolute catastrophe happened to all those who were looking for opportunities where there were actually none. Whether investments in emerging markets or hopes for the future in $ZM (+1.9%) and $FVRR (-0.09%) - Money that was taken out of the broad market ended up largely concentrated in assets that will not reach their ATH for another 20 years. Anyone wanting to be in it for the long term found their Waterloo in the pandemic. Some companies such as $EUZ (-1.45%) or $SRT (-0.45%) may well be doing great things. But here the "crash" was simply the absolute worst entry opportunity of the entire decade.
Correction Edit: I only found a group of stocks that I really needed to buy in the crash and that was Big Oil. There were certainly other stocks that were a bit cheaper at the time. But for the most part, it was not essential to enter at the low point in order to make good returns. That is what made this market phase so difficult. The good stocks were NOT extremely cheap, but there were many bad stocks that were extremely expensive. For newcomers, such a situation is incredibly difficult to navigate.
I closed 2020 with +12% and 2021 with +8% only to get a -22% in 2022. So I didn't make any returns at all in the first 3 years and just paid a lesson.
I thought I would have been smart at least not to have entered in 2018/2019 when all shares were valued much higher on average. But I might have gained experience in these two years so that I would have had more guidance in 2020. Or I could have started in 2022/2023, when there were no more hype stocks and you could pour money into the market with a watering can and it almost always turned into a flower.
I recently saw the portfolio of a friend who restarted his portfolio in 2022. Almost the same portfolio size as mine. However, while I have made 7% p.a. since the start of my portfolio, he has an IZF of 15%. With a portfolio size of 100k, this means that I am sitting on €12,000 book profits and he on €33,000
Backtests are currently showing that my strategy has really put me to sleep and put me to sleep by ALL known and common indices over 5 years. The only consolation here is really the 3-year performance, where it is clear that I can keep up with the major indices and also leave a few big names behind me.
So on a positive note: I'm getting better.
When I‘m screening markets for my investable universe I look for high-quality compounders with:
In detail I’m screening for:
Here are my current holdings:
Today I‘m sharing with you my main portfolio. This doesn’t include any ETF investments and crypto currencies / gold etc. since I want to focus my presence on getquin on stock-picking.
Read my 3-part portfolio strategy posts to get the full picture - here are just the main pillars of what I‘m doing:
I like to divide my holdings into „core holdings“ (forever stocks) and „trend picks“ (2030 stocks) as follows:
Core Holdings (“Forever Stocks”):
Growth Picks (“2030 Stocks”):
I use the 7 Powers framework from the book “7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy” by Hamilton Helmer. It’s a killer framework for understanding why some businesses create lasting value and compound returns over time.
Each “Power” is a sustainable strategic advantage that lets a company generate outsized returns for a long time. I ask the 7 questions for each stock I am considering to buy.
1. Counter-Positioning
2. Scale Economies
3. Switching Costs
4. Network Effects
5. Branding
6. Cornered Resource
7. Process Power
If I had to chose one, Network effects would be the most important one for me.
Here are my current holdings:
Let's relax 🫶 $MSTR (-0.82%)
$3350 (+2.6%)
$AMZN (+0.13%)
$3350 (+2.6%)
Hi! My portfolio plan for this and the comming year is focus on 2 ETFS. $HMWO (-0.15%) and $EIMI (+0.04%) . Further i am planning on dca into $BTC (-0.19%) every month. I also learned a hard lesson and that is not to use build up cash to buy more stocks when sentiment is high. So sadly enough i did not have any cash laying around during the tradewar crash but i managed to rebalance my portfolio to take advantage. For example : i bought $NOVO B (-2.05%) when it was at around 100 euro and bought heavy into the first dip. I sold during the crash and took a loss and reallocated the money to $SMH (+2.41%) and $AMZN (+0.13%) . By making this decision i made some good profit. If you have any tips or critique let me know 😁
What are your three favorite stocks
from a buy and hold perspective?
I am with $MSFT (+0.07%) , $AMZN (+0.13%) and $BRK.B (-0.76%)
We (around 40 people from SW development) trundled into a bar after work last week and wanted to round off the evening in a relaxed atmosphere. Instead of 2 beers, there were of course significantly more and the topic of our operational business was over relatively quickly, in the end of course (once again) we only talked about AI and the discussion hype/sustainability and how each individual can benefit from it (many do without any company insurance, prefer to receive an annual bonus and invest it in the stock market).
In the end (8 beers later) there was relative agreement that it is
a) it is a megatrend with a tailwind (comparable to the internet or smartphones back then)
b) AI will change every industry (and in my opinion very quickly)
c) targeted investments will lead to significant increases in value in 5-10 years.
What has left us all with questions is the impact on the labor market. Entire industries will look completely different in the future; instead of people, there will be robotics and perhaps a handful of people monitoring everything. Where will that lead? Tax systems need to be rethought (loss of jobs = loss of wage tax and social security contributions), the education system needs to be revolutionized and so on. Where are we heading? AI user tax? Digital value-added taxation?
Very exciting with our political leaders and little hope :D
Of course, this is all minimally frightening, but it also offers us all incredible opportunities.
To return to the core issue: I think we all have an opportunity here to build massive wealth. My portfolio is extremely tech-heavy, so I'm still betting on the big players ($NVDA (+5.29%) , $TSM (-0.4%) , $ASML (-0.7%) - entire value chain for chip development), $GOOGL (+0.42%) , $META (+1.2%) . $AMZN (+0.13%) and also a few riskier ones like $PLTR (+1.98%) , $SMCP, $NOW (+0.64%) etc.).
Quantum computing would of course be the next big highlight, but that's another story.
What do you think about it? How will AI shape our generations, what social impact will it have and where are you investing?
LG Max
US and China pause tariffs for 90 days
The USA and China have agreed on a significant de-escalation in the trade conflict: Most tariffs will be suspended for 90 days. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that both sides want to reduce the tariffs. Tariffs on Chinese imports into the USA will fall from the current 145% to 30%, while China's tariffs on US products will be reduced from 125% to 10%. This agreement applies during the upcoming negotiations and President Trump is already planning a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The positive reaction of the US stock markets to this news was unmistakable, as Wall Street was surprised by the extent of the tariff relief. Large technology companies in particular, such as Amazon $AMZN (+0.13%)Apple $AAPL (+0.36%) and Tesla $TSLA (+0.12%) were able to record significant price gains.
Trump announces dismantling of non-monetary trade barriers
In another positive twist, US President Donald Trump has announced that China is willing to remove non-monetary trade barriers to US imports. This could mean that Beijing plans to ease the numerous regulations and export restrictions that make it difficult for foreign investment. In a joint statement, China also announced that it would suspend or terminate the non-tariff countermeasures against the US that have been in place since April. However, these tariff relaxations do not apply to sectoral tariffs, which are applicable to all US trading partners. News of the temporary agreement caused the S&P 500 to rise by over 3%, while defensive assets such as bonds and gold lost value. The dollar also experienced one of its biggest rallies since the November election. The strong share price gains of large technology companies led to the Nasdaq 100 returning to a bull market.
Sources:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-may-speak-xi-140610331.html
Top creators this week