1D·

Hims & Hers

Dear getquiner

I wanted to ask you for advice

the issue is that $HIMS (-0.94%) is currently my biggest position. i don't feel comfortable with that

am currently 200% up with the value

would you consider it sensible to reduce my number of shares to 35, for example?

5
29 Comments

profile image
With the volatility of $HIMS, I would definitely reduce the position a little, especially because you can also take a nice profit!
13
profile image
The thing goes to 200€ before 2030
7
profile image
@spadan21 A zero is missing. 2000€
2
Dude relax 😂
3
profile image
Depending on this, do you think it will stay at this level or rise in the long term, or do you think it is currently overvalued? Taking profits of over 200% is never a bad thing
3
profile image
If you don't feel comfortable with the size, then you should reduce it so that it feels good for you again. If necessary, dissolve it completely to feel comfortable with your depot again.
2
profile image
@Dividenden-Sammler i am convinced of hims for the long term
profile image
At just under 7% I would still be relaxed, but if you feel uncomfortable it's better to take something with you. Just take your stake out 👍🏻
2
profile image
What does largest position mean, according to profile at 6%?
Definitely hold.
If it were now at 20%+ I would have understood a partial sale
1
profile image
@VPT yes that is correct
is my biggest posi :)
1
profile image
@Memo0606 with 6% completely in order
1
profile image
@VPT thanks for your assessment
which values do you currently find attractive?
profile image
@Memo0606 How do you mean which stocks? From your portfolio or in general... what am I currently buying? 👀
profile image
@VPT so i mean which ones would you kick out of my portfolio
and which ones you generally find attractive apart from mine
profile image
I reduced my position last week, as $HIMS had a >30% weighting for me. However, I am convinced in the long term and still see a lot of potential over the next few years.
1
profile image
@Pazzzi For me it's 6% 😅
profile image
@Memo0606 If you don't care about volatility, I would hold, there is no reason to sell. The valuation is not particularly high, there is still potential.
1
profile image
Can I have them at cost price?
1
profile image
I wouldn't do that. It's only 6% of your portfolio, that's perfectly ok. Whether you cut the position to 3% or 4%, does it really make a difference in the end? It's better to "compensate" by simply putting new money into other stocks. I wouldn't sell such an incredibly good performing company, not a single share. Have faith in the compound interest effect and in five years' time you'll probably be glad you didn't sell.
1
profile image
@Leipziger_Jung Or you can sell if you think you have found a better investment. Then I would also sell.
1
profile image
@Leipziger_Jung thanks for your assessment
when you see my dork
where do you see the potential to be thrown out? thank you
profile image
@Memo0606 I have a different investment approach to you. In your case, I see a mix of blue chips and growth stocks, which is probably not a bad thing, although I prefer to be fully invested in small-mid-cap growth stocks because they generally have much higher growth rates. Crazy enough, often at a "cheaper" valuation. So I try to invest according to the Lynch/Greenblatt/Buffet approach:
- lower market cap (because there is still much more potential for growth)
- high earnings yield (= return on equity)
- generally favorable valuation (e.g. due to negative sentiment)
- high return on capital
- preferably high insider ownership
- Management that I trust
profile image
@Leipziger_Jung Not everything on the list always has to be fulfilled, but the more the better
1
profile image
@Leipziger_Jung sounds mega interesting
which small caps or stocks do you still have in your portfolio and find attractive for a first purchase?
profile image
@Memo0606 The ones I have on my watchlist and in my portfolio here on GQ
1
profile image
5% maximum deposit size I would make
profile image
@Tuffbet is now at 6% so it fits :)
profile image
@Tuffbet with me 70%
1
profile image
I think the Zineszins effect only ever exists for you in theory
Join the conversation