LoginSignup
profile image
Dominic
@BregisMoon
3Yr·
2
6 Comments
profile image
RealMichaelScott@RealMichaelScott
3Yr
It may be true that they are valued much more favorably. The question that should always be asked is: why? One answer could be the high debts that weigh on the company. EBIT of about $900 million is offset by net debt of almost $6 billion. On top of that, it is the smallest player in the industrial gas oligopoly. The risks are simply greater than for the other three companies.
•
6
•
Deleted User
3Yr
Comment was deleted
profile image
RealMichaelScott@RealMichaelScott
3Yr
@Boarkeinname Firstly, who else do they want to take over in a market that is virtually controlled by four companies? Secondly, they would probably have to take on new debt and that would not be so advantageous at the current level of debt.
••
View one more answer
profile image
Dominic@BregisMoon
2Yr
Just wanted to say: 72% YtD performance 😜
•
1
•
profile image
Hannes@Hannes_SK
3Yr
Valued much more favorably as they are de facto irrelevant. Even in the Far East, Linde and Air Liquide dominate. The company's only notable achievement was the acquisition of Praxair's production facilities in the merger. 😅
••
profile image
CD@Carpe-Diem
3Yr
.I prefer to think of local or regional big players in the energy sector rather than global ones.
••
Join the conversation
Sign upLogin