1D·

Eli Lilly sinks after double downgrade by HSBC. "We prefer Novo to Lilly at the current share price," adds HSBC.

$LLY (+1.28%)
$NOVO B (+4.53%) Eli Lilly shares fall 1.5% after HSBC downgrades the pharmaceutical company's shares twice from "buy" to "reduce".


Rival Novo Nordisk launches weight-loss drug Wegovy in Thailand, ahead of Lilly's Zepbound. Source: https://de.tradingview.com/news/reuters.com,2025:newsml_L8N3R61LI:0/


It remains exciting, next week there will be new figures from Novo. Novo has already recovered +10% from the low on April 17. Let's see if and how often the support around €51 will be tested🙄

attachment
17
12 Comments

Sebi gets shaky again at HSBC's assessment.
8
profile image
@Lukas98 😀😀 yes yes yes. I'm just saying 7 May, that's when it gets brutal
@Seebi no matter if it goes up or down..I will have to think of you 😂
3
profile image
@Seebi I hope so for your sake, otherwise your world view could collapse 😅
I would buy again strongly, really strongly - if there is a strong dip I will double my position 😁
I hope you can hold out then...
3
profile image
@TomTurboInvest 😀 I am confident that it will be just like the last quarterly figures. Briefly up 4 percent and then permanently down. And you will continue to hope and believe and curse the day you bought more😀
I hope you can withstand the loss
profile image
@Seebi I am also confident, I was at Meta when everyone was just beating on it, I was at Zalando, at Shopapotjeke, etc...😅
Time will tell, May 7th is not relevant🤷🏽‍♂️
I'll get through the interim book loss, it's only a small part of my risk capital.
2
profile image
Tell me, shouldn't the volume peaks from 2022 be offset against inflation? Or are these simply psychologically important lines for people who calculate without inflation?
1
profile image
@Epi regardless of time and inflation, these are the price ranges on the y-axis where there was a lot of trading. Volumes don't lie and have a memory 😅
That's the nice thing for traders😁
At least it looks as if the main volumes of institutional investors keep accumulating at the same level.

The question of inflation is a legitimate one, but I can't answer it from a psychological perspective. But anyone can ask themselves that question.

If you bought a share in 2022 at a price of €100, for example, at what point is it now psychologically at a loss for you? At less than €100 or less than €110 (including inflation)?

Or to put it another way, to track your performance, do you adjust your equity annually in line with inflation?
profile image
@TomTurboInvest The fact that the volume spikes say something can be explained well by behavioral finance, in particular by loss aversion: losses hurt more than profits. This is actually a psychological defect because it encourages irrational behavior. Inflation is probably due to the anchor effect, i.e. the increased price sensitivity in the vicinity of the purchase price.

It's actually totally stupid, but if it works?🤷
1
profile image
@Epi If the general data is correct, then over 95% of volumes come from institutional investors, but even there are people / fund managers behind them who do not want to let their clients' trades run into losses. And these investors have the volume to move prices.
Be that as it may, technically it works, so I continue to orient myself to the volume and volume-weighted average prices.
Maybe I'll write a post about my swing trading, a hobby with little time investment but regular income, and I've been doing it for years 🤷🏽‍♂️
1
profile image
@TomTurboInvest Yes, I would be interested in that too. Especially to optimize my trading around the turn of the month. I think it would be cool! 👌
1
I hope they learn from the US market mistakes and open up other economic areas. Even if the fat cats are there, of course... 🤗
1
Join the conversation