•
11
•
@Multibagger
Well, that's because of the way this ETF replicates. Not physically, but synthetically - and that is why such artifacts occur (in the breakdown into individual positions). The performance is (almost) identical to the index that the ETF tracks.
Regards
🥪
Well, that's because of the way this ETF replicates. Not physically, but synthetically - and that is why such artifacts occur (in the breakdown into individual positions). The performance is (almost) identical to the index that the ETF tracks.
Regards
🥪
•
11
•
@Stullen-Portfolio Thanks Stulle ! @Epi the largest position in Nuholding's
Here the composition of a physically replicating ETF
https://www.justetf.com/de/etf-profile.html?isin=IE00B27YCK28#zusammensetzung
Here the composition of a physically replicating ETF
https://www.justetf.com/de/etf-profile.html?isin=IE00B27YCK28#zusammensetzung
•
11
•@Stullen-Portfolio Thanks for the explanation. I'm glad that I have nothing to do with ETFs. Physical, synthetic, artifacts, that's more complicated than any single stock analysis. 😂😉
•
11
•
For me, with USA >90%, it is also not a classic Latin America, but rather USA + fractions of South America
•
11
•@ZeissJessy see above! This is a synthetic ETF! Cheers!
•
44
•@Multibagger
Nah, it's not that complicated, Chris.
And incidentally, it's pretty irrelevant anyway. Just as irrelevant as the question of whether a company's supervisory board consists of 6, 7 or 8 people 😉
Greetings
🥪
Nah, it's not that complicated, Chris.
And incidentally, it's pretty irrelevant anyway. Just as irrelevant as the question of whether a company's supervisory board consists of 6, 7 or 8 people 😉
Greetings
🥪
•
11
•