2D·

Wave of upgrades, being there is everything

$DFEN (-1.4%)

Hello everyone, over the last few days I have been wondering which company could benefit the most from the enormous investments in armaments. Which company is still reasonably fairly valued and where might it still be worth entering?


However, as I have realized that there is not just one company, the question arises as to whether I should add the whole bouquet to my portfolio.


In my search for the bouquet, I looked for an index. And I came across the


MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index


came across. The MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index provides access to companies worldwide that are active in the military or defense industry.


During my further research, I then came across the


VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A. $DFEN (-1.4%) I came across the VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A.


The VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A is the only ETF that replicates the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index. The ETF replicates the performance of the index through full replication (purchase of all index components). The dividend income in the ETF is accumulated (reinvested in the ETF).


The VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A is a very large ETF with a fund volume of EUR 2,979 million. The ETF was launched in Ireland on March 31, 2023.


Now my question would be to the ETF experts in the community.

What do you think of this ETF?


The TER (total expense ratio) of the ETF is 0.55% p.a. Is it worth these costs, there are also cheaper defense ETFs.


USA 59.33%

France 10.60%

Italy 6.84%

South Korea 4.95%

Israel 4.10%

Singapore 3.22%

Great Britain 3.05

Germany 1.09%

Other countries


The high proportion of US companies could be a disadvantage. However, when I look at the US companies, I see less of a disadvantage.

With 8.53% Palantir, the ETF offers a good opportunity to continue playing the hand and minimize the risk of the high valuation a little.


Palantir Technologies, Inc. 8.53%

Thales SA 8.07%

Booz Allen Hamilton Hldg 7.80%

Leidos Holdings 7.68%

Leonardo SpA 6.84%

Curtiss-Wright 6.78%

BWX Technologies 5.13%

CACI International 4.28%

Elbit Systems 4.10%

SAAB 3.84


The US stocks may even have an advantage now, because they have taken a beating in recent weeks. And should now slowly start to pick up again. As you can already see today

$CACI (+0.48%) and $BAH (+0.74%) recognizable today.


@Memo0606 Perhaps an alternative to Caci!


Furthermore, I still see potential in European stocks. Because Europeans want to pick these companies and it has only just begun.

I also like the fact that through the ETF you can invest in

HANWHA AEROSPA.CO (South Korea)

because unfortunately this is difficult as an individual investment.


Overview of returns

Current year +15.66%

1 month +7.15%

3 months +12.64%

6 months +37.51%

1 year +45.26%

3 years -

5 years -

Since inception (MAX) +117.66%

2024 +52,70%


Please tell me your opinion on my thesis, I look forward to your comments.


https://www.justetf.com/de/etf-profile.html?isin=IE000YYE6WK5

previw image
11
25 Comments

profile image
I'm right there with you. Picking a company can of course be the more profitable way. But you have to find it first. Everyone should be aware that the defense industry will grow extremely in the next 5-7 years. It is not only Germany that has an extreme need to catch up. The French/British also have a lot of catching up to do. But smaller countries such as Estonia/Latvia/Lithuania/Finland will also have to strengthen their troops. I'm just looking at our region. Look further afield. Taiwan, Israel, South Korea. There are trouble spots all over the world and billions of dollars need to be invested
7
profile image
@Hotte1909
Thank you dear, I'm not really a fan of sector ETFs, but in this case I am. The question here is: are there better ETFs?
What I like about the Van Eck is the composition.
profile image
@Tenbagger2024 Personally, there are unfortunately a few stocks missing just as an example $RHM but also those that are indirectly involved such as $RR. In addition, 13% $PLTR there is already a certain risk of clumping
profile image
@Hotte1909
Good point. But maybe Palantir is also the booster
profile image
@Tenbagger2024 Palantir this year +6.6% Rheinmetall +86 rolls royce+36
Personally, a 430 P/E ratio as the largest position would be too risky for me.kuv pala 68 kuv Rheinmetall 6.6
profile image
Or perhaps add two individual stocks to the portfolio and you are also in the mix. But Rheinmetall has already run a bit hot. I like the following individual stocks
$KIT $OHB $AVON $KOG
quite well.
Personally, I am more than critical of the US share, especially as it also includes many consulting companies such as Leidos, CACI and BAH. Even Palantir is still more than attractively valued despite its share price decline. Furthermore, I can well imagine that after all the Trump escapades and the experiences of the past week in Ukraine, Europeans will think more than once about whether they should still buy in the USA. What's the point if I buy a Himars, for example, but it's then shut down remotely if it's directed against targets that don't suit the USA? Or if I have to rely on Maxar to obtain satellite images for reconnaissance purposes and my access is then blocked. Europeans should focus purely on domestic industry and buy from Rheinmetall, Thales, BAE, Dassault, SAAB, Leonardo, RR, Airbus, Diehl Defense, etc. For this reason, I would no longer rely on the Americans or invest in their armaments, but only in European ones.
1
profile image
@Transporter
I can well understand your thinking and it was similar for me. But US stocks have undergone a decent correction and European stocks are now rather expensive again. In the long term, there is no way around the USA. Unfortunately, a purely European defense ETF is still some way off. And some other defense ETFs have an even higher US component. It will therefore be difficult and the alternative would then only be individual stocks.
@Tenbagger2024 When I look at pure defense stocks like RTX or Northrop, I can't see any real correction in these stocks. But if you are referring to stocks like Palantir or CACI, then ok. However, I personally don't count them directly as defense stocks, as they don't produce any physical goods. And in many cases, we no longer have to hide when it comes to armaments. Our tanks such as the Leopard or the Panther, the Skynex, Iris T, the Panzerhaubitze 2000 or RCH 155 are superior to the American ones. The French and the Swedes also have really good equipment. What we lack are missile launchers, capabilities in the air, in cyberspace and in orbit, which need to be built up quickly. We should also see to it that we acquire a large number of drones as quickly as possible. Ukraine shows how important these have become.
profile image
@Transporter
Much of the inner workings of the drones come from $KIT
Also interesting is $KOG.
South Korea is also a major player in the arms industry. Poland also sources a lot from here.
1
@Tenbagger2024 I don't know the values, I'll have a look. That's right, South Korea is also well positioned. As I recall, Poland ordered there because Rheinmetall couldn't deliver so quickly.
1
profile image
As an alternative, I'll throw the IE000OJ5TQP4 Hanetf Future of Defense into the ring. Although the performance is somewhat lower (approx. 41% last year), the ETF is more broadly based with 60 positions, the four largest positions being $RHM $BA. $HO and $SAF. Furthermore, with $PLTR $FTNT $PANW and $CRWD, it also includes some companies that are leaders in the areas of software infrastructure and digital security, areas that are becoming increasingly important for defense.

But no matter which one you choose, I think both have a good chance of making a good return over the next few years (unfortunately).
6
profile image
@SteelAnacott
Thanks, I had already discovered that too. I like the Van Eck because it shows the index.
1
profile image
Cool article! 😎
I noticed that I already had the ETF in my watchlist, but had forgotten about it a bit and paid it little attention 😅
Your article could change that, but I'm of the same opinion as @Hotte1909 - the $PLTR percentage in the ETF also made me swallow at first, after all it was one of the hype stocks in 2024.

On the other hand, as you have already described, the US sector has already taken a beating anyway, which is why I think that an investment here would definitely make sense in the long term despite the USA - it's just hard to get around our "Freedom Island" on the stock market, especially with ETFs etc.

I'll definitely give it some thought 😄
3
profile image
@batic420
It was already too risky for me to invest in Palantir last year, so I was able to sit on the sidelines. However, the ETF offers an opportunity to be involved and still be able to sleep a little more soundly.
1
profile image
The 13.6% $PLTR is still holding me back, but basically a TOP suggestion to deal with the armaments issue without taking too much risk when investing.
2
profile image
The ETF is certainly a good solution for those who do not want to engage in stock picking, but would like greater exposure to the defense sector.

I see the US share as unproblematic in the long term.
Historically, it is extremely unlikely that there will be really significant budget cuts in the US defense sector.
In addition, US stocks will continue to benefit from a global need to rearm.
I am invested 1/3 in EU and 2/3 in US defense.

Thanks for sharing my article! 🙏
1
profile image
profile image
@BigMo
Thank you also for your contribution
profile image
Great share, thank you!
1
profile image
great contribution
profile image
@Memo0606
Thank you my friend
Have both (VanEck & HanETF) and can't complain 😁
I would also like a pure Europe Defense ETF, I see there is a lot of demand, hopefully they respond soon.
I would also invest in the South Korean defense industry (e.g. Hanwha Group), but it is not traded in Europe.
profile image
@market_expert_1185
However, European defense stocks have already had a good run and a correction should be expected here
Join the conversation