1D·

US announces crackdown on compounded weight loss drugs; Hims shares slump

$NOVO B (+10.5%)
$HIMS (-6.34%)

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Friday it would take action against telemedicine provider Hims & Hers over its $49 weight-loss pill. This would include restricting access to the drug's active ingredients and referring the company to the Department of Justice for possible violations of federal laws.

A federal crackdown to limit the manufacture of compounded drugs would be a win for Novo Nordisk, which is losing market share in the weight-loss drug market to rival Eli Lilly and telemedicine providers such as Hims. However, the FDA did not make it clear whether it could stop sales of the Hims product, the cheapest GLP-1 therapy on the US market, in the short term.


Shares of Hims fell 14.1% in after-hours trading.


The FDA announced it would restrict the use of GLP-1 agents in unapproved compounded drugs that companies like Hims and other pharmacies market as alternatives to approved treatments. The agency cited concerns about quality, safety and possible violations of federal law.


On Thursday, Reuters first reported that Hims would offer copies of Novo Nordisk's new Wegovy pill at an introductory price of $49 a month, about $100 less than the original product.


Novo Nordisk then announced it would take legal action against the telemedicine company over its plan to sell compounded copies of the drug.


The General Counsel of the US Department of Health and Human Services, Mike Stuart, also announced on Friday that he had referred Hims & Hers to the Department of Justice for possible violations.


Hims said in a statement that the company had "always acted with a strong commitment to the safety and well-being of consumers and in accordance with applicable law."


"We have a long history of successful collaboration with regulators and look forward to continuing to work with the FDA to ensure safe access to affordable health care."


Novo Nordisk spokeswoman Liz Skrbkova said in a statement: "We welcome today's actions by HHS and FDA to protect patients from unapproved copycat drugs made with foreign, inauthentic active pharmaceutical ingredients that can pose significant risks to patient safety."


A Lilly spokesperson said the company welcomes the FDA's action. "For years, compounders have put patients at risk by unlawfully manufacturing and selling copycat drugs on a large scale with inferior ingredients from illegal foreign suppliers, with no clinical evidence of their safety or efficacy. Patients deserve better, and we look forward to decisive action from FDA, other regulators and law enforcement."


ENFORCEMENT OPTIONS


Compounding, in which pharmacies mix active ingredients for specific drugs or recreate a drug in other dosages, has gained prominence in the U.S. as Americans seek less expensive drugs.


This practice is legal under certain circumstances under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, such as when prescribed by a physician to treat a patient's side effects or in the event of a drug shortage.


Hims' compounded drug is not FDA-approved and has not undergone clinical trials for efficacy.


FDA enforcement actions against Hims could include sending a warning letter, seeking a court injunction or administrative seizure of products, according to Joanne Hawana, a member at Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.


The agency needs the support of the Department of Justice to enforce an injunction because it lacks independent standing to sue, Hawana said.


According to Hawana, the FDA's statements indicate that "this announcement by Hims is so worrisome to the government that they have decided to escalate the matter."


TAKING ACTION AGAINST ADVERTISING


To date, FDA action on weight loss drugs has been limited to warning letters sent in the fall of 2025 to combat misleading direct-to-consumer advertising and marketing.


Commissioner Marty Makary stated on Friday that the agency will "use all available compliance and enforcement resources within its jurisdiction to address unsubstantiated claims and related public health concerns."


The regulator emphasized that companies may not claim in promotional materials that non-FDA-approved compounded products are generic or identical to FDA-approved drugs.


It added that "they also may not state that compounded drugs contain the same active ingredient as FDA-approved drugs or that compounded drugs have been clinically proven to achieve results in patients."

20
16 Comments

profile image
$HIMS has been falling for almost a year, there's no need for this FDA 😩
7
profile image
Novonordisk 🚀🚀🚀
3
profile image
I have a nice story about how I fell flat on my face while trading with $HIMS.
On Thursday, I noticed that $HIMS wanted to launch a $49 pill. The price had already risen and I waited patiently for a setback and then bought it with a 2.5 leverage. It then went well into positive territory and I then decided not to set a stop, as I assumed that it would continue to go up after such an announcement. So I got on with other things in life. Then a few hours later I looked at my portfolio and was naturally surprised to see what was going on. I quickly read that $NOVO B wants to sue. Ok, I thought to myself. I continued to wait (that was the mistake).
Then on Friday the temporary turnaround. $HIMS rose sharply and I was optimistic that it would continue like this on Monday.
But now this news will probably knock out my derivative or I will sell it in the morning.
Conclusion: I had a lot of bad luck and almost got off lightly by "hoping"... But "hoping" will ultimately lead to a painful loss.
Fortunately, I always work with small stakes in derivatives.
But I have to be honest, for the effort I put into trading, I don't get anything out of it.
With this in mind.
Best regards 💥🗡️
3
profile image
If what the FDA wrote is true, then I would have lost all trust in Hims' management (which I never had anyway). It's like sitting in a bathtub on the roof of a house during a thunderstorm, blow-drying yourself with one hand and poking a fork into a socket with the other, and then wondering why it's sizzling.
2
profile image
1
profile image
@HoldTheMike Perhaps you should think about swapping the Tenbagger depot. Even if the majority were against it in the last vote.
1
profile image
@Multibagger I'm with you on that. I'll give this some thought.
2
profile image
@Multibagger I took a closer look at $OMDA over the last few days (also because they have given up so much for no apparent reason). JP Morgan has once again described the GLP1 issue in the USA in great detail. There is a need for education and personal support on the subject and with prices continuing to fall, there should be even more tailwind for $OMDA. WITH even more customers + profitability in 26, this could become a really good investment at the market cap. They are trading at 2 times sales and still have over $100m cash with positive FCF in 26, so EV is now even cheaper. What do you think? YTD also fell a lot and didn't even take the recovery on Friday...
1
profile image
@Michey777 I'm sticking with it. And I think I'll buy more when I get the chance.
1
1
profile image
For once a company that was rightly removed from my portfolio due to a lack of returns.
1
profile image
The Americans really do everything to protect their capitalism in its final stage :D
1
profile image
I still remember a few principles from my time at a Swiss pharmaceutical company. One of them: "Never fuck with the FDA!"
1
profile image
Did they say that HIMS was reseling a drug without FDA approval? Fuuuhahaha it is more than ban of the pill, doesnt it breach some regulatory obligation for the company on the stockmarket???
profile image
Hims deserve bankruptcy
Join the conversation