3Yr·

An attempt to stop the stock split posts


Since the Nvidia split and especially lately with the announcement of Alphabet, Amazon and Tesla the "Stock split - should I buy?" Posts multiply, a small post about it. For those who don't need this post - just read through the fun fact.


Short version: it's only a visual change. Nothing changes in the stock or the valuation. Comparable to when you go to the hairdresser - you change optically but remain the same person. You may get a little personality boost because you feel more comfortable. The equivalent of this is that the visually more favorable price often gives the stock a price boost. You can find out why in the text.


What is a stock split?


"With a stock split, the current stock of an AG is divided into a larger number of shares. This makes them visually more favorable. For the shareholder, nothing changes in his share in the AG, since his capital share is merely distributed over a larger number of shares after the split." [1]


Why is there a stock split every now and then?


For one thing, a company can increase the number of shares on the market without issuing new/more share certificates, since after the split, for example, 20 shares correspond to the value of one share before the split. Secondly, to make the share itself more attractive to private investors. Many are reluctant to buy only fractions of a share and thus do not have the opportunity to own a share that costs several 1000€. If they should do this nevertheless, they have partially a high cluster risk. If the price is (visually) lowered, many investors feel more comfortable with the stock in their portfolio. A possible reason why the price often gets a boost after a split - many private investors buy (after). This in turn is the reason why a stock split is very positively received on the stock market. Nothing really changes but everyone hopes for rising prices. See Tesla announcements a few days ago (+8% I think) [2].


It is also often mentioned that stock splits are a "signal of strength" for companies. Stock splits only make sense at an elevated price - means the company is signaling to the market "look our stock price was doing so well we need a stock split again to stay attractive." [3]


In my opinion, an important addition to @JohannesJaehn (should not be lost in the comments): "One might add, however, that a split is how a company achieves the requirements to be included in an index. This is particularly the case with Alphabet and Amazon, as they have never been able to be included in the Dow weighted by stock price due to their high price. However, the stock split means that they can now be included:


https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/09/amazon-split-could-set-it-up-for-being-included-in-the-dow-industrials.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/01/alphabet-stock-split-paves-way-for-addition-to-dow.html"


Disadvantages?


No disadvantages arise from the stock split because, as mentioned, nothing changes. The only disadvantages arise from the ignorance of a private investor. For example:


- Bottle conclusions due to the preliminary price drop on the day of the split.

- Visually cheaper price and therefore the danger of not recognizing an overvaluation [3].


Funfact


In case of a split, your share in the depot is not split, but withdrawn and replaced by new shares. In this way you receive X new shares. This is one of the reasons why in times of physical shares stock splits were rather rare. The effort to collect all shares and issue new ones was much too high. Due to the technical implementation, this is no longer a problem nowadays, as no action is required on our part. [3]


Conclusion


A stock split alone should never be the reason to buy, as the only change is purely visual. Of course, one can bet on the rising prices after a split. However, one should at least be aware that a stock split alone is not a promise of rising prices. An Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet or Tesla deliver super numbers in recent years and are accordingly very popular in the market - popular = rising prices. Should anyway cheap, unpopular or strong dividend stocks do a stock split, it would very likely not cause such a price jump. Provided the dividend is also adjusted of course. You should also check your orders before/after the split. Often these are deleted and have to be reset. However, there are probably also cases where the order is adjusted but also cases where the order was simply executed due to the adjusted price.


End of the song - as a smart man said one thing: "Everything remains as it is!!!".


PS: please do not post the 2000th Tesla beef in the comments just because the words "Tesla", "price" and "cheap" are mentioned here, thank you.


[1] https://boersenlexikon.faz.net/definition/aktiensplit/#:~:text=Mit%20einem%20Aktiensplit%20wird%20der,gr%C3%B6%C3%9Fere%20Anzahl%20von%20Aktien%20verteilt.

[2] https://www.wiwo.de/finanzen/geldanlage/tesla-aktiensplit-2022-das-muessen-anleger-jetzt-ueber-den-split-beim-e-autobauer-wissen/28209108.html

[3] https://www.deltavalue.de/aktiensplit/

attachment
47
45 Comments

profile image
Instructions inaccurate, have now made a hair appointment ☺️
15
profile image
@Lorena cool let's make you an ombré ombré
profile image
@SharkAce first time only cut but maybe in the aftermath highlights 🌝
profile image
@Lorena what color?👀 see you already at turquoise
1
profile image
@SharkAce blond 🌝 there I see me rather less you
1
profile image
@Lorena so that your hair also fits your intellect HA 🌚🌝
profile image
@SharkAce HA 🦍
1
profile image
@SharkAce I feel blonde offended :o
profile image
@RoronoaZoro I thought eigl under the cap expect me green hair....
profile image
@SharkAce Nene, with me there is only rich, full blond 😂
1
profile image
@Lorena that's how you can understand Split, of course.
1
profile image
4
profile image
But what if my hairdresser fucks up, I get depressed, isolate myself and buy a 300 Tesla long
2
profile image
@getquin then according to 50% of GQ tomorrow you are a millionaire and according to the other 50% you are stupid and broke. either way the fucked up hairstyle remains 😂
4
profile image
Very good Mr. Hai @ccf It is also quite interesting that since 1980 stocks that have made splits make on average 25% in one year https://www.marketwatch.com/story/stock-splits-can-be-profitable-for-investors-here-are-five-companies-that-might-perform-well-if-they-split-their-shares-11648658716
2
profile image
@KapriolenSonne It's interesting what pure optics can do. Even in the oh so "feeling-free" stock exchange 😂 With derivatives it also makes a difference but I think (hope) you don't have to explain this to people who trade in derivatives 😵‍💫
profile image
@SharkAce Yes the WSB Apes should buy nice option chains 🤤
1
profile image
Strong post 👍
1
profile image
Good post: However, one could add that a company reaches the requirements to be included in an index through a split. This is particularly the case with Alphabet and Amazon, as they have never been able to be included in the Dow weighted by share price due to their high share price. However, the stock split means that they can now be included: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/09/amazon-split-could-set-it-up-for-being-included-in-the-dow-industrials.html https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/01/alphabet-stock-split-paves-way-for-addition-to-dow.html
1
profile image
@JohannesJaehn right the topic we had already times! Could you pin comments above I would do :D Edit: so are now in my post my best
profile image
@JohannesJaehn Dow is also completely meaningless...
profile image
@svenleowe can be seen either way. In the end, if it comes to pass, there will also be another decent jump in the share price.
profile image
@SharkAce Tesla im Dow 👀
1
profile image
@svenleowe Tesla probably announces another split right after the split haha
1
profile image
@SharkAce free money 🧠💸
1
profile image
With the words "Tesla", "course" and "cheap" I have no problem 🤓
1
profile image
Why am I just seeing this now?@ccf
1
profile image
@Europoor because the algorithm wants to separate us...
1
profile image
@SharkAce evil algorithm :(
1
profile image
@Europoor are too blatant in duo 🥺
1
profile image
Interesting would actually be if you do not set a savings plan to a fixed amount but set as a savings plan "monthly 2 shares" buy. Whether the respective broker then simply executes 2 shares at a much lower value or deletes the position from the savings plan and requests a new investment. Since the individual providers can behave quite differently
1
profile image
@Amok correctly on the Internet you can find various stories about what went wrong with the orders during the split. Whether it is true, it is difficult to control.
Deleted User
3Yr
Comment was deleted
profile image
@MelonUsk97 it says 😂

But yes. But to be honest, I don't understand the aversion to fractional shares on the market. For example, I also have 0.X shares in Amazon and see absolutely no problem with that 😅
3
profile image
@SharkAce I do. My inner Monk doesn't like the Apple part, it looks so messy on me :/
4
profile image
@Lorena then just don't look at your BTC/ ETH shares 👀
profile image
@SharkAce will be built up until I own a Bitcoin 😈
2
profile image
@MelonUsk97 Why do some investors not want to have any fragments in their portfolio? After all, they have their value and you can sell them too?
1
profile image
@He-One would attribute it to the psychology of the individual. Some people always have to pay straight at the volume.
3
profile image
@He-Man as @DiFigiANo says. For peace of mind. I just like it better visually 🙃
2
profile image
@Lorena ok. So be it.
For your peace of mind 👌🏻
2
profile image
Now GME has also announced a stock split...?!
April Fool's Day?
1
profile image
@Lorena haha ... I have the same Monk too ... and that's if the number of shares isn't 10 or 5 ... 🧐 So 8 is doo, then 10 is better ... although that's difficult with the expensive shares 🤪
2
View one more answer
Join the conversation