4D·

Bitcoin Treasuries at a Glance

Last year, all Bitcoin Treasuries took a massive hit, and my short-term bet on Metaplanet $3350 (-0.22%) didn’t pan out. To be honest, I didn’t like the way the international stock offering was handled at all, and what recently came to light regarding executive compensation and transparency in communication could have put the final nail in the coffin.

Metaplanet also failed to benefit from the latest Bitcoin $BTC (+0.86%) rebound, while competitors like Strive $ASST (+0.68%) are clearly better positioned for the moment, and this is directly reflected in their mNAV and, consequently, their stock price. Even the giant Strategy $MSTR (-0.93%) managed to outperform.


However, I believe that’s precisely where the opportunity lies right now. Contrary to my short-term speculation, my long-term thesis regarding the Treasuries—and Metaplanet in particular—remains completely intact.


Through the acquisition of the U.S. subsidiary in SuperLeague $SLE and the confirmation of the first preferred shares—which are set to be issued in October and will be tradable privately in Japan first and then publicly in the U.S. by the end of Q4—Metaplanet is now presenting the market with a first plausible basis for no longer underperforming in the future.


I believe that the recent FUD surrounding management is still weighing on the stock price and see this as an opportunity to continue accumulating shares, as I have been doing since August. In my opinion, over a 10-year period or longer—with a portion of the portfolio diversified globally across leading BTC treasuries—it’s possible to achieve a massive excess return relative to the broader market and a moderate excess return relative to spot BTC. It’s something worth looking into at least once.

And hey, maybe something will even come of the German $WDL1 (+17.52%) turn out to be something.😅 But even I’m watching that one from the sidelines.


$SWC
$ALTBG (+1.86%)

11.08
Metaplanet logo
Bought x2000 at €1.234
€2,467.60
10
14 Comments

profile image
Why make it so complicated? Just use BTC and that's it. 🤷
•
18
•
profile image
@Epi I agree. That way, you also avoid having the poor governance at $3350 in your portfolio.
•
2
•
profile image
@Epi Right now, it’s quite simple in terms of the excess return I expect. But starting in 2027, Treasuries could also become more attractive from a tax perspective. And why don’t I just buy leveraged BTC? Because I don’t like the path- and time-dependence—I’m too sporadic in my monitoring of the price for that.
•
1
•
profile image
@mitpommes Don't French fry stands also buy BTC on credit? That would give you normal leverage, including time-dependent factors.
••
profile image
@Epi The market is now penalizing all Treasuries that still buy BTC on credit in the traditional way. Strive $ASST, for example, has €0 in debt; all BTC purchases come primarily from sales of preferred shares and secondarily from share issuances when mNAV >1. Strive is never required to repay the capital from the preferred shares. They have only stated that they will pay a variable dividend—currently 13%—in perpetuity. Naturally, this immediately sets off alarm bells within the traditional financial framework, but the difference is that BTC forms the underlying asset. Whether management is managing the risk of the underlying asset, BTC, reasonably is what you’re banking on. Based on the current dividend yield, the expectation is that BTC will, for the time being (as long as the dividend remains at 13%), perform significantly better than 13% per annum.
The preferred shares on the horizon are precisely why Metaplanet might soon have a reason to rebound.
•
3
•
profile image
@Epi Treasuries are essentially similar to leverage on BTC. Currently, Metaplanet’s enterprise value to BTC NAV ratio stands at 0.85. At its peak, however, it has reached as high as 7. With Spot, you receive the BTC you purchased as a one-time payment. With Treasuries, you sometimes get more BTC and a higher valuation. However, the reverse is also true.
•
1
•
profile image
@burnheart Sure. But if I want leverage on BTC, I might as well just buy a BTC leveraged certificate. At least that way, I don't have any management risk. 🤷
•
1
•
profile image
@Epi There is, after all, a difference compared to leverage: if you fundamentally believe in a bull market but the price drops again beforehand, leverage can sometimes knock you out hard, whereas the treasury doesn’t go bankrupt as quickly. In a bull market, the Treasury can also develop its own momentum and leverage—BTC rises, the mNAV grows -> this creates further financing opportunities to accumulate new BTC, and so on. Even during sideways phases, the Treasury can have advantages. But of course, leverage is transparent and easy to calculate. With Treasury, it’s getting harder and harder to assess everything. And crypto is already volatile enough as it is. But as an alternative, you can also use leverage on the Treasury :-)))
•
1
•
profile image
•
3
•
profile image
Probably a good time to buy 👍🏻
•
1
•
But then why not $ASST?
•
1
•
profile image
@Sebbster They're in the mix, too—I picked them up in August for €9. :) But right now, based on BTC per share, they're more than twice as expensive as Metaplanet.
•
1
•
@mitpommes Nice start :) Good luck. I'm still down a good 25% on Metaplanet. But maybe I'll buy some more then. Your post is motivating, haha. If Bitcoin hits a new all-time high again someday, people will regret not having bought more now.
•
1
•
I think that's bold, too—I'm down 70% on a 250-euro investment, but I'm just holding on so I don't realize the loss.
•
1
•
Join the conversation