1Yr
And I thought I was alone in my opinion, but the article is 100% accurate in my view of dividends. I'm still quite new here myself, but I've noticed that a lot of portfolios have $O. I've always wondered why people do that. I have always wondered why people do this. Monthly recurring dividends, which I then have to reinvest constantly, make no sense if I do not currently need the cash flow. If I do not reinvest the monthly return, then these are real yield killers. I am already 47 myself, but I would put the stock in my portfolio in 10-15 years at the earliest.
Another small thought/addition to the otherwise perfect contribution. An investment in shares that are known for returning capital to investors through regular share buybacks can be a great lever, since this does not have a negative tax impact until the sale. Especially in the US, this is very popular.@ccf
Another small thought/addition to the otherwise perfect contribution. An investment in shares that are known for returning capital to investors through regular share buybacks can be a great lever, since this does not have a negative tax impact until the sale. Especially in the US, this is very popular.@ccf
•
33
•
@zenz69 thanks for the comment 🙃jap exactly because the question has also driven me around, why people constantly strive for higher cash flows and are under 30, had to times such a contribution here, which changes times the perspective and explains a few connections 😊
•
11
•
@zenz69 Have you ever seen the company's returns over the last 10 years? You're just assuming that people are buying the company for some flimsy reason. A real investor only looks at the returns, and they've been top.
•
11
•