@Epi For comparisons, I have given the TTWOR for each portfolio so that it can be compared with indices.
There are countless publications on the thesis with vast amounts of data. Even Warren Buffet has often discussed the Monkey Test.
Here is also a link to it https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2012/12/20/any-monkey-can-beat-the-market/
The core statement, which is also statistically verifiable: Any portfolio of 30 stocks randomly selected from the list of 1,000 stocks is bound to include mostly smaller companies. Since small companies outperformed big companies, this is how Malkiel's monkey portfolio beats the market.
In the end, as always, it is a risk/reward ratio. The broad market is less risky, but costs some performance.
Since I don't choose my stocks at random, my portfolios don't actually meet the Monkey Test, but they still show that you can perform well with a small selection.
There are countless publications on the thesis with vast amounts of data. Even Warren Buffet has often discussed the Monkey Test.
Here is also a link to it https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2012/12/20/any-monkey-can-beat-the-market/
The core statement, which is also statistically verifiable: Any portfolio of 30 stocks randomly selected from the list of 1,000 stocks is bound to include mostly smaller companies. Since small companies outperformed big companies, this is how Malkiel's monkey portfolio beats the market.
In the end, as always, it is a risk/reward ratio. The broad market is less risky, but costs some performance.
Since I don't choose my stocks at random, my portfolios don't actually meet the Monkey Test, but they still show that you can perform well with a small selection.
•
11
•