You won't get far here with a portfolio like that. We are mostly investors and your portfolio is simply a big gamble. The way you write is also extremely unsympathetic and preachy, which is why nobody wants to discuss it with you.
•
3535
•2Mon
@Ayecaramba256 Hi how do I write. In my opinion I respond to comments very nicely, not like others have responded to me in the past. Yes my manner may also come from the fact that I have not received any argument against my strategy or even a good and informative discussion. Also, I should be listened to (no hate). I have explained my strategy and where is that gambling please? Just as you trust in FIAT, I trust in crypto, especially BTC. Am I not allowed to do that? Or maybe no one has an argument because no one responds to me, but writes a negative comment against me, but has no arguments and thus deprives me of the right to explain.
••
@Pauljj Well, as Turboinvest wrote. You think you're the greatest ever because you started right at the beginning of the bull market. But your way of investing is speculation. We are all interested in long-term wealth accumulation here. And as you write in your initial post. You convinced someone who criticized you --> that shows that you don't respect other opinions but try to impose yours. Some would call it resistant to advice.
•
44
•2Mon
@Ayecaramba256 Oh wow ok. Good to know that you see it that way. I didn't realize it myself. Then of course I'm sorry, even if I don't know what's so bad about convincing someone. I'm very interested in the long term, with BTC and other projects. Just in a different way to you. Can't I? And if I came across as a bit strange, then I'm sorry, but it's cool that you're so open with me. But I still don't have an argument for "gambling"?
••
@Pauljj If you want "criticism" and opinions on your portfolio, but you write that you convinced the only critic at the last roast, that only speaks for the fact that you are 100% convinced of your portfolio and don't want to accept any other opinions. I get the impression that you just wanted to post your portfolio so that other people could tell you how great your performance is. However, we are here for constructive exchange and therefore cannot do anything with such portfolios and especially with the text about them and what it shows
•
11
•@Pauljj Gambling is perhaps the wrong word. At the moment, you are investing a lot in assets that may or may not be worth a lot at some point. The use case is not necessarily there yet and it will take some time. That's why, compared to profitable companies with a long history, it's less of an investment and more of a speculation on a new world. It can go well, but it can also go wrong. That's why I wouldn't bet everything on it if I were you, but only a certain proportion in your portfolio and that should be less than 30% (at least in the investment)
••
@Ayecaramba256 I'm also 100% up with crypto and you could then say mine. It's great why I don't put everything into crypto. But that would be far too risky for me, so I don't want crypto to make up more than 10% of my portfolio in the long term. Unfortunately, due to the good performance, the value is currently at 22%
•
11
•2Mon
@Ayecaramba256 Btw, I wrote "hopefully" and he hasn't answered me yet? Shall we talk about what convinced means?
••
2Mon
@Ayecaramba256 @Ayecaramba256 Ok wow enough already😂. I don't know what you have against me all the time. My goal is to convince. But nobody has any arguments, unfortunately. I would be very excited about exciting discussions, which unfortunately I rarely get. Maybe that will change. But I reject your accusations. Greetings
•
22
•@Pauljj I don't really care if you reject them. With every further post you only confirm them ;)
•
11
•2Mon
@Pauljj Ok wow you're really only convinced of cryptos and I have to agree with Ayecaramba, you come across as very arrogant at times. The fact is, there is currently no use case for cryptos other than money laundering. Of course, this may change at some point and you may be able to buy other things with it in the future. But how long until that happens and do you think that everyone will then use Btc etc. or prefer to stick with the old money? I don't even see the inflation proof argument, economists say that a base inflation of ~2% a year is better than none or deflation, but that also has a very complicated explanation that would be too long here, so I don't see why inflation would be completely dead after the introduction of Btc, in the days of the gold standard there was also inflation, it was just harder to control. But let's say it really does happen and everyone uses Btc, that doesn't make my shares in Apple worth less, there is still something material behind it that produces goods for people, I would just be able to sell the shares for bitcoin instead of eurons. So in that sense it's gambling, you're betting that the value of Btc will be higher in the future than it is today, without having a practical use case in the here and now, you're speculating that it will be different in the future. And only the crystal ball can tell us that
•
22
•