Why $ATOM and not $DOT or $QNT when it comes to interoperability of blockchains? I see the Overledger from Quant as superior in the medium term, because with all blockchains unlimited compatibility while Cosmos the blockchain must already be built on the Cosmos SDK. No fun no idea I'm still looking for a suitable investment case and crypto value for me to gamble and I'm focused on $QNT. There I met Cosmos only also 😉 but I would still be interested why Cosmos
••
@Fabzy because higher marketcap Hope I🥴
•
11
•
@Fabzy Atom > QNT
••
@TradingMelone tell that to the chart
•
11
•@leveragegrinding Wait a minute😄
•
11
•@TradingMelone I do, you can see the position in my profile
••
@TradingMelone ok, why? Both solve a similar problem just in different ways for different audiences in my opinion. Quant is aimed more at companies that have already built their blockchains and connects everyone together. I find MultiChainApps super exciting. Cosmos is aimed more at developers who want to build their blockchains with Cosmos. With Quant, I find the bridge to the current world (as it sounds) and Blockchains interesting and see as a solution for all cases, while Cosmos will only ever play in its yes Cosmos. I'm grateful for any other perspective on it, so knock yourself out ;)
••
@Fabzy Cosmos connects blockchains and bridges are as we all know - dirty - also I know many big projects, funds and banks find Cosmos interesting. Developer Activity is high, nice Price Action, everything in Cosmos is very user friendly and easy for the end consumer. BNB is based on Cosmos and also other projects like DYDX or similar are migrating.
•
11
•@TradingMelone ok, yes NBB is a flagship. But what would you criticize about QNT that you say ATOM > QNT?
••
@Fabzy I meant above with the market cap: by the less large admittingness of QNT there is also less interest from all sides, which is first a disadvantage. See completely stupid comparison: BTC has ultra many quirks. But because it is the best known in its field, everyone buys it.
••
@Fabzy QNT has similar sectarian traits for me similar to XRP. That is for me nen blatant ab turn. In addition, I limit myself to very few projects and think little of diversify in Crypto. Here rather quality instead of quantity and there hass with me now times Atom reingeschafft. In addition, I hardly researche new projects meanwhile. I invest in my big players and swing trade the rest. Would like to say that QNT can be quite crass have a few good contacts who are also big in there - I just do not feel so 100 percent.
•
11
•