4Mon·

$BTC The perfect "store of value"?

⚠️Disclaimer: The argumentation in this article is largely based on the book "Golden Future" by Florian Bruce-Boye. I found this perspective on Bitcoin too good not to share with you. If you are looking for a good book on Bitcoin that is suitable for both beginners and advanced users, I can absolutely recommend this book.


In this article, I will introduce you to 16 characteristics that a perfect store of value should have, according to the author Florian. I will then show you why Bitcoin (and only Bitcoin) fulfills all these characteristics and thus represents a paradigm shift in terms of store of value.


One more note before we start with the properties: "The value should be stable" is not a property, but results from the properties of an asset.


Properties of a perfect store of value and why Bitcoin fulfills all of them


(1) No inflation possible

Inflation, in whatever form, would dilute your share of the store of value. The ideal store of value is truly and definitely limited. Even gold is not ideal in this respect, as it inflates at just under 2% per year. If you own 10% of all gold today, in 36 years you will only own 5% of all gold.


-> Bitcoin is limited to 21 million units - forever. This means that no institution, no state and no individual will be able to "print" more Bitcoin or put it into circulation.


(2) Infinitely divisible

For scarce goods in particular, it is important that they are sufficiently divisible. This ensures that people with limited assets can also benefit from the store of value. At the same time, it is also advantageous if parts of the stored value can be used, sold or sent in any amount.


-> One Bitcoin can be divided into 100 million parts (satoshis). In 2nd layer technologies such as Lightning even further. In case anyone is now wondering whether Bitcoin is therefore not absolutely scarce - if you cut a cake into an infinite number of pieces, it will still not become more.


(3) Liquidity

It should be possible to buy or sell the store of value at any time. Real estate is expensive and shares can only be sold at certain times on certain days.


-> Bitcoin can be traded anytime and anywhere. There is no market that is closed, no office hours or public holidays.


(4) Transportable

My store of value should be transportable so that I can move it with me from A to B without any problems. In the case of real estate, the lack of transportability is already included in the name. This makes it vulnerable to the forces of nature, wars, taxes and expropriation.


-> There is no easier way to transfer value than Bitcoin. All you need is the private key. You could theoretically transport billions of euros in Bitcoin in your head by simply memorizing your private key. Unlike gold or real estate, Bitcoin is unbeatable in this respect - completely independent of space and time.


(5) Transportable

The perfect store of value should be movable over spatial distances independently of me. I want to have the freedom to send any part of my stored value around the world. For example, I cannot easily send shares, gold and real estate from A to B.


-> With Bitcoin, you can send a value from A to B, no matter where A and B are located. Bitcoin is global and borderless.


(6) No "cost of carry"

The ideal store of value should cost nothing, regardless of whether I have 10 or 10 billion euros stored in it. A real estate portfolio worth 10 billion euros is associated with considerable ongoing costs.


-> It doesn't matter whether it's 10 or 10 billion euros - the storage costs only differ very slightly.


(7) No possibility of access by third parties

The ideal store of value should be 100% in my possession. This means, among other things, that no third party can take my store of value away from me, whether friend or foe, state or mafia.


-> With Bitcoin, you are your own bank. Nobody can access your Bitcoin as long as you keep your private key safe. There is no third party who could have access to your assets, be it a state, a bank or another institution.


(8) No entity has control over the store of value

In the ideal store of value, there is no entity that can exercise control over the store of value. There should be neither a CEO who can make decisions nor a state that can print units of my store of value at will. Ideally, all properties are secured without having to be guaranteed by an authority.


-> Bitcoin is decentralized. There is no central authority that could control or influence Bitcoin. Neither a CEO nor a government has the power to make changes to the network or influence the money supply. This makes Bitcoin independent of political and economic interventions that often threaten other stores of value.


(9) Available everywhere

The ideal store of value should not only be accessible to me at all times, but also everywhere.


-> Bitcoin is accessible everywhere as long as you have an internet connection (which is no longer even necessary!). No matter whether you are in New York, Tokyo or a small village without banks - Bitcoin is available to everyone in the world.


(10) Permanent

The ideal store of value is infinitely durable and indestructible. Its half-life is unlimited.


-> Bitcoin cannot decay, rust or be destroyed. There is no physical unit that could be damaged by time or external influences. As long as the network is running and the private key exists, your Bitcoin remains secure and valid forever.


(11) Verifiable

Anyone should be able to quickly verify whether a unit of the store of value is real. If I were to give you 1g of gold right now, you couldn't be sure whether it was real or whether it was actually 1g of tungsten coated with gold.


-> Anyone can easily check the authenticity of Bitcoin. The blockchain makes every transaction transparent and traceable for everyone. There is no way to create counterfeit Bitcoin.


(12) Infinite capacity

The ideal store of value is there for everyone. This means that you can store both 10 euros and 100 billion in it.


-> Bitcoin has no upper limit to the amount of value you can store. Whether it's small amounts for everyday use or large assets, Bitcoin is accessible and scalable for everyone, regardless of the size of your wealth.


(13) Same rules

The store of value should treat all holders equally and not assign special rules to anyone just because more money was deposited.


-> Bitcoin knows no special treatment. Whether you own 0.001 BTC or 100 BTC, the network treats all participants equally. Every Bitcoin owner is subject to the same rules and conditions. Unlike traditional financial systems, which often favor the rich, Bitcoin is egalitarian and transparent.


(14) Final

A transaction in the ideal store of value should be final and irreversible.


-> Bitcoin transactions are final. There is no way to undo a completed transaction.


(15) Not forgeable/corruptible

Neither forgery nor corruptibility should be possible.


-> Due to the use of cryptography and decentralization, Bitcoin is forgery-proof and non-corruptible. There is no way to manipulate or counterfeit Bitcoin.


(16) Fungible

Each piece of the store of value should have the same value as another piece of the same size. Two pieces of the same size do not have the same value.


-> Every Bitcoin is of equal value. Whether you own a Bitcoin in the USA or in Germany, it has the same value. There are no differences between units, as can be the case with other assets (e.g. real estate or art).

(This point is where I would still be most contentious with someone saying that Bitcoin does not 100% fulfill this property, as certain UTXOs, such as those associated with criminal activity, are not 100% equivalent to others. )


Why gold, stocks and real estate do not fulfill all the properties of a perfect store of value

Now that we have clarified why Bitcoin fulfills all 16 characteristics of an ideal store of value, the question arises: How do other popular asset classes such as gold, equities and real estate fare in this comparison? As this article is already relatively long, I have tried to keep it as short as possible. I have also not mentioned all the points and explained them in detail.


Gold 🪙

Gold has been used as a store of value for thousands of years and has proven to be stable in times of crisis. But is that enough to make it the perfect store of value? Unfortunately not.

  • Inflation: Even gold is not immune to inflation. Every year, around 2% of the world's gold reserves are newly mined, which reduces scarcity over time.
  • Divisibility: Unlike Bitcoin, gold can only be divided to a limited extent. If you own a gram of gold, it's not as easy to precisely divide it into smaller units and use them.
  • Liquidity: While gold is valuable, it's not always easy to trade around the clock. You need physical markets or specialized dealers, and selling times are also often limited.
  • Transportability: Gold is heavy and physical. This makes it vulnerable to theft and complicated in terms of logistics. Transporting a few kilograms of gold is much more costly and risky than sending a few Bitcoin from A to B.
  • Costs: Gold incurs high storage and insurance costs. These costs increase the more gold you own, making it an expensive store of value compared to Bitcoin.
  • Availability and accessibility: Gold is not available everywhere. In many parts of the world, access to gold is difficult and requires specialized storage locations.
  • Counterfeiting: Verifying the authenticity of gold is a challenge. Many gold bars and coins have been counterfeited in the past or made with inferior materials.

Gold fulfills some important characteristics of a store of value, but in the modern world where speed, flexibility and security are crucial, it cannot keep pace with Bitcoin.


Shares📊

Shares are considered one of the most popular forms of investment (who am I telling here on the platform😉). However, they perform far worse as a store of value.

  • Inflation: Companies are constantly issuing new shares, which can dilute your holding.
  • Divisibility: Shares are not as flexibly divisible as bitcoin.
  • Liquidity: Although shares can be traded on stock exchanges, they can only be traded at certain times and on certain days. Unlike Bitcoin, stock markets are not open around the clock.
  • Transportability and portability: Shares can't just be shipped from A to B.
  • Third-party access and control: Shares are controlled by many institutions. Companies, governments and regulators have an influence on the stock markets, which means that your ownership is never fully protected. Your assets could be confiscated.

Stocks are an excellent investment when it comes to capital appreciation, but they don't fulfill the requirements of a perfect store of value nearly as well as Bitcoin.


Real estate🏠

Real estate is often seen as a long-term store of value. However, they have considerable weaknesses in this context.

  • Inflation: More and more properties are being built. In addition, rising costs for maintenance, repairs and property taxes lead to a reduction in value over time.
  • Divisibility: Real estate is the prime example of a lack of divisibility. You can't simply sell part of your home when you need cash.
  • Liquidity: Real estate is extremely illiquid. Selling a property can take months or even years, and often involves significant fees and commissions.
  • Transportability and portability: Real estate is, by definition, fixed in location. It is inflexible, and even if the economic situation in a particular area deteriorates, your capital remains tied up.
  • Third party access and control: Real estate is highly regulated. You are subject to government regulations, taxes and sometimes even the risk of expropriation. Here, too, the owner has only limited control.
  • Costs: Real estate comes with significant ongoing costs. Maintenance, insurance, taxes and sometimes loss of rent make it an expensive store of value.

Real estate may be valuable and relatively stable, but its immobility, high costs and illiquidity make it much less attractive as a store of value than Bitcoin.


Conclusion

We all invest to carry our purchasing power into the future. Everyone wants to escape inflation and carry their purchasing power into the future in the form of work/life.


On the stock market, the motto is to spread money as widely as possible. To this end, we misuse assets as a store of value that should actually fulfill a different function. A property is a consumer good that you can live in. Gold is used for jewelry and in small quantities in industry. With shares, you own a stake in a company and can have a say and participate in the increase in value. However, you are dependent on many factors, such as management decisions, changes in the market environment and regulatory hurdles imposed by the government.


Diversification of assets helps to compensate for the weaknesses of individual companies.


So if there is a perfect store of value, is diversification into different asset classes even necessary?


I would be delighted if a few of you read the article and leave your comments. Of course, I also appreciate every Like👍and Follow.


Have a nice rest of the week everyone!✌️

Your Stefan


#bitcoin

62
93 Comments

profile image
I've just ordered the book. It's amazing what you keep posting here, thanks for that!
10
profile image
The article is well written, but recognizably with a Bitcoin bias. The book seems to have simply taken 16 properties of BTC that make it plausible as a store of value and then compared everything else to those 16 properties.
The store of value properties that only gold or real estate possess are simply swept under the rug.
Z. For example, you can live in a property and hang gold around your neck, this sensual component is more important than you might think. People value what is beautiful. BTC is abstract, complex and not beautiful. There are other characteristics that BTC does not have: it is not immediately recognizable everywhere in the world. In an emergency, you can get rid of a gold coin at a fair in Djiboutu, where nobody has ever heard of BTC.

And an important point: if the price of BTC hadn't risen so astronomically in recent years, nobody would be interested in it and the 16 properties wouldn't matter at all.

Don't get me wrong: BTC is part of my investment strategy, but it's not a religion.
5
Deleted User
4Mon
Comment was deleted
profile image
@financer_684 The whole thing only works if half the world wants BTC at 1 million and price targets of 10 million are mentioned. This is exactly when all those who have hodled BTC from 100k to 1million would have to say: nice and stupid, half the world, that they are paying 1 million for an asset with no utility value, we are selling!

Almost anything can happen with BTC, but it won't! 😅

Incidentally, BTC also has all the characteristics of a Ponzi scheme. Run while it lasts and then run as fast as you can....
2
profile image
@Epi Thanks for your criticism. Of course the post is written with a bitcoin bias - you know me slowly😉

Yes you can live in a property, but you still have the risks and taxes. I wouldn't describe "being able to live in it" or "hanging around as a chain" as characteristics that a store of value should have - but of course I know what you mean.

The price is of course the biggest advertisement for Bitcoin. People are always driven by fear and greed. In the hype phases, some greedy people come in and in the bear markets, some are out again very quickly. But a few always stay because they are fundamentally interested in Bitcoin and are convinced by its properties.
2
profile image
@Epi Bitcoin doesn't have the characteristics of a Ponzi :D but I could explain that in a post - it's a good idea for a post.
2
profile image
@stefan_21 You're probably right. BTC has some of the characteristics of a Ponzi scheme, not all. Differentiating here would indeed be worth a separate article. 👍
1
profile image
@financer_684 You have to ask yourself, why would you sell an asset that can rise indefinitely at 1 million for a currency that loses purchasing power indefinitely?
At one million, Bitcoin would have just overtaken the market capitalization of gold as things stand today. Once it is that big, volatility will also have decreased and it will be recognized worldwide as a store of value. Otherwise, it will not reach the 1 million mark.
2
Deleted User
4Mon
Comment was deleted
profile image
@financer_684 Sell? I.e. you want to exchange BTC for real currency with which you can buy real things and services?
1
profile image
@Epi By real currency, do you mean the kind that is created out of nothing at the push of a button and imposed on you from above by obliging you to pay your taxes in Monopoly money?
profile image
@financer_684 I can understand that most people will take profits from time to time.
View all 11 further answers
profile image
Merci 👌, you really make me want to invest in $BTC...
4
profile image
I have to say "thank you" again. 🙏🏼
Nothing new when dealing with the subject, but always very informative and thought-provoking.
3
profile image
@UnknowU Absolutely. Unfortunately, many people still think of Bitcoin as an object of speculation with no "intrinsic value" :)
profile image
@stefan_21 Again, I have to admit that the high volatility makes it difficult to weight the portfolio so highly. You really are an extreme example & have your reasons, so I won't include that in my argument. But try to make someone understand that you can keep the share at 30-40% and not feel bad about it. Of course, this requires a certain amount of experience in dealing with fluctuations.
I am sure that the majority of investors do not conform to this due to a lack of diversification.
However, I believe that 60-70% index (which index is up to you) and 30-40% BTC also represents a certain amount of diversification.
profile image
@UnknowU I'm right there with you. I have decided to go down this path for myself - but that doesn't mean others have to follow suit. In the future, I too will probably put some of my assets back into an ETF alongside Bitcoin :)
1
profile image
Thanks for this MEGA awesome post ❤️✌️
2
profile image
Great, thanks for that! In addition, here is a video by Michael Saylor on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBmK3pI7uKw
2
profile image
🫶
1
profile image
Great article, but should I read it? I'm only on page 50 of the book ... :D
1
profile image
@Testo-Investor Better read the book to the end :D
1
profile image
@stefan_21 I'm going to Berlin tomorrow and then I'll have time 💪💪💪
1
profile image
@Testo-Investor Posts here are too long for you from 7 words, but you read books?
1
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor old I also have the book he's talking about. In the article and why should I read his summary now if I read the book now in the next two days? 😂
profile image
@Testo-Investor That was not the question 😁
1
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor yes and yes :-)
1
profile image
The book has been ordered and will arrive in good time before the plane takes off. So the vacation reading is safe. 😎🍹🥥
1
1
profile image
The only problem is that Bitcoin has built-in inflation and therefore does not fulfill [1].
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor Damn, what are we going to do now until 2140?
profile image
1
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor That is not correct. BTC is deflationary. The maximum amount is limited to 21 million, unless 51% of miners worldwide agree to change the protocol and expand the total amount. Or have I misunderstood you?
1
profile image
@Yeez The donkey or the class clown also likes to troll sometimes🙃
The 51% of miners is not quite right. The miners are welcome to try, but the nodes would reject the blocks :)
The users would have to agree on this, but would trigger a hard fork and then it would depend on which network of users and miners would continue.
But that would never, of course, ever happen. In the Blocksize Wars, even 80% of miners wanted to increase the blocksize limit and failed or created Bitcoin Cash, which is economically completely irrelevant. I can recommend the book "Blocksize War" by Jonathan Bier :) soon to be published in German by Aprycot Media.
1
profile image
@stefan_21 I haven't actually dealt with the block size wars, blind spot... but I have on the subject of 'what risks exist for the value store'. My conclusion was that this is only possible via a fork, which is then adopted by the majority of miners (and nodes, you're right). The risks I see are a) an increase in the number of coins and an increase in the size of the blocks, because this would reduce the miners' remuneration per unit of energy used. Then some would disappear from the market, the hashrate would fall and the system would be more susceptible to a 51% attack. In any case, the intrinsic value would fall. Highly unlikely, because all those who agree would have to be paid in Bitcoi, devaluing their business and their assets...
1
profile image
@Yeez Bitcoin has a social contract, so to speak. People use Bitcoin because it is absolutely limited. People use Bitcoin because we have a block size limit and everyone can run a node at home.

That's why such forks will never be successful. My node would never get such an update. Every node operator determines what their Bitcoin looks like individually, so to speak.

The fall in the hashrate:
If the hashrate falls, mining becomes easier and more profitable again for all other miners, who can then in turn increase their capacities, causing the hashrate to rise again.

Intrinsic value:
Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. According to the Austrian school, however, this does not exist either, as value is always subjective. If I subjectively estimate the value of a good to be higher than its market price, I am prepared to buy the good. The seller, on the other hand, only sells a good if he subjectively estimates its value to be lower than the market price.

Bitcoin does not generate any cash flow, which is why it has an intrinsic value of exactly 0 from an economist's perspective. However, it does have inherent properties, such as those I have described in the article, which make it (or can make it) a store of value.

The positive thing is that if a share moves away from its "intrinsic value" and the P/E ratio or KUV or whatever is considered far too high, investors will sell - and the share will fall. The same applies to a property where the price bears no relation to the rental income. As Bitcoin cannot be "valued" in this respect, it can also rise indefinitely😉
1
profile image
@stefan_21 I agree with one exception: the intrinsic value is defined by energy. Oil - is in all products and the price in FIAT money rises with the expansion of the money supply. Gold: the price measured in FIAT currency rises because the energy input remains at least the same. Real estate: the price measured in FIAT currency rises because the energy required to build it remains at least the same... Bitcoin: the price measured in FIAT currency increases because the energy used for mining and proof of work remains at least the same. Industrially manufactured goods that can be produced ever faster and more efficiently thanks to technological innovation (such as paper banknotes, frozen pizza or TV sets) require comparatively less energy (whether for mining the raw materials or the manufacturing process) are the counterexample.
In my view, the energy - in whatever form - contained in an asset defines its intrinsic value.
profile image
@Yeez I understand the idea, but I don't see it that way.
The energy required to extract gold or produce real estate does not remain the same - technological progress means we can produce more and more of it more easily and with less energy.

Let's take Bitcoin as an example again: the energy is not stored in Bitcoin. The energy is converted into heat and the Bitcoin comes out as a kind of "waste product". In economic terms, the energy is lost, so to speak, because you can no longer get the energy out of the Bitcoin network.

The assumption that a good has more value the more work or energy was put into it is the labor theory of value, which is simply wrong. If I produce a product by hand with enormous effort and energy expenditure, the good is not worth more than if a machine produces it in a short time with little effort :)
1
profile image
@Yeez Can you actually see everything in my message? My message is simply cut off after "Energy yes".
If necessary, I have to split the message into several🤨
profile image
@Yeez Yes, that is correct. New Bitcoin is created every day. This makes Bitcoin inflationary. At least until the last Bitcoin is mined in 100 years. So for the rest of our lives, Bitcoin is inflationary.

I haven't read the other comments. @stefan_21 is right about everything he says though
1
View one more answer
profile image
Hey, how can I reach you? I have a few questions for you about Bitcoin.
profile image
@income_magician_717 Hi, you are welcome to ask me your questions here - I will be happy to answer them :)
profile image
I've ordered the Tangem wallet. And then want to invest in Bitcoin. I currently have Bitcoin and ETH. But not very much yet. My question is: the current Bitcoin cycle is already relatively advanced. Is it still worth investing then? Or will I be too late? And the whole thing repeats itself every 4 years, doesn't it? Can you give me a few tips on how best to proceed?
profile image
@income_magician_717 If you go by the cycle theory then we should see the top in September/October 25. Just because we have always had 4-year cycles in the past does not automatically mean that it will stay that way forever.
My tip to you would be that you shouldn't try to time the market too much, but just stubbornly pursue DCA, especially at the beginning. Simply invest weekly or monthly using a savings plan.
And read books, watch videos and listen to podcasts in the meantime :)
profile image
@stefan_21 and where is it good to make such a savings plan? I'm currently using Coinbase, but it's very expensive. What would you recommend?
profile image
@income_magician_717 would recommend Strike or 21Bitcoin. The savings plan costs 0.79% with 21Bitcoin and 0% with Strike from the second week. I am very happy with 21Bitcoin but I have now switched my savings plans to Strike :)
profile image
@stefan_21 and with regard to the transaction fees. At Coinbase this was calculated automatically. Do you have to enter this yourself with 21Bitcoin or Strike?
profile image
@income_magician_717 21Bitcoin does it automatically. They take care of it and you only ever pay 1000 sats per payout - so that's mega cheap. At Strike you can choose between high, medium and low priority. The low one takes about 24 hours, but costs nothing.
You can also withdraw your Bitcoin from Strike via Lightning - this is also almost free, so it only costs a few cents in transaction fees.
profile image
@stefan_21 it’s lightning possible with Tangem cold wallet?
profile image
@income_magician_717 I don't think so. But you can download a Lightning Wallet like Phoenix or Wallet of Satoshi and then always send the Bitcoin there. As soon as you have saved a certain amount, e.g. 0.01 Bitcoin, you can swap it to your hardware wallet. I always do this via Boltz. You can see how it works in this video, for example:
https://youtu.be/PTsrh8FXOqs?si=wRuH2udId7i3Q1Pb

However, if this is too complicated for you, you can also simply transfer directly from Strike or 21Bitcoin to your hardware wallet. The costs are also kept within limits :)
profile image
@stefan_21 I think I'll start by doing it directly via 21Bitcoin or Strike. But why does it work with this Lightning wallet if the Tangem wallet doesn't support Lightning at all? Or does it work through the intermediate step with Phoenix or wallet of Satoshi?
View all 17 further answers
Deleted User
4Mon
Comment was deleted
profile image
@financer_684 but wouldn't you expect an asset with these characteristics to be extremely volatile in the first few years until the market can agree on a value?)
We'll see about the institutions. I think they will have no other choice
1
Deleted User
4Mon
Comment was deleted
profile image
@financer_684 Volatility has already decreased in every cycle. I also assume that this will continue - which is logical, as more and more capital is needed to move the price.
The big institutions can of course buy, but this also drives up the price.
A great deal of capital is needed to manipulate the price at this trading volume. If you sell a lot of Bitcoin and try to influence the price negatively, you can only do this once. It's not as if you can reprint Bitcoin indefinitely.
If you sell Bitcoin in order to quickly buy more at a lower price, it can either go well and the price makes a short dip and then rises again, or it can go wrong and the player loses a lot Bitcoin🤷‍♂️
So I'm not very worried about that. I agree that it could take a very long time for the volatility to subside :)
1
profile image
@financer_684 total nonsense... what a statement... of course the big ones will allow it... at the moment they just want to stock up cheaply... Bitcoin will continue to mature... and vola is a positive thing... so you can get into an assset much cheaper... why do you see it negatively? Because you don't pay enough attention to it ... that's why
Deleted User
4Mon
Comment was deleted
profile image
@financer_684 and you have 0 idea about the Krypo Game :) Good luck with your 15% :D :D :D :D :
Deleted User
4Mon
Comment was deleted
profile image
@financer_684 no deficits, but your question is so hollow... should I sell at +15% blabnlabal, what should people advise you? This platform is completely wrong about crypo ... 99% of the people here have nothing to do with crypto...
Deleted User
4Mon
Comment was deleted
profile image
@Testo-Investor I think you've confused @Basde99 and @financer_684 with each other🤣
1
View all 2 further answers
Join the conversation