1D·

I just can't decide: All-World or World?

After @FKabs kindly and with sound knowledge about the intricacies of the Austrian tax system, I have finally moved away from Amundi and will definitely be adding a Vanguard product to my portfolio.


Now I'm only wavering between the Vanguard FTSE All-World $VWRL (+1,44%) and the Vanguard Developed World $VDEV (+1,58%) as the long-term core for my portfolio.


Do I really need the emerging markets at the core?

If an emerging market performs well in the long term, it will move up into the World at some point anyway, so it would then automatically be included in the VDEV. Is the small EM component in the VWRL (approx. 10%) worthwhile for this or is it more of a drag on returns?


Or do I get the best of both worlds with a lower average TER by simply adding the $VFEM (+0,78%) with e.g. 10% added?


Questions upon questions. Everything is open to me.

How do you see it? Has anyone gone through a similar consideration?

Please help

5
2 Comentários

imagem de perfil
$VWRL and that's it. No rebalancing, no pondering, just put in as much as you can.
And stick with it for years and don't rebalance after 3 months because you read something about a 3GTAA strategy or something like that
2
imagem de perfil
I was faced with the same decision at the time and opted for the All-World for reasons of simplicity. Rebalancing happens automatically and since I'm not making a bet with my core investment on who will be the winner in 30 years, the All-World is the easiest way to go. You will thank yourself in 30 years :)

The bigger leverage is definitely to increase the savings rate instead of maximizing on the last percentage point of TER and weighting :)
2
Participar na conversa