2D
Not bad!
But how do you arrive at "only" +8.6% with the high returns of the winners? Are there so few or so little weighted?
But how do you arrive at "only" +8.6% with the high returns of the winners? Are there so few or so little weighted?
•
11
•
@Epi
With my 60-position ETF, it's just spread out.
Nevertheless, I should have beaten the NASDAQ
With my 60-position ETF, it's just spread out.
Nevertheless, I should have beaten the NASDAQ
•
11
•2D
@Tenbagger2024 I see, the screenshot is only a very small section.
And yes, QQQ was up approx. +4.5% (in EUR).
And yes, QQQ was up approx. +4.5% (in EUR).
••
@Epi
Yes exactly, I have quite a few positions because I've put in a few growth stocks.
So the probability of finding a tenbagger is higher. Just like this week with applovin.
Yes exactly, I have quite a few positions because I've put in a few growth stocks.
So the probability of finding a tenbagger is higher. Just like this week with applovin.
••
2D
@Tenbagger2024 I know the logic well 😉
I now do a little more differentiated math:
Potential profit = 1)Position size x 2)Price potential x 3)Probability of occurrence.
In your case (for many values) 2 are very large, but 1+3 are very small.
In my strategies, I have tried to reverse this so that two factors work for me and not just one. 😬
But in the end, only success proves you right. So if you also achieve the goal of "constant excess return", then it's a good fit. 👍
I now do a little more differentiated math:
Potential profit = 1)Position size x 2)Price potential x 3)Probability of occurrence.
In your case (for many values) 2 are very large, but 1+3 are very small.
In my strategies, I have tried to reverse this so that two factors work for me and not just one. 😬
But in the end, only success proves you right. So if you also achieve the goal of "constant excess return", then it's a good fit. 👍
•
33
•@Epi
I am satisfied so far.
I have built a core of quality stocks (endurance runners / compounders).
And around it satellites, smaller growth stocks.
In contrast to an ETF, I only try to pick out the cherries.
So the probability of beating the World or NASDAQ is given.
In contrast to an ETF, I can react and rebalance at any time.
But if possible, I try to let everything run for the time being.
I am satisfied so far.
I have built a core of quality stocks (endurance runners / compounders).
And around it satellites, smaller growth stocks.
In contrast to an ETF, I only try to pick out the cherries.
So the probability of beating the World or NASDAQ is given.
In contrast to an ETF, I can react and rebalance at any time.
But if possible, I try to let everything run for the time being.
•
22
•@Epi
By the way, try to avoid small position sizes.
By the way, try to avoid small position sizes.
•
22
•2D
@Tenbagger2024 With 60 positions, each position has an average of 1.67%. What does "small position" mean for you?
••
@Epi
Yes, you're right in percentage terms, of course.
I just meant in terms of the € sum, so that a multibagger is also worthwhile.
Yes, you're right in percentage terms, of course.
I just meant in terms of the € sum, so that a multibagger is also worthwhile.
••
2D
@Tenbagger2024 How? You still think in absolute values? 😮
••
@Epi
I just wanted to say that I don't buy shares for a small amount.
Except perhaps for an absolute risk value.
I just wanted to say that I don't buy shares for a small amount.
Except perhaps for an absolute risk value.
••