LoginSignup
imagem de perfil
Dominic
@BregisMoon
3Ano·
2
6 Comentários
imagem de perfil
RealMichaelScott@RealMichaelScott
3Ano
It may be true that they are valued much more favorably. The question that should always be asked is: why? One answer could be the high debts that weigh on the company. EBIT of about $900 million is offset by net debt of almost $6 billion. On top of that, it is the smallest player in the industrial gas oligopoly. The risks are simply greater than for the other three companies.
•
6
•
Utilizador eliminado
3Ano
O comentário foi eliminado
imagem de perfil
RealMichaelScott@RealMichaelScott
3Ano
@Boarkeinname Firstly, who else do they want to take over in a market that is virtually controlled by four companies? Secondly, they would probably have to take on new debt and that would not be so advantageous at the current level of debt.
••
Ver mais uma resposta
imagem de perfil
Dominic@BregisMoon
2Ano
Just wanted to say: 72% YtD performance 😜
•
1
•
imagem de perfil
Hannes@Hannes_SK
3Ano
Valued much more favorably as they are de facto irrelevant. Even in the Far East, Linde and Air Liquide dominate. The company's only notable achievement was the acquisition of Praxair's production facilities in the merger. 😅
••
imagem de perfil
CD@Carpe-Diem
3Ano
.I prefer to think of local or regional big players in the energy sector rather than global ones.
••
Participar na conversa
Registe-seIniciar sessão