imagem de perfil
4Mês
You're drilling a big hole there! 😅

In the end, most people here will continue to pursue their dividend strategies, not because they are rational, but because they feel good. I would agree with Kommer: better than nothing. 🤷
2
imagem de perfil
@Epi Thank you dear, I think that's a very important contribution from you. You are also somehow the Kommer of getquin
1
imagem de perfil
4Mês
@Tenbagger2024 Well, on the one hand, I like Kommers' commitment to passive index investing. On the other hand, I think he sometimes overdoes it and backs up his statements with distorted statistics, maW he sometimes twists the numbers to make it fit.

There are also more long-term charts on the subject of dividend strategy and then things look different: https://gfmasset.com/2020/08/over-time-high-dividend-stocks-outperform-low-dividend-stocks/
1
imagem de perfil
@Epi
Yes, exactly, that's why everyone should choose the strategy that helps them sleep well.
We both get on well 😘
1
imagem de perfil
@Epi I think you always have to look at what investors understand by high-dividend. For some, Microsoft is already part of it, others don't do it at $AGNC and while the former is a good stock, the latter is more likely to be dirt.
1
imagem de perfil
4Mês
@devnerd_daddy That's right, basically for every study it would have to be defined exactly what is meant by "high dividend", how often you rebalance and with which rules, etc. This is usually all completely unclear and so you end up with whatever result you want. 🤷
1