As the TDIV was only launched in 2016, the comparison is not entirely "clean". And the pure price performance is not accurate. I had a quick look at Extra ETF, where the total performance including distributions is given as 166.37% since inception
•
55
•
@Dividendenopi
I have just added a contribution by Gerd Kommer. Very interesting
I have just added a contribution by Gerd Kommer. Very interesting
•
11
•
@Tenbagger2024 which is incorrect, as historically dividend stocks have outperformed non dividend stocks, only over the last 20 years they are underperforming growth (so not over more than 20 years). In the lost decade 2000-2010, the dividend aristocrats outperformed as well. It is since 2012 till 2024 that dividend stocks underperformed growth stocks (and the distinction between the two groups is also not really black and white) and this by a lot (unfortunately for us dividend investors, but that is just the way it goes and in the meantime I can buy much 'cheaper' than growth investors).
In 2025 dividend portfolio's are doing just fine. AI oriented portfolio's are performing exceptionally well, now for a few years already, but the valuations of 80% of those companies is built on thin air and when I hear and read more and more about that it is because of how AI is the future and profits will come and PE is not valid for evaluating those stocks, the more I have the feeling we are back in 1999-2000.
For every reference you give I can give ten others and in return you can give 20 back. It is a neverending debate, and neither one is completely right or wrong. I love dividends and I'm missing out on gaining a lot with ASML, AMD and Nvidia, but I'm happy with my lower return, as I'm taking less risk.
In 2025 dividend portfolio's are doing just fine. AI oriented portfolio's are performing exceptionally well, now for a few years already, but the valuations of 80% of those companies is built on thin air and when I hear and read more and more about that it is because of how AI is the future and profits will come and PE is not valid for evaluating those stocks, the more I have the feeling we are back in 1999-2000.
For every reference you give I can give ten others and in return you can give 20 back. It is a neverending debate, and neither one is completely right or wrong. I love dividends and I'm missing out on gaining a lot with ASML, AMD and Nvidia, but I'm happy with my lower return, as I'm taking less risk.
•
22
•@JorisInvests
You are right. It's the mixture that makes the difference
You are right. It's the mixture that makes the difference
•
22
•