1Mês·

$WINC vs. $JEGP

I'm interested to know why many $JEGP (-0,16%) in the portfolio, although there is also the $WINC (-0,98%) which pursues a similar strategy but has a higher return and higher distribution so far.

18 Comentários

Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead

1Mês

The two have very different profiles. One is strongly oriented towards the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index (JEPG). The other is based instead on the classic MSCI World with its usual composition (WINC). I don't need that in my portfolio, for example. It would be too redundant for me. That's why JPM's active approach is more interesting for me.

•

GeldGenie@GeldGenie

1Mês

Benchmarking function needed? 👍 The ETFs are practically the same, but differ in performance depending on the section, logically due to the reference value. Soooo I can't quite understand your point.

•

Fortunus@Quiny

1Mês

@GeldGenie Equal is definitely something else for me.
+10,4% != +4,3%

••

GeldGenie@GeldGenie

1Mês

@Quiny Sooo in CHF at least it was the difference I quoted. If there was a PN I could show it 😅

••

Banana M.@Banana_Millionaire

1Mês

I honestly believe that most people are only interested in the monthly payout 😂

•

Fortunus@Quiny

1Mês

@Banana_Millionaire This is even higher at $WINC.

••

Banana M.@Banana_Millionaire

1Mês

@Quiny I mean the frequency. The $WINC distributes in January, April, July and October. The $JEGP every month.
It's completely banal, but many people have developed a fetish for it.

•

Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead

1Mês

@Banana_Millionaire you will probably be right

••

Patrick@PaFl

1Mês

The $WINC is "relatively" just under 18 months, I think. The volume of the ETF has been rising well since then $JEGP has been around for longer and is also better known. If you are purely interested in the distribution and less in the composition, I would give $WINC a chance.

•

CieloAzul@Cieloazul

1Mês

The Winc is the same as the Bali in the USA, isn't it?

•

Saschko@WarrenamBuffet

1Mês

@Cieloazul sure? But yes, it looks very similar...

•

Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead

1Mês

Not quite. $INCU corresponds $BALI

•

Stefan@Da_Fischi

1Mês

Because of the volatility, you can see the difference between the two very well in April.

••

Oleg@ScorpionfromBW

1Mês

Perhaps because of the TER, which is more than twice as low, and the fund volume, which is more than 10 times higher? In addition, the values and the breakdown are already different

••

Saschko@WarrenamBuffet

1Mês

@ScorpionfromBW the display here is not correct, both have TER 0.35

•

Oleg@ScorpionfromBW

1Mês

@WarrenamBuffet ok, I didn't know that.

••

Saschko@WarrenamBuffet

1Mês

@ScorpionfromBW yes that annoys me about getquin, some of the data is old or simply not correct