2D·

ETFs vs. Individual Stocks: What’s your "Core-Satellite" Ratio? 🛰️🌍

We all know the rule: Younger = More Stocks, Older = More Bonds. But there’s a second layer most people miss: How much of your stock portfolio should be in broad ETFs versus individual "conviction" picks?


-----------------------

NOTE: This is made for the broader investor group of people. Not most of us on Getquin, who spends more time watching stockgraphs and balance sheets than watching nature outside. ;)

-----------------------


The goal is to balance the safety of a global index with the alpha (market-beating potential) of picking winners. Here is a breakdown of how that ratio usually evolves:


1. The "Aggressive Builder" (Age 20–35)

Target Equity Split: 70% ETFs / 30% Individual Stocks


Strategy: You have the most valuable asset in the world—time.


Why: Use a broad ETF (like $VWCE (+0,59%) or $VTI (+0,75%) ) as your "Safety Net." The 30% individual stock portion is your "Satellite" where you can take bigger swings on growth or tech stocks. Even if a few of your stock picks go to zero, your 70% core keeps your retirement on track.


2. The "Wealth Optimizer" (Age 35–50)

Target Equity Split: 85% ETFs / 15% Individual Stocks


Strategy: Protect what you've built while still "playing the game."


Why: Life gets busy. Between career and family, most investors have less time for deep-dive research. Shifting more into ETFs ensures you don't underperform the market due to a lack of oversight, while the 15% allows you to keep a few high-conviction "blue chips" or dividend growers like $VICI (+0,42%) or $AAPL (-0,56%) .


3. The "Legacy Guardian" (Age 50+)

Target Equity Split: 95% ETFs / 5% Individual Stocks


Strategy: Simplicity and preservation.


Why: At this stage, a 50% drop in one "hot stock" can actually hurt your retirement timeline. Most veteran investors shift to 95% "boring" ETFs. The 5% in stocks is often just for fun or to stay connected to companies you truly love.


The "Golden Rule" of Diversification

If your individual stock picks aren't outperforming your broad market ETF over a 3-year period, you aren't "investing"—you're paying for an expensive hobby.


I'm currently: 65% Stocks, 35% ETFs at 21 years old.


Any thoughts?

attachment
5
3 Comentários

imagem de perfil
Age is only a number. Experience is key for investing either in stocks or ETFs.
So for me the thesis is absolut bullshit.
Perhaps in 30 years you will understand my point of view.
3
imagem de perfil
So, i‘m doing it in the wrong way. 🙈 but in some way i agree, protecting should be prioritized
imagem de perfil
Protection isn't about stock vs. ETF
Protection is about navigating different market regimes, be prepared for both deflation, inflation, stagflation and so forth.

I would even argue, being aware of a potential "4th turning moment" is important from a security POV.

A good video from UK veteran (very rational, very data driven):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O4ddk3WCEU
His key argument: If you have enough saved/earned, there is a strong argument for derisking and making sure, you're not loosing rather than trying to beat the market with high-beta stocks!
Participar na conversa