Congratulations, but unfortunately not very meaningful without absolute figures 😕
••
@opportunity_seeker_742 Thank you, but explain 🤔
After all, the performance of the portfolio is only really comparable on this basis and that's what matters...
The fact that I don't have a seven-figure portfolio at 17, but rather a low five-figure portfolio, shouldn't change the percentage performance 🤷🙃
After all, the performance of the portfolio is only really comparable on this basis and that's what matters...
The fact that I don't have a seven-figure portfolio at 17, but rather a low five-figure portfolio, shouldn't change the percentage performance 🤷🙃
••
@Klein-Anleger1 How? Not seven figures? Expandable 😁
•
11
•@HoldTheMike I know 😭
Let me finish my Abi first 😂
Let me finish my Abi first 😂
••
@Klein-Anleger1 Let's stick with your example. If the seven-figure portfolio is a dividend portfolio, you will of course have a significantly better performance in percentage terms. In return, however, he will have achieved significantly higher returns in absolute figures than you with the dividends received alone, and then of course there is the price increase. Furthermore, I doubt that you would use such a strategy with a seven-figure portfolio and therefore such performance comparisons without absolute figures are meaningless.
••
@opportunity_seeker_742 Nope, returns are usually compared in %, that's a fact! Of course, the portfolio size has an influence on the strategy you pursue with a portfolio, but I think the vast majority of people here know what my intention is and how much or little money I have available...
••
@opportunity_seeker_742
"The return is usually calculated annually and given as a percentage. This makes it possible to compare different forms of investment in terms of their potential."
https://www.vr.de/privatkunden/themenwelten/finanzen/investieren-anlegen/rendite.html
"The return is usually calculated annually and given as a percentage. This makes it possible to compare different forms of investment in terms of their potential."
https://www.vr.de/privatkunden/themenwelten/finanzen/investieren-anlegen/rendite.html
••
@Klein-Anleger1 You have just contradicted yourself. If the size of the portfolio has an influence on the strategy, you can't compare the portfolios on a percentage basis for the reasons mentioned above. But everyone has different views and I personally would always do without percentage returns if the absolute figures fit, but perhaps the thinking also comes from a certain portfolio size.
••
@opportunity_seeker_742 Nope, I didn't contradict myself! I said that the size of the portfolio has an influence on the strategy. Nevertheless, the comparison is always made in % in order to have a comparable basis!
PS: Why don't you post something here in the forum, otherwise I've never seen anything real from you, at least I don't think so 🙈😏
PS: Why don't you post something here in the forum, otherwise I've never seen anything real from you, at least I don't think so 🙈😏
••
@opportunity_seeker_742 You seem to have had quite a bitter year 😉 Hopefully things will work out better in 2026 🙃👍
••
@Klein-Anleger1 I'll try to explain it again in an understandable way: Why would a seven-figure portfolio want to compare itself with you if, as I said, it alone pays out more in dividends than you have made in returns? Or what's the point of being better in percentage terms if the dividends are higher than your entire portfolio?
And since you want to invest in it with your immature years: My portfolio is in six figures, of course you're better in percentage terms, but in terms of returns in absolute figures I can only laugh at you 😂
And since you want to invest in it with your immature years: My portfolio is in six figures, of course you're better in percentage terms, but in terms of returns in absolute figures I can only laugh at you 😂
••